How To Get Mutual Aid and Bail Funds into the Hands of Student Protestors Now

Red, Green, White, and Black collage says the words "demilitarize education" and the backs of the heads of two protestors
Photography: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images and Alex Kent/Getty Images // Art: Autostraddle

Yesterday, when the Autostraddle editors got together to discuss what kind of coverage we would be able to do to be of service to our community in this time of hurt, of protest, of bravery, as it relates to the ongoing student protests and encampments against the genocide in Gaza and in support to a free Palestine, we decided on a few things.

First, we knew that we wanted to center the voices of students and honor the student journalists who have been covering the police brutality that met far too many of these activists across college campuses in this country. We wanted to pay students for their work as young professionals and not just treat them as free sources (we have some of that in the works). We wanted more thoughtful pieces, like the kinds of pieces about Palestine that we have already been publishing, because we didn’t want to move the narrative away from where all of our eyes need to ultimately be trained (we have more of that coming as well). But in the meantime, we also wanted to do something actionable, at a time in which so many of us feel full of dread about how to best help verses make anything worse, and what comes next. We decided to create a list of all the encampments that we could find, along with their associated social media accounts, supply request lists, mutual aids, and bail funds.

I took on the task of collecting lists of schools with protests and encampments, so that we could begin our research. At first, I found roughly 30. Then 40. Then 63. And by last night, roughly eight hours from when I started, I found a list of over 120 encampments going on across college campuses in the United States. It’s heart bursting. It’s also too many to research every supply request or bail fund and have this published in a time that would be useful. It’s many to even list out, and they are changing every day (some of these needs are changing hourly!). And so, this is where I am coming to you.

According to AP News, more than 2,000 people have been arrested during pro-Palestinian protests at college campuses across the United States. So many of us have watched as police have rolled into campus with military grade riot gear, called by administrators onto their own students — students whose tuition pays their salaries. The past 10 days, the past seven months, have been a brutal reminder that the United States is a project of brute force and empire making, it would rather turn on its own citizens, on its own kids, then say as much as “Ceasefire Now.”

I’ll admit that I am new to this, writing about the necessity of a free Palestine. Not because it’s new in my heart, but because I worry about saying the wrong things. But we’re so far past that now. Here is a list of over 60 protests and encampments to start, cross-referenced across as many sources as I could. And then, here is a list over over 120 more.

What follows below is a living document, it is purposefully incomplete because the work is not done.Here is your task:

  • Look for a protest or encampment that is near you
  • Give to their supply list if you are able, give to their bail fund if you are able
  • Come back here and share links as you find them, so that we can keep track of where to help.

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.And please, feel free to share your own resources in the comments. I will update this list accordingly.


Arizona

Arizona State University — Tempe, AZ
instagram

University of Arizona — Tuscon, AZ
instagram


California

California State Polytechnic University Humboldt — Arcata, CA
Humboldt for Palestine Instagram
Bay Area SJP Instagram

Occidental College – Los Angeles, CA
instagram

Pomona College — Claremont, CA
instagram

Stanford University — Stanford, CA
instagram

University of California at Berkeley — Berkley, CA
BFP Instagram
Berkeley Law for Palestine instagram

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) — Los Angeles, CA
Supply Requests
Twitter
Instagram

University of Southern California (USC) — Los Angeles, CA
instagram


Colorado

Auraria Campus — Denver, CO
instagram

Community College of Denver – Denver, CO


Connecticut

University of Connecticut — Storrs, CT
instagram

Yale University — New Haven, CT
instagram

Wesleyan University — Middletown, CT
instagram


Florida

Florida International University — Miami, FL
instagram

Florida State University — Tallahassee, FL

University of Florida — Gainesville, FL
instagram

University of South Florida — Hillsborough County, FL
instagram


Georgia

Emory University — Atlanta GA
instagram

University of Georgia — Athens, GA
facebook


Illinois

Northwestern University — Evanston, IL
Instagram
GoFundMe
People’s Resolution
Hot Food Donations Form

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign — Champaign, IL
Instagram


Indiana

Indiana University – Indianapolis, IN
instagram

Purdue University — West Lafayette, IN & Indianapolis, IN
instagram


Kansas

University of Kansas — Lawrence, KS
instagram


Louisiana

Tulane University — New Orleans, LA
instagram


Maryland

University of Maryland — College Park, MD
instagram


Massachusetts

Emerson College — Boston, MA
Instagram

Harvard University — Cambridge, MA
Instagram

Northeastern University — Boston, MA
instagram

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) — Cambridge, MA
instagram

Tufts University — Medford, MA
instagram

Williams College — Williamstown, MA
instagram


Michigan

University of Michigan — Ann Arbor, MI
Instagram
Give Butter


Minnesota

University of Minnesota — Minneapolis, MN
instagram


Missouri

Washington University St. Louis — St. Louis, MO
instagram


Nevada

University of Nevada — Las Vegas, NV


New Jersey

Princeton University — Princeton, NJ
instagram


New Mexico

University of New Mexico — Albuquerque, NM
instagram


New York

City University of New York — New York, NY
instagram

Columbia University — New York, NY
instagram

Cornell University — Tompkins County, NY
instagram

Fashion Institute of Technology — New York, NY
instagram

New School — New York, NY
Instagram

New York University (NYU) — New York, NY
SJP instagram
PSU Instagram
Supplies Call
Ceasefire Petition

University of Rochester — Rochester, NY
instagram


North Carolina

North Carolina State University – Raleigh, NC
instagram
petition

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) — Chapel Hill, NC
instagram


Ohio

Case Western Reserve University — Cleveland, OH
instagram

Miami University Ohio — Oxford, OH
instagram

Oberlin College — Oberlin, OH
instagram

Ohio State University — Columbus, OH
instagram


Oregon

Portland State University — Portland, OR
instagram


Pennsylvania

Bryn Mawr – Bryn Mawr, PA
instagram

Swarthmore College — Swarthmore, PA
instagram

Temple University — Philadelphia, PA
instagram

University of Pennsylvania (Penn) — Philadelphia, PA
Penn Against the Occupation Instagram (currently deactivated)
Penn’s Faculty For Justice in Palestine Instagram

University of Pittsburgh — Pittsburg, PA
instagram


Rhode Island

Brown University — Providence, RI
instagram


Tennessee

Vanderbilt University — Nashville, TN
instagram


Texas

Rice University — Houston, TX
instagram

Texas A&M — College Station, TX
instagram

University of Texas at Austin — Austin, TX
instagram

University of Texas at Dallas — Richardson, TX
instagram

University of Texas at San Antonio — San Antonio, TX
instagram


Utah

University of Utah – Salt lake City, UT


Vermont

Middlebury College — Middlebury, VT
instagram


Virginia

University of Mary Washington — Fredericksburg, VA
instagram

Virginia Commonwealth University — Richmond VA
instagram

Virginia Tech — Blacksburg, VA
instagram


Washington

University of Puget Sound — Tacoma, WA


Washington DC

American University — DC
instragram

Howard University – DC
instagram


Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin, Madison — Madison, WI
instagram

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Carmen Phillips

Carmen is Autostraddle's Editor-in-Chief and a Black Puerto Rican femme/inist writer. She claims many past homes, but left the largest parts of her heart in Detroit, Brooklyn, and Buffalo, NY. There were several years in her early 20s when she earnestly slept with a copy of James Baldwin’s “Fire Next Time” under her pillow. You can find her on twitter, @carmencitaloves.

Carmen has written 702 articles for us.

3 Comments

  1. Thank you, Carmen and Autostraddle, for highlighting this side of the situation while also committing to keeping the focus on Gaza itself.

    As an academic it’s been unsettling how many colleagues (faculty, administrators) are dismissive of the earnest demands being made by protesters.

    These are both much small encampments and schools but there are active encampments at Middlebury in Vermont and at Williams College in Massachusetts.

    • Thank you! I’ll get Middlebury and Williams added.

      And I know that I’m a former academic, but my heart has been so heavy this week with yall. Thank you for what you’re doing.

Comments are closed.

‘Velma’ Season Two Is Less Problematic — So Why Is It Even Worse?

I’ve never witnessed an animated series as unanimously despised as Velma. The Charlie Grandy-developed, diversified, Riverdale-meets-Harley-Quinn wannabe take on the Mystery Gang’s most scholarly member already ruh-rubbed fans the wrong way for omitting the titular lead of the franchise, Scooby-Doo. (Warner Bros. didn’t give the writing team clearance to incorporate the heart of Mystery Incorporated.) But Scooby’s absence may have been forgiven if this iteration of Velma Dinkley wasn’t an overly unlikable, aggressively condescending person towards everyone, lending to some jokes from its writers attacking its fanbase and alienating just about everyone who tried to give it a chance. When I covered the first season for Paste, I didn’t quite share the universal ire, noting its unique, geometrical-based character designs and Scream-esque art direction, even if I, too, found the marquee meta behavior off-putting. Max seemed to have caught wind of its negative reception amongst, well, everyone, because the second season was unceremoniously shadow-dropped onto the platform with absolutely no fanfare.

Now, before people ask, “How can Warner Bros. Discovery drop two seasons of Velma but cancel other original projects as tax write-offs?” I hate to tell you, but when Velma was greenlit, it had a two-order pickup, so much like death itself, Ms. Dinkley’s second coming was inevitable.

Season two picks up a few weeks following Velma’s (Mindy Kaling) victory at solving her first mystery. The Crystal Cove serial killer, Victoria Jones (Cherry Jones), Fred Jones’ (Glenn Howerton) mom, has been caught and — accidentally — murdered by Norville (Sam Richardson). She’s also dealing with the aftermath of finding her longtime missing mother, Divya Dinkley (Sarayu Blue), and her friends-to-enemies-to-crush Daphne (Constance Wu) professing her love to her.

With a solved case under her belt, Velma is now revered by her high school peers, landing in the popular girls’ top rank. And she and Daphne are officially girlfriends — even if their relationship is constantly on the rocks.

This season has the arrival of a new student, a femme non-binary goth named Amber (Sara Ramirez, who can’t seem to leave Max’s platform as the go-to nonbinary rep), and the arrival of a new serial killer. The killer explicitly goes after men and rips their dongs off andit’s up to Velma to meddle her way into solving another case. Meanwhile, Norville starts to experience guilty hallucinations of Victoria’s ghost.

Regarding its humor and tone, Velma season two marginally improves upon the problematic character’s actions and the ensemble’s aggressive unlikability. There’s nothing as rage-inducingly uncomfortable as season one lows like Daphne kissing Velma upon having a panic attack or Norville simping for Velma.

Whatever bland teen drama was teased in its season one finale, the writing staff has crumbled up and thrown into the trash, instead doubling down on its millennial rambling, modern-day referential, styled humor––without insulting the viewer. And yet, at trying so hard to be inoffensive and learn from its mistakes, the comedic offshoots result in even more awkward staging and timing. While the first season had an ugly personality, at least it was bold enough to have one at all.

This cycle however is a slog to trudge through. The unfocused plotting regarding its new mystery, matched with a barrage of endlessly unfunny gags leave you wistfully wondering how significantly different or possibly better the writing would’ve been if WBD had given the team Scoob-blanche to throw him into the team. In Scooby’s absence, Velma throws every horror-based dart to the wall, including ghosts, body-switching, talking brains, mutated monsters, and witchcraft. Yet the series retains its dull, unfunny quality carried over from its predecessor and delivers a mundane, middling season that bears no resemblance to Scooby-Doo outside the character’s names and signature attire. Most of the ensemble spends considerable time apart, enacting on their own considerably uninteresting arcs that come and go like the wind. One episode would revolve around Daphne projecting herself as a witch and the next would be her switching brains with Norville’s long lost grandmother (Vanessa Williams) with no discernable sense of direction nor plot progression.

Possibly if the writers took notes from better adult Scooby-Doo-inspired properties like Venture Bros. or the James Gunn-penned live-action flicks that were initially going to bear a PG-13 rating, they could have honed in on Velma’s queer identity with a natural adult edge. Heck, those movies had a better understanding of Velma and Daphne’s dynamic than they do here. Even as explicit girlfriends, they’re constantly bickering with each other and always at moral odds. Both parties are shallow, and their relationship feels made up on a whim rather than their romance and dual character development feeling earned.

Considering the minimal effort Max made in advertising the series, per the course, with every animated project existing under the anti-animation-led Zaslav regime, the writing is on the wall for the future of Velma. Despite ending on a cliffhanger that teases a Halloween-set third season or a special, it’s clear that this series is about to be put to rest, sent mercilessly to the great cancellation in the sky. It’s painful to see the first POC-led, queer-inclusive version of a long-standing franchise end up its worst. But this is one soon-to-be canceled queer show that won’t be missed.


Velma season two is now streaming on Max.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Rendy Jones

Rendy Jones (they/he) is a film and television journalist born and raised in Brooklyn, New York. They are the world's first gwen-z film journalist and owner of self-published independent outlet Rendy Reviews, a member of the Critics' Choice Association, GALECA, and a screenwriter. They have been seen in Vanity Fair, Them, RogerEbert.com, Rolling Stone, and Paste.

Rendy has written 10 articles for us.

Untethered: I Can’t Stop Talking About Money

It feels like everyone talks and does not talk about money, especially now, especially while we wade knee-deep through inflation that I believe is not so much inflation but rather price-gouging.

I’ve written about wondering whether I should stay in Pittsburgh now that family ties in nearby Buffalo have diminished, and I’ve written about traveling to Thailand and Japan.

There was only one truly shocking thing about Japan for me: the sheer disparity between the economic reality on the ground in Tokyo and the propaganda I’d absorbed over the years. Tokyo’s a major city, so it must be expensive. Also, apparently, people work all the time, constantly, to death. The reality? Food was cheap as hell compared to the US. And the people? Sure, they went to work, but the day seemed to, for many, start a little later to accommodate later nights. I was hard pressed to find a coffee shop open before 9 a.m. And every night, I watched groups of friends as they went out to eat, drink, and otherwise enjoy life. Public services were abundant: easy-to-find bathrooms, frequently running trains, and pedestrian walkways crossing busy intersections and sidewalks threaded across a city larger than Los Angeles. In talking to a former salaryman — who did indeed leave that life and career because it was killing him — he told me he’d worked with people in businesses from countries around the world, but “no one is as hard-working as Americans.” To which, I responded, “because if we lose our jobs, we can die.” Of course, nowhere’s perfect, but it was obvious that everyday entertainment was reasonably accessible for a lot of people, and that even one of Japan’s notoriously overworked ex-salarymen thought Americans might be overdoing it.

When I hear about people moving to Pittsburgh, they often have similar narratives for their why, at least in my circles. It’s too expensive where they were living — no hope of anything but forking over half their paycheck or more on rent, no hope of ever buying a house or saving for something else or finding a cheap room with queer roommates, or where they came from is more or less similarly priced, but a smaller city with much more limited gender affirming healthcare resources. The reasons are almost always economic.

Through a witches’ brew of tax season, multiple deaths, and the constant hum of precarity that rattles the bones of me and everyone around me, money easily worms its way into conversations. I’m writing this from the back of a beater car where a few people are heading up from Providence, RI to see a 29-year-old in hospice in a VA hospital in Boston. We convened at a second-hand comic and record store because one person was putting some old Nintendo games for sale on consignment.

“There’s even tent cities in Providence, now.”

Over coffee with a friend, she tells me how she and her partner got a loan to consolidate credit card debt. I talk with a coworker about partners whom we’ve thanklessly helped pay off student loan debt or supported during their MFA’s. Local signal groups pass around word about ultra-temporary jobs: whether someplace needs someone to work the door that night or to jump in and bar back, when a stadium is putting out a call for people to load out after a big concert. “Recession-core” trends on TikTok and people on there who like to analyze such things mention that neutral and beige colors come back into style during times of economic distress. I clean up renovation debris and take out a loan to cover the cost of electricians and wonder if I should get a roommate when I’ve got the spare bedroom fixed up enough.

Sometimes, I read Refinery29’s money diaries. I marvel at either the thriftiness or the way expenses seem to inflate as the anonymous interviewees disclose their dizzyingly high incomes. I mostly look at the costs of food, of utilities. Groceries, especially, are of interest because a person can only eat so much. Recently, Literary Hub put out their own version. One thing that struck me was the number of writers who were partnered with someone they share expenses with in their money diaries — it was all of them. It brought me back to that viral essay in The Cut about “age-gaps” that was really, actually about marrying rich and heterosexually.

One major aspect of my journey into intentionally stepping off the “relationship escalator” — the impetus for this column — that I don’t think I’ve talked about much has been the way it’s felt to only be financially responsible for myself. Whether it was my ex-husband yelling at me because the wage for a new job I was offered was for ”too little” or trying to budget with my ex-girlfriend in the year before the pandemic started when we both made next to no money and there wasn’t really anything to budget when your “fun money” for the month is $10 each, I always had to negotiate money with someone else. Not doing that is a kind of freedom. It’s not a freedom to take risks in the same way a person can if they have a life partner who can hold them up when they do so, but at the end of the day, if I have to make weird pantry dinners for a while to cover an unexpected bill or if I want to be irresponsible about something, I don’t have to talk to anyone about it.

On the other hand, in all of these articles about marrying rich, about having dual incomes, and in real life examples like the married lesbian couple I know who took turns putting each other through grad school, it’s clear that the systems in place are somewhat set up to punish people going through life on a more solo path. I once watched a coworker rage quit in a toxic work environment, then go home to her boyfriend who worked in tech who then supported her while she started her own consulting business. I was living without a partner at the time (but with roommates) and had to stay in that same job for months longer than her while I looked for another. People who’ve been single for a long time will be like “yeah, Nico, we know,” but there’s no denying that economic realities kept me in a toxic work environment, or, on the flipside, in my abusive marriage and the relationship before it was a marriage. I’ll never forget looking for a room, a space in San Francisco to move out into, one time when I was really trying to leave, and after the last room-in-a-shared apartment showing I went to went so horribly wrong I was actually worried about my physical safety, I just broke down and convinced myself I was being crazy and stayed.

On the other hand, the accumulation of the effects of all my long-term relationships has been a complete lack of savings. So, even as I draw up budgets and cut costs and find ways to build that up as best I can, I can’t quite figure out what is actually financially wiser or better or easier — being solo, finding a partner or partners to live with, collective housing or roommates or keeping my only roommate to the one ghost who lives with me. Ultimately, with the way that money is threaded through every choice I’ve ever made and the way it’s clearly inextricable from partnership (to the point where some people are basing how they choose or seek partners on social status or finances), from choice, from freedom, finding the best path is actually starting to look like burning it all down. And until we can do away with the pressures placed on all of us by late stage Capitalism, I’ll keep trying to thread that needle.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Nico

Nico Hall is Autostraddle's A+ and Fundraising Director, and has been fundraising and working in the arts and nonprofit sector for over a decade. They write nonfiction and personal essays and are currently at work on a queer fiction novel and podcasts. They live in Pittsburgh. Nico is also haunted. You can find them on Twitter and Instagram as @nknhall.

Nico has written 224 articles for us.

‘Hacks’ Is Sooooo Back and Better Than Ever

Hacks returns for its third season this week, bringing back together our favorite toxic work wives Deborah (Jean Smart) and Ava (Hannah Einbinder) for another romp through the farcical worlds of Hollywood, standup comedy, and Las Vegas. We pick up a year after the events of last season, when Deborah’s confessional standup special became an overnight sensation and she subsequently fired Ava in order to push her to work on her own art instead of just writing for her. In other words, we ended with a creative breakup.

We pick up in season three with a fakeout, too. The premiere opens with a long tracking shot from behind as we follow a glitzy-glam woman from behind who we’re meant to believe is Deborah before it’s revealed she’s just a casino showgirl on her way to promote the unveiling of a Deborah-themed slot machine. Deborah has indeed grown too big for her Vegas stage. She’s busy riding the career high of her sensational special, performing in front of audiences who laugh before she even gets to the punchline. Hacks is one of my favorite works of art about making art, and right away in its season three premiere, it starts asking probing, illuminating, difficult-to-answer questions, such as: What if you make it to the supposed top of your field and still feel unsatisfied? Watching Deborah tell jokes in front of an audience that eats everything up almost too much, there’s a sense she’d almost feel more, that it would almost mean more to her if she were bombing.

I often worry about shows as well written and tightly executed as Hacks overstaying their welcome, but the third season as a whole proves Hacks has a lot more to give. That’s all I’ll say about the season holistically for now so as to avoid spoilers and also because I’ll be writing about the season weekly (which won’t take the shape of beat-by-beat recaps but rather deeper dives into standout moments, themes, and scenes). But just know: If you were among those who (myself included!) wondered if Hacks should come back for more, rest assured. It’s still very much giving.

Deborah and Ava on a couch together in Hacks

These first two episodes of season three really reinforce one of my favorite throughlines of the show: its positioning of creative partnership as every bit as meaningful and intimate as a romantic relationship. When I call Ava and Deborah toxic work wives, it’s only kind of a joke. They are the embodiment of a working relationship with bad boundaries, blurring lines between the professional and personal. But Hacks simultaneously zeroes in on these power imbalances and problems while complicating matters even further by showing there’s truth, depth, and maybe even a little good to be found in this kind of artistic marriage. Ava and Deborah push each other creatively. They’re unlikely collaborators, but when they hit their stride, their comedic chemistry in undeniable. It’s not that writing partners should aspire to their level of cruelty and codependency but rather that there’s a level of raw authenticity and sincerity to their relationship.

They are, for better or worse, the most important people in each other’s lives, especially because their other built-in relationships that are supposed to be meaningful (Deborah’s relationship with her daughter and her sister, Ava’s relationship with her mother) are so fucked up. Deborah and Ava have grappled with those other fractured relationships by obsessing over their work, their writing, and now those things are tied up in each other.

As such, the first two episodes unfold with the exact same beats as if two exes were reconnecting and then having emotional affairs with each other. In the premiere, Deborah and Ava end up in an elevator together, and it’s every bit as awkward as two ex-wives running into each other. Ava plays up her recent work in an attempt to prove to Deborah she’s doing great without her. She brags about getting back with her hot girlfriend Ruby who’s in a Marvel series now. Deborah doesn’t really take the bait. Ava accepts an invitation to a drink in Deborah’s hotel room, and at first it’s alright. They’re falling back into their groove.

And then they’re falling back into old habits. They’re reminded of the exact things that drove them apart in the first place. They do the thing divorced couples do: rehash old fights, slip into past versions of themselves, undoing any potential progress they’ve made. Ava informs Deborah she actually had to go to couples therapy with Ruby because of Deborah firing her and then never answering her texts. Ava tells Deborah she hurt her feelings by going No Contact, and you really feel her words…even if Deborah with her extreme intimacy issues cannot. Hacks is never cloying, but it often injects these more tender moments amid all its acidity.

They go their separate ways at episode’s end, but they find themselves still thinking about each other. Because yes, they hurt each other a lot in the past, but they learned a lot from each other, too, and those lessons end up having renewed resonance at episode’s end.

So, two exes reconnected and what happens next? A full-on, all new honeymoon phase. Episode two opens with a montage of Ava and Deborah obsessively texting each other jokes, punchups, observations, pithy remarks, updates, just about everything. Again, this sequence could easily be lifted and mapped onto a story about two exes thrown back into each other’s lives having a bit of an emotional affair. After all, Ava doesn’t tell Ruby who she’s talking to so much.

And Deborah is stepping out to talk to Ava in her own way, too. After first being asked to be a guest in the late night slot that she vied so hard to get earlier in the career before losing to a man, she finds herself suddenly tapped as fill-in host when the host gets sick. She’s thrown into an emergency writer’s room, but she ignores all their bad pitches as well as the mid pitches from her Ava replacements (played by Dylan Gelula and Jordan Gavaris, who frankly deserve more screentime than they get) to text and talk with Ava. The other writers are visibly annoyed about her choosing to creatively “cheat” on them with someone who isn’t even in the room. Just as Deborah is about to ask Ava to come by, Ava magically shows up, and the two get to work. It goes so well, Deborah asks Ava to come write for her again because the late night slot is opening up and she wants to fight for it. Ava has a hiatus from the show she’s working on coming up, so the timing is perfect.

Well, not quite so. Ava is supposed to spend that hiatus traveling abroad with Ruby, who will be shooting. In a classic sitcom-y snafu throughout the episode, Ava erroneously thinks Ruby is going to propose and spends the whole episode anticipating it. When Ruby at first balks at Ava saying she doesn’t want to come with her anymore, Ava tries to propose. The ring she found earlier in the episode though isn’t an engagement ring at all but rather a prop for the superhero series. It’s how Ruby’s character Wolfgirl gets her powers.

Ava and Ruby in Hacks season three

The failed proposal gag is funny, but then it’s deepened into something real when Ava reveals she’s going back to work with Deborah. Ava is shocked. The woman they were in couples therapy about? It’s a betrayal. Plus, she points out Ava and Deborah’s dynamic was toxic, borderline abusive. She slapped her. She was going to sue her. Deborah wasn’t just a difficult boss, and their working relationship wasn’t just tense. It was destructive. And while Ava is far from a perfect person — or even a good person most of the time — Ruby isn’t wrong about her characterization of their dynamic as being particularly harmful for Ava, with Deborah in a clear position of power over her. And now she’s sliding right back into that.

It speaks to the quality of writing on Hacks that I simultaneously agree with every single thing Ruby says and also root for Ava to go back to Deborah. It’s easy to be charmed by Ava and Deborah at their best, and throughout the episode they’re clicking in the exact way their creative partnership thrives on. Artistic collaboration often entails deep intimacy. Deborah and Ava are two people who don’t know how to go halfspeed on anything, so they dive right back into each other and start neglecting the other people in their lives. Ruby asks Ava for space, Ava’s reconnection with Deborah basically ending her relationship. She chooses Deborah, as she too often does.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Kayla Kumari Upadhyaya

Kayla Kumari Upadhyaya is the managing editor of Autostraddle and a lesbian writer of essays, short stories, and pop culture criticism living in Orlando. She is the assistant managing editor of TriQuarterly, and her short stories appear or are forthcoming in McSweeney's Quarterly Concern, Joyland, Catapult, The Offing, and more. Some of her pop culture writing can be found at The A.V. Club, Vulture, The Cut, and others. You can follow her on Twitter or Instagram and learn more about her work on her website.

Kayla has written 821 articles for us.

Hulu’s ‘Prom Dates’ Tries to Be ‘Superbad’ for Queer Girls

I love teen comedies. Growing up in the 90s and 00s, movies made for teens were top tier entertainment, and you could find me sat and ready. So when I heard about the new Hulu movie Prom Dates I was intrigued — the plot reminded me of my favorite movies from this golden era.

In Prom Dates, best friends Jess and Hannah (played by Antonia Gentry and Julia Lester respectively) hope to fulfill the pact they made when they were 13 to have the best prom ever. But now, it’s the day before, and both girls find themselves without dates. Determined to get things back on track, Jess and Hannah set out to find new dates, and chaos ensues.

Prom Dates is not a bad movie, but it’s also not a good movie. It feels like they were trying to go for a female-led Superbad, but the end result falls flat. The characters aren’t interesting enough, and I don’t think I did much more than chuckle the whole time.

The movie opens with young Jess and Hannah making their “prom pact” by cutting their palms open in a blood oath. Hannah cuts too deep and blood comes spurting out, eventually smeared down the chest of a female prom goer. (This isn’t the only time bodily fluids are played for the joke. Blood comes up again, as well as vomit.) Fast forward to the present. Jess is going to prom with the hottest guy at school in an attempt to win prom queen — even though it’s clear that he’s not that into her — and Hannah’s boyfriend Greg does a big promposal for Hannah — even though it’s clear she’s not that into him.

That evening, Jess finds out her hot boyfriend is cheating on her and promptly breaks up with him. Meanwhile, Greg tells Hannah he’s decided to go to Penn State instead of Stanford to be with her causing her to freak out and leave. The girls meet up at Hannah’s to regroup, and Hannah tells Jess she’s a lesbian. One of the reasons she freaked out about Greg transferring is because she was excited to live her best gay life in college, and now she’s afraid she’ll have to keep up the lie.

What comes next was my favorite moment of the movie. Jess tells Hannah she’s known she was a lesbian for a while, and when Hannah asks why she never said anything, Jess replies, “It’s not my story to tell.” That’s when they make their plan: They’re going to find new prom dates and still have their best prom ever. Jess will find a hot guy, and Hannah will find the lesbian of her dreams. Except Hannah already has a dream lesbian — it’s classmate Angie (played by Terry Hu, who you may remember from Never Have I Ever) who Hannah was fantasizing about before Greg’s promposal. But she decides she can’t ask Angie, and the girls set off.

This was the point where the movie lost it for me. Each new situation the girls find themselves in feels like it’s checking off a box from an imaginary list of things that teen comedies are supposed to have. The girls end up at a party being thrown by their former classmate known as Vodka Heather (played by Zión Moreno) that is filled with your typical teen movie debauchery. They are greeted at the door with shots, and Hannah begins drinking random alcohol she finds. She then encounters Heather, who peer pressures her into doing a bump of cocaine to make it easier to talk to girls. Hannah then has her first make out session that ends with an unfortunate surprise I shall leave unspoiled.

While I had higher hopes overall for a screenwriter who says they “spend most of their time being gay,” Hannah’s coming out storyline is done well. She admits to Jess that the first time Greg went down on her, she had to picture Rachel Weisz in The Mummy to orgasm, which felt real. (I did however wonder if Gen Zers are still using The Mummy as a gay awakening.) Julia Lester is queer and she brings an authenticity to Hannah, as she did playing queer on High School Musical: The Musical: The Series.

All in all, Prom Dates could have been a lot worse. If you’re looking for a mindless movie to put on and zone out to, this would be perfect. It’s just that in 2024, I’m hoping for something a little better than fine. Yes, I know that as an adult I’m not the intended audience, but I think teens also have higher standard. In the end, it didn’t live up to its premise — or the teen movies of decades past.


Prom Dates begins streaming on Hulu May 3.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Sa'iyda Shabazz

Sa'iyda is a writer and mom who lives in LA with her partner, son and 3 adorable, albeit very extra animals. She has yet to meet a chocolate chip cookie she doesn't like, spends her free time (lol) reading as many queer romances as she can, and has spent the better part of her life obsessed with late 90s pop culture.

Sa'iyda has written 119 articles for us.

22 Comments From Really Special People Who Think There’s Too Many Gay Characters On TV

GLAAD’s annual “Where We Are on TV” report was released this week, and was a bit bleak. We’re losing characters across scripted broadcast programming, and of all 468 LGBTQ characters counted across broadcast, cable and streaming networks, 36% won’t be returning due to cancellations, the miniseries/anthology format, or a character dying or otherwise exiting the show. We’ve talked a lot around here about how much these cancellations are f*cking our community, and recently listed more than 52 shows with lesbian and bisexual characters cancelled after one season.

But you wouldn’t know how desperately our community needs more LGBTQ+ characters on television from doing what I do every month, which is google all kinds of combinations of new show names and networks to figure out if they’re going to be showcasing LGBTQ characters. This is something I have to do to write the monthly streaming guide. And while those searches often turn out useful information, they also deliver, inevitably, a Reddit thread or Quora thread of people complaining about there being too many LGBTQ characters on television, or worrying that their favorite comic book is going to be “woke-ified” in its transition to television. Sometimes I copy and save my very favorite lines from these complaints to laugh at them and today seemed like a good moment to share them with the group.

The following excerpts have been ripped mercilessly out of context from comments on Quora, Reddit and other message boards about LGBTQ+ representation on television from homophobes who claim to not be homophobic.


1. “I’m not homofobic or anything like that but I’m sorry that isn’t the reality most people aren’t gay”

2. “I’m sick of the LGBTQIAZLWPD what the fuck ever. If you wanna scissor your girlfriend or puff each other’s peter… go do it. But, stop trying to shove the mess in my face.”

3. “When LGBTQ people talk about love, I cringe because they are always whining, complaining, and getting offended by everyone, every sentence, and every single normal shit.”

4. “At this point it feels like Apple is basically saying all Japanese women are homosexual which seems pretty darn racist to be honest.”

5. “As a straight man myself, I support gay rights and want people to be happy. But in real life, people keep their sex lives behind closed doors. So being forced to see men make out and have love scenes regularly now on TV makes me physically uncomfortable.”

6. “Tomorrow bestiality would start creeping into media, because apparently these hay-wired creative people would go overboard with their love for their pets.”

7. “I was watching a show the other day for the first time, I thought the plot was really cool, within the first two minutes a boy took another boy into his bedroom and they started kissing. Why?”

8. “enough we get it we are all equals thank you.”

9. “I’ve visited and stayed at the Disney World resort six or seven times; it seems they’ve taken a more drastic stance in the last few years as I don’t remember their push for gay this and gay that being so upfront and unceasingly…annoying.”

10. “Forcing Gay characters into all Netflix content makes me want to CANCEL IT! I should be able to EASILY FILTER GAY CONTENT!”

11. “There’s a gay person in every show now. That’s not even realistic. I rarely see someone who you can see is gay in my daily life. It’s ridiculous.”

12. “The media/Glam industry has so many Gay people at the top, they almost control the industry. So they go overboard and blow trumpets on everyone. This over representation sometimes backfires. Hence we have Gay pride parades, forced gay characters in every series.”

13. “Every show. EVERY single show has the SAME lesbian character and for some reason they think it’s cute to show long drawn out gratuitous kissing scenes. I don’t think I’ve seen a heterosexual love scene in a movie or television show in like 9 years!”

14. “I don’t care what you losers have to say, keep blowing each other.”

15. “I watched Killing Eve to the end on NF. But truth be told, if I had known nearly every female was going to be bi or lesbian, I would not have bothered.”

16. “9-1-1 has at least 13 lgbtq+ characters. I’m not taking a side in this. But by the numbers. That’s severe over representation. I am all for representation some of my favorite people are lgbt+. But just making characters that started out straight into queer characters for the sake of representation is disingenuous and hurts the cause.”

17. “I think the show-runners are actually exploiting lgbtq people. Like every scene I watch on these new shows that involves a gay person, the gay person is always dying to turn a corner and kiss their lover. I would be offended, and feel it’s insulting.”

18.Please don’t reject God. Submit to Jesus Christ and be FREE!

19. “I know gay people exist, I don’t need to be reminded every time I watch tv… Anyone thinking this makes me homophobic, I feel the same way about vegans and gluten intolerance. Just shut up already and leave the rest of us alone.”

20. “By breaking in our houses through TVs and forcing our brains to see gay people all the times, MANY PEOPLE BECAME GAY”

21. “I just want murder and mayhem not activism. If I want social commentary, there are plenty of avenues.”

22. “I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Being gay is NOT a personality.”

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Riese

Riese is the 41-year-old Co-Founder of Autostraddle.com as well as an award-winning writer, video-maker, LGBTQ+ Marketing consultant and aspiring cyber-performance artist who grew up in Michigan, lost her mind in New York and now lives in Los Angeles. Her work has appeared in nine books, magazines including Marie Claire and Curve, and all over the web including Nylon, Queerty, Nerve, Bitch, Emily Books and Jezebel. She had a very popular personal blog once upon a time, and then she recapped The L Word, and then she had the idea to make this place, and now here we all are! In 2016, she was nominated for a GLAAD Award for Outstanding Digital Journalism. She's Jewish and has a cute dog named Carol. Follow her on twitter and instagram.

Riese has written 3189 articles for us.

16 Comments

  1. Boy, do I WISH we had the kind of over-the-top, ubiquitous representation. These people say that we do. Also, according to them if we’re all going to be equals, we should cancel all street love scenes on TV! How would they like that one? Makes me so mad!

    • for real!!!! most of what they describe as their personal hell is my personal fantasy

  2. “I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Being gay is NOT a personality.”

    excuse me this is a personal attack

  3. Props to the guy who watched all of Killing Eve and then was like “if I had known this gay show was gay, which is absolutely clear from episode one…bb, I wouldn’t have bothered!”

    Pal, you bothered for THIRTY TWO WHOLE HOURS.

    But I am weirdly into “go overboard and blow trumpets on everyone” as gay culture?

    • like was this guy really watching it for like the stuff about M15 and The Twelve that the rest of us zoned out on entirely bc we were there for the characters and specifically their GaYnEss

  4. Haha eat it, number 19: I’m both gay and gluten intolerant.

    (Also “puffing their Peter” is an excellent euphemism I hadn’t heard before but instantly understood. It is a little masculine though.)

  5. The most out-there comment along these lines which I’ve ever seen was “There’s no reason to include a gay character unless your show is about molesting children”. I mean it might have been trolling, but still, OMG wut

  6. I probably shouldn’t be cracking up at these posts, but it’s hard not to.

    #1 It’s basically saying that it’s not true that most people aren’t gay, so the joke is on you, homophobe creeper.

    #5 Physically ill? Maybe you need to do some self reflection about why. Also, since when do straight people (especially on media) keep sexual stuff “behind closed doors”?

    #11 Seriously? Oh, never mind. I can’t even.

    #13 Yeah we definitely are suffering from a lack of hetero sex scenes. It’s like a national emergency.

    #19 I can’t even.

    #20 That’s right; it’s contagious. Lock up your wives and hide your daughters.

    • oh you are definitely supposed to be cracking up at these posts, i feel like these loons have no idea how funny they are!!

  7. I have seen such comments many times, sometimes I wonder if they are humans or robots who accept and believe whatever they are told. Because a person who does not think and does not have emotions is not a person.
    When they understand that a movie, series, game or animation has a queer character, they behave as if it is a weak work with all the characters being gay, like the animation Lightyear.
    Of course, I agree that Lightyear was not a quality animation, but at least it was better than The Super Mario Bros :)
    And if it is an action work and the queer character is a woman, they call it anti-male, like The Last of Us part II.
    The interesting thing is, if you ask those people about the story of the work, you will find that most of them have not seen that work.
    However, it’s hard to see a work you hate (because of queer characters).

  8. Unfortunately, the number of canceled queer works, especially queer women, is really high, I hope queers try to support better.
    Services like Netflix, Paramount or Disney are just looking for an excuse to immediately cancel those works, even sometimes they delete that work like the Willow.
    By supporting these works, we are not only repaying the kindness of those who worked hard to make these works for us, but sometimes that work is also a gift to future generations.
    For example, I watched She-Ra and the Princesses of Power a few years ago, and I’m really grateful to everyone who made it.
    But because of the people who supported and watched it, I was able to see that wonderful animation, those lovable characters, that masterpiece final episode and that unique final kiss which is the best kiss I’ve ever seen.
    If this animation was canceled, I would never be able to see any of them, I can only say thank you for not letting the animation be canceled.

  9. Omg, imagine being able to ” EASILY FILTER GAY CONTENT!” to the degree that “I don’t think I’ve seen a heterosexual love scene in a movie or television show in like 9 years!”…that is the goal, #s 10 and 13, not a problem!

Comments are closed.

May 2024: What’s New, Gay and Streaming on Netflix, Max, Prime Video, Hulu, Paramount+, Apple TV and Peacock

It’s the first of May, a beautiful day in which we might want to say, what’s gonna be gay on our teevees today? Well I have that information for you in what is a surprisingly robust slate of television shows and cinema films available streaming on Netflix, Hulu, HBO Max, Prime Video, Apple TV+, Peacock and Paramount+Showtime.

Also BIG NEWS which’s that we’re debuting some brand new newsletters this month for AF+ members including one about TV from me and one about film from Drew and if you wanna get on those lists, you can do so right here.


Netflix Will Deliver This Unto The Gays in May 2024

Beautiful Rebel (2024) // May 2nd
This Italian musical biopic covers the life and groundbreaking career of queer Italian rock star Gianna Nannini, “one of the most incisive and renowned voices of our music.” Telling her story from childhood into the roots of her life and consecration, Beautiful Rebel promises to “takes the audience on a journey into the life and creative mind of a woman capable of shaping emotions with poetry and music.”

Lola (2024) // May 2nd
Nicola Peltz Beckham’s directorial debut is set in the Los Angeles suburbs and stars Nicola Peltz Beckham as Lola James, a 19-year-old struggling to earn the money necessary to get her gender-nonconforming younger sibling, Arlo (Luke David Blumm), out of the home they share with her alcoholic and super-religious mother.

Bodkin: Limited Series // May 9
A crew of podcasters are investigating a murder in a small Irish town in this darkly comedic thriller in which “our heroes try to discern fact from fiction – about the case, about their colleagues, and, most painfully, themselves.”  Siobhán Cullen is Dove, a lesbian “hard nosed investigative journalist” who is very skeptical of everybody and also authority and hypocrisy. She’s been thrown onto this podcast project against her will after tragic fallout to a story she’d covered as a journalist.

A Simple Favor (2018) // May 19
Classic bisexual film A Simple Favor stars Blake Lively as a charismatic and intriguing hottie who wears 17-piece suits and Anna Kendrick is a mommy blogger who’s kid befriends Blake’s kid but then Blake goes missing and it’s pretty wild, I highly recommend!


HBO Max’s LGBTQ+ TV and Movies For May 2024

Hacks: Season Three Premiere // May 2
Season Three begins with Deborah Vance as “a newly world-beating comedian operating solo” and Ava staffed on a “Last Week Tonight”-esque late-night comedy show, but of course they will be brought back together again as Deborah’s career takes off and she finally has the opportunity to do her own late-night show again. According to Variety, Season Three finds Ava “alternately acting as mastermind, cheerleader and occasional best frenemy,” a position that “gives this season its crackle and verve, and brings new life into a show that’s been off the air for two years.” Also Christina Hendricks is mounting her in the trailer? We’ll also be getting more of deeply beloved queer actor Megan Stalter!

Pretty Little Liars Summer School: Season 2 Premiere // May 9
The girls from Pretty Little Liars: Original Sin are back and this time they’re headed to summer school, but there’s a new villain in town who might have a connection to A and will put all of their relationships with each other to the test. Queer character Mouse is returning, as is her trans boyfriend Ash, and in the trailer we’ve also got Noa kissing a new character Jen (queer actor Ava Capri), her former “juvie cell mate” who returns to school and “draws Noa into messy drama.” (You may recognize Capri from her queer storyline in Love, Victor.)

Thirst With Shay Mitchell: Season One // May 23rd
Queer actor Shay Mitchell is “exploring the world one drink at a time” as she visits exciting locations, samples unique ingredients, encountering new drink trends, the best bars and 8,000 years of sipping history.


Hulu’s LGBTQ+ May 2024

Jeopardy! Masters: Season Two Premiere // May 2
Debuting on May 1st on ABC, Jeopardy! Masters will feature the six highest-ranking current Jeopardy! contestants competing across ten episodes.This will include non-binary Canadian competitor Mattea Roach and the legendary trans lesbian contestant Amy Schneider.

Prom Dates (2024) // May 3
Best friends Jess and Hannah (queer actor Julia Lester) want to have the perfect senior prom because of a pact they made 13 years ago, which’s a bit silly but ok! 24 hours prior to the big event, their plans fall apart when both girls break up with their dates — Hannah doing so because she is in fact gay — and they’ve got a small window in which to find new dates. And now she’s got her eye on a hottie played by Terry Hu.

Black Twitter: A People’s History: Complete Docuseries // May 9
Based on Jason Parham’s WIRED article “A People’s History of Black Twitter,” this docuseries looks at the rise, the movements, the memes, the jokes and the voices that turned Black Twitter into “an influential and dominant force in nearly every aspect of American political and cultural life.” Talking heads include Jenna Wortham, Raquel Willis and Roxane Gay.

Eileen (2023) // May 10
I will be honest I hated this movie but your mileage may vary! It’s more homoerotic than explicitly gay, set in 1960s Massachusetts and following the relationship between two women working in a juvenile detention facility. Eileen is a depressed oddball living with her terrible father ostracized by her peers. She becomes enchanted by a new psychologist, Rebecca Saint John (Anne Hathaway), who joins the prison staff.


Paramount+ Showtime’s LGBTQ+ TV

The Chi: Season 6B Premiere // May 10
In September, Natalie declared Season Six of The Chi “better and gayer” than previous seasons, which we hope will to continue when Brittany, Nina and Dre return when the second batch of Season Six episodes drop in May.

RuPaul’s Drag Race: All Stars: Season 9 // May 17
Eight returning queens will be competing not only for their own prize money but also for a $200k gift to a charity of their choice. The queens duking it out for top prize are Angeria Paris VanMicheals, Gottmik, Jorgeous, Nina West, Plastique Tiara, Roxxxy Andrews, Shannel and Vanessa Vanjie.


Prime Video’s Queer TV and Cinema

Outer Range: Season 2 //  May 16
In Season Two, the Abbotts begin their search for Amy, who disappeared in last season’s finale, and leaning into its supernatural elements. While keeping things as unclear as possible, Prime Video has promised: “Building on Season 1’s thoughtfully laid foundation that set the central mystery in motion, comes an invigorating sophomore season full of payoffs, grounded twists, and liberated character journeys.” Tamara Podemski plays lesbian character Deputy Sheriff Joy Hawk.

Bombshell (2019)
Kate McKinnon plays a lesbian reporter stuck working at Fox News when a new staffer decides it’s time to fight back against CEO Roger Ailes’s rampant sexual harassment of the channel’s talent.

Outlaws: Season 3 // May 31
The Outlaws attempt to move on with their lives while crime boss The Dean awaits trial, but then one of their own returns with a deadly secret, hurling them back into mortal danger! Yikes! They’ve gotta prove their innocence before The Dean’s case collapses and he comes out looking for revenge. Eleanor Tomlinson returns as lesbian influencer Gabrielle Penrose-Howe.


Peacock’s Queer Show

We Are Lady Parts: Season 2 // May 30
It has been a minute since we last had the gift of spending time with this series about an all-female Muslim punk band with a queer drummer. Natalie wrote that Season One has storylines that “fill an often undervalued aspect of representation: offering a reminder that inside each of us, is all of us.” showrunner Nida Manzoor promises a “bolder, sillier, darker and deeper” season two that’ll explore the interior lives of each of the women in more depth.


Apple TV+

Acapulco: Season 3 Premiere // May 1 
This charming bilingual comedy hasn’t ever gotten the appreciation it deserves. As Season Three begins, the present-tense narrative finds Maximo returning to a Las Colinas he no longer recognizes. In the 1985 story, young Maximo is still climbing the ladder of success while potentially jeopardizing his relationships. What is important of course to all of us here is that his sister, Sara Gallardo Ramos, is a lesbian, and has a pretty prominent role in the series!


Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Riese

Riese is the 41-year-old Co-Founder of Autostraddle.com as well as an award-winning writer, video-maker, LGBTQ+ Marketing consultant and aspiring cyber-performance artist who grew up in Michigan, lost her mind in New York and now lives in Los Angeles. Her work has appeared in nine books, magazines including Marie Claire and Curve, and all over the web including Nylon, Queerty, Nerve, Bitch, Emily Books and Jezebel. She had a very popular personal blog once upon a time, and then she recapped The L Word, and then she had the idea to make this place, and now here we all are! In 2016, she was nominated for a GLAAD Award for Outstanding Digital Journalism. She's Jewish and has a cute dog named Carol. Follow her on twitter and instagram.

Riese has written 3189 articles for us.

7 Comments

  1. SO ready for We Are Lady Parts! Literally going to switch from registered non-user to paying the license fee for this (UK over here)

  2. Very excited for the return of Hacks and We Are Lady Parts!

    UK viewers might be interested to know I Kissed a Girl starts on 5 May on BBC Three and iPLayer (not sure if/when it will be available outside of the UK). I’m not big into reality dating shows – the queer series of The Ultimatum is the only one I’ve watched – but I saw this billed as ‘the UK’s first dating show for girls who like girls’ and that’s enough for me to give it a try.

    • ooooh yeah i have seen little rumblings about that show, we will look into it!

  3. Jurassic World Chaos Theory and I Kissed A Girl should have been on the list.
    And as usual, Netflix has nothing special. I am still waiting for a new series from Netflix that will not be canceled :D
    But strangely, even though there are so many series in this month, none of them can really be labeled as lesbian romance
    For example, Hacks is the story of a one-sided love :D
    Outlaws has only one lesbian character and that’s it :)
    The only queer main character in the first season of Pretty Little Liars is in a heterosexual relationship (although it would be better if they developed this relationship since the two actors are also in a relationship in real life).
    Outer Range is the only series that has a lesbian couple, but they are rarely discussed, and I haven’t seen the rest of the series.
    I just hope Jurassic World Chaos Theory sequel Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous doesn’t get cancelled :)

    • I hadn’t heard about Jurassic World Chaos Theory, but loved Camp Cretaceous, so will definitely check it out!

Comments are closed.

No Filter: Billie Eilish Is Thriving

feature image of Billie Eilish via Eilish’s Instagram

Welcome back to No Filter, and happy best month ever! (Yes, I was born in May.) What is No Filter, you ask? Why, it’s the place where I put all the best content from Instagram from some of our favorite famous queers! Let’s rock and roll!


Lena, I need that sweater so bad you don’t even KNOW. Also please tell Debbie I said hello!


New Kehlani video, and those visuals are giving huge Missy Elliott’s “Supa Dupa Fly,” which I love!


Shoutout to this Billie Eilish era.


They are too in love! It hurts my feelings!


Ali please I beg of you, gimme all the outfits you got! I need them and for a good reason; I promise!


Hard launch? Soft launch?


Welcome to No Filter, Sophia! Thrilled to have you here!


Alright Keke, you have taken this Angela Basset impression too far! You must be stopped.


It is really shocking how 94% of my life feels so much easier right now and it is simply due to the sun!!


Let’s talk about how much I personally needed to see this — it was a lot.


https://www.instagram.com/cynthiaenixon/reel/C6Mx8E1vK4P/

Cynthia Nixon, I love you!!


I went to my first Ren Faire last fall and this…did not happen to me? No fair??


This is possibly my favorite picture ever. I don’t know what it is, but eye personally cannot stop giggling.


We are in a new and thrilling time of a lot frozen candy? I, like Kirsten, prefer a chew tbh!


Thank you for these gifts, Hacks Season 3 press tour!


A human mic stand…let’s hear it for human innovation.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Christina Tucker

Christina Tucker is writer and podcaster living in Philadelphia. Find her on Twitter or Instagram!

Christina has written 283 articles for us.

2 Comments

  1. So that Sophia Bush post really spoke to me, as a trans woman… I do not know what exactly she’s referring to (sounds like some kind of trauma recovery) but I suspect this is more anecdotes than at least for me, gender dysphoria is actually gender trauma, or at least functions like it…

  2. Roberta Colindrez…..now Naomi McPherson…. Kate Berlant’s really out here living the dream

Comments are closed.

‘Dead Boy Detectives’ Has a Goth Lesbian Butcher, Gay Ghosts, and a Cheryl Dunye-Directed Episode

I went into Dead Boy Detectives knowing there would be boy gays (Dead Boy gays, specifically), so imagine my surprise and delight when lady gays showed up as well! This cute fantasy show ticked a lot of boxes for me, but before we get into it, a little history.

The titular Dead Boy Detectives first appeared in the Neil Gaiman DC comic Sandman and later had some stories of their own. As such, this show is set in the same universe as the TV adaptation of that comic, The Sandman, with some crossover characters like Death (played by Kirby) and Despair (Donna Preston) making an appearance. But, since it was a DC Comic, these characters, played by different actors, also showed up in the show Doom Patrol, which I believe is where the idea of one boy having unrequited love for the other originated, as I can’t find any evidence that was the case in the graphic novels. What’s funny is, when Edwin, Charles, and their human psychic counterpart Crystal Palace showed up in Doom Patrol, I thought to myself, “I’d watch a whole show of this.” And luckily, I didn’t have to wait all that long! While the main trio were recast for the show, there is a nod to the Doom Patrol version in the Night Nurse, played by Ruth Connell in both versions. In other gay-adjacent cast news, Sherri Saum of The Fosters is in a couple of episodes. But in bigger gay news: An episode was directed by Cheryl Dunye, lesbian writer and director of The Watermelon Woman.

In all iterations, the general premise remains the same: Edwin, a ghost who died in 1916, and Charles, who died in 1989, join forces with human psychic Crystal Palace to solve mysteries. In the Doom Patrol version, they were already an established trio, but in Netflix’s Dead Boy Detectives, we get a bit of an origin story. In fact, Edwin (George Rexstrew) is resistant to allow Crystal (Kassius Nelson) to join, claiming adding a human to their mix will just complicate things, when the truth is he’s a bit jealous of the attention Charles (Jayden Revri) is giving the pretty stranger.

A case takes the newly formed trio to Port Townsend to solve the mystery of a missing girl, and despite their previous ability to travel through mirrors, because of a bit of mystical mayhem, they get trapped in the town, forced to contend with local nuisances like an ancient witch determined to obtain immortality and ageless beauty, a Cat King who has the hots Edwin, and more ghostly mysteries than one detective agency can handle.

Dead Boy Detectives: Crystal, Niko, Edwin and Charles

I’d take my mysterious mysteries to this group!! Photo courtesy of Netflix © 2023

Since they’re going to be in town a while, Crystal rents a room for cheap above a butcher shop, run by a goth lesbian named Jenny, played by Briana Cuoco, who voices Batgirl in Harley Quinn and who starred alongside her sister Kaley in a few episodes of The Flight Attendant. (Briana is, ironically, a vegetarian, which I learned in the comments of this BTS IG post she made.) Jenny’s whole vibe visually reminds me a bit of Charlotte Sullivan’s character Nicole in the Canadian gem Mary Kills People, and I, for one, am here for it.

Dead Boy Detectives: Jenny the lesbian goth butcher standing in profile against the neon glow of a meat sign

I’m a vegetarian (hence the woeful lack of meat puns in this article) but I am INTO the goth lesbian butcher vibe. Photo courtesy of Netflix © 2023

Jenny is reluctantly renting out the two rooms she has available to teenagers (Crystal, and her new neighbor Niko), who definitely should be in school but somehow are not, and despite her best efforts to give them the cold shoulder, it’s clear she cares about their safety and wellbeing as she gets pulled deeper and deeper into their antics as the season goes on.

We learn Jenny is a lesbian when she starts receiving love letters from a secret admirer. Niko decides she wants to figure out who these love letters are from, but Jenny is sure she doesn’t want to know. She says she knows every eligible bachelorette in town already: the perils of being gay in a small town. Besides, she’s enjoying these letters, and what if taking it further ruins the magic?

Dead Boy Detectives: Jenny looks smitten by the lesbian love letter she's reading

Hard on the outside, soft on the inside, is my entire type. I was doomed from the start. Photo courtesy of Netflix © 2023

But Niko meddles anyway, and they discover the secret admirer is Maxine, the eager librarian, and Niko convinces Jenny to go on one (1) date with her before writing her off entirely. The date starts off really cute, Jenny surprisingly shy, and it even touches on one of my favorite romance tropes when Maxine asks, “Can I kiss you?”

Dead Boy Detectives: Jenny and Maxine go in for the kiss

“Can I kiss you” gets me every time, I blame Now & Then.

It does unfortunately take a turn I won’t spoil for you here, but Jenny becomes more entangled in the Dead Boy Detective Agency antics, and for that I’m grateful. She is easily and consistently one of the funniest parts of the show, often pointing out how ridiculous Crystal and Niko sound when they’re talking to the boys (because Jenny can’t see them and assumes the girls are losing their minds.)  “Adult reluctantly takes responsibility for teens in over their heads” is one of my favorite themes in shows like these.

Despite previously doing her best to stay out of whatever the kids were up to, when Jenny finds out Crystal intends to stomp off to confront her abusive ex alone, Jenny decides to tag along. And when the girls have to rush off to save the boys, she hands them each a meat cleaver…just in case.

Dead Boy Detectives: Jenny holds up a meat cleaver

She can cleave my heart in two any day. Photo courtesy of Netflix © 2023

Jenny didn’t ask for this responsibility and often didn’t feel up for the challenge, but in the end she cares about these teens, and it shows.

Jenny could have very easily been a caricature — an overly grumpy goth, the Angry Lesbian trope — but Briana Cuoco plays her brilliantly and never crosses that line. Even Jenny’s early attempts at seeming exasperated are tinged in thinly veiled worry. Who knew “goth lesbian butcher” could have so many beautiful layers.

Dead Boy Detectives: Jenny looks serious in her blood-spattered shirt

Beautiful, blood-soaked layers.

Overall, the show is really fun. It has supernatural case-of-the-week style mysteries, plus overarching enemies to contend with. It has themes of loss and identity and trauma, all while being funny and irreverent in between its serious moments. And even though we’re here to talk about the sapphic of it all, Edwin’s queerness should also be celebrated. His story was very different from Jenny’s, as he spends most of the season coming out to himself before he can even consider going on dates, good or bad, but it’s all very sweet and tender and heartbreaking and joyful.

I really hope this show gets more seasons. I think the concept lends itself to a multi-season run, and there are still a lot of adventures to be had. I know the #CancelYourGays epidemic has only been getting worse in recent months, but I’m hoping that with the success of its parent show, Sandman, and Neil Gaiman’s general run of popularity lately, that this isn’t ill-placed hope.

I may be a vegetarian, but I want more of this goth lesbian butcher!

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Valerie Anne

Just a TV-loving, Twitter-addicted nerd who loves reading, watching, and writing about stories. One part Kara Danvers, two parts Waverly Earp, a dash of Cosima and an extra helping of my own brand of weirdo.

Valerie has written 552 articles for us.

4 Comments

  1. So now we have a goth lesbian butcher…

    to go with our punk lesbian butcher.

    Lesbian butchers might just become a thing.

  2. Personally, I am tired of seeing queer women die in movies and series.
    The producers themselves are not tired of repeating this repetitive stereotype.
    I feel like the number of dead queer women characters has surpassed the number of dead straight characters :D
    As far as I know, Netflix and Mike Flanagan are the record holders in this field :D
    Unfortunately, Netflix kills queer women characters in its works and cancels queer women series easily, in other words, it kills queer women in two different ways.
    That’s why I don’t like Netflix. Netflix has become very anti-lesbian since 2020.

  3. I binged it and really enjoyed it but Netflix put nothing into advertising it so it’s likely dead on arrival like ‘Lockwood & Co’.

  4. “She can cleave my heart in two any day” … “Beautiful, blood-soaked layers”

    Well done !

Comments are closed.

Queer Horoscopes for May 2024

In the midst of this grinding year May gives us some glimmers of excitement. The astro weather is still big and transformative, but this month we’ve got fewer earthquakes and a few more rainbows. As Jupiter moves into Gemini on the 25th, we’re entering a year of increased enthusiasm for all kinds of new and interesting connections. Gemini’s role is to help us combat stagnation and dogmatism—it doesn’t settle for easy answers and resists boredom at all costs. Jupiter, gay cheerleader of the cosmos, boosts and sustains whatever it touches. Jupiter is also interested in how we achieve the specific kind of joy that Spinoza liked to write about—not just pleasure or having fun, but feeling an expanded sense of your own capacity. When Jupiter is in Gemini, we can all expect more (and more interesting) thinking, conversation, questioning, and socializing. Gemini’s highest goal is to increase our sense of wonder, but its shadow side can get lost in the weeds. Jupiter steers us more closely toward what’s meaningful, while Gemini keeps the vibes more like a dance party than a TED talk.

We are in the midst of such vast, slow cultural changes that it can be hard to reorient, hard to adjust our vision. The pace of life on social media is out of step with the pace of our bodies and hearts. The amount of pain and crisis we’re able to hold energetically far outweighs what we can impact personally. But this month’s astrology rewards any intervention we can make—asking us to risk not knowing, to be unsure, to keep questioning not to shut down an idea but to help it blossom. Our imaginations need to expand to meet the rapidly changing world. Jupiter in Gemini is here to help us get a little more wild, a little more creative, a little more curious, and to create worlds we haven’t yet experienced.

In this spirit of adventure and celebration, I’d like to shout out the many encampments happening right now across college campuses in the US. Every collective action is an experiment in new ways of relating to each other. If I were going to raise a toast to anything right now, it would be the way people find each other and increase their collective capacity—despite interpersonal conflicts, despite ideological differences, despite a thousand ways these gatherings perpetuate the same harms baked into our culture. As Jupiter moves to Gemini, I invite you to actively seek out what there is to celebrate and how you’d like to encounter newness in your life. Happy May Day, happy Beltane, happy Omer counting, may this May expand your capacity.

My books are open for clients this month so do reach out if you’d like personalized support. I’ve also got deep dives into the astro weather of each month on my Patreon and you can follow me on Instagram to stay in the know.

Queer horoscopes: Stylized image of the Aries symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Aries

Expect more: Fast-paced, social, bustling times. As Jupiter moves into Gemini you’ll likely be busier texting, calling, planning, and schmoozing. But this is also a good month to expect more from your interactions—Jupiter is interested in meaning, not just chatter. Reach for your growth edges and reach for others—you may be surprised by what you learn. This is also an excellent transit for anyone who writes (songs, poems, novels) or communicates (educators, counselors, translators) as a core way of life. Embrace new ideas and enjoy the boost Jupiter lends to your thinking and perception.

Stylized image of the Taurus symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Taurus

Expect more: Courage to reach for what you need. Jupiter in Gemini stimulates risk-taking and curiosity about the new (not exactly your usual mode), but it’s also lighting up your second house of resources, stability, and abundance—things that are very important to you. As Jupiter moves out of your sign you’ve reached a certain level of self-awareness and personal growth that can assist you as you now branch out toward new possibilities—whether that’s looking for new home, a new income source, or a new commitment to someone else, there’s something on the horizon that can offer you an increased sense that you have what you need to thrive.

Stylized image of the Gemini symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Gemini

Expect more: Self-discovery and self-expression. As Jupiter moves into your sign you’re core sense of identity is expanding and unfolding in new ways. Jupiter rules Sagittarius, your opposing sign, so this expansion is more intuitive than intellectual—not always your comfort zone. Over the next year you’ll be learning to trust your gut more, to reach for what feels right instead of getting lost in the infinite possibilities, and to explore new facets of your self with confidence. Pay attention this month to new ideas of where you might be headed and don’t be afraid to follow them where they lead you.

Stylized image of the Cancer symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Cancer

Expect more: Restorative downtime. Although Jupiter is expansive and Gemini is active, the energetic boost your getting is toward your connection with all things beyond ordinary reality: beyond your daily responsibilities and relationship dynamics, beyond what you’re striving for and what you’re trying to balance, beyond all that effort to be a human and find the best path forward. Instead, you’re being called to notice and attune to things that feel not-quite-of-this-world. You may need to sleep more, meditate more, or spend more time being quiet under some trees or on a beach. This restorative connection to what is larger than you isn’t like a weekend reset to help you be more productive later—rather, it’s asking you to dramatically reshape your priorities.

Stylized image of the Leo symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Leo

Expect more: Collaboration and collectivity. You’ll find more joy and more meaning in working as a group than striking out alone right now. You may need to soothe some bruised egos (possibly your own), but what you can create together will be worth it. If you’re engaged in activism and protest right now, do what you can to strengthen your social bonds. Make sure everyone feels heard, cared for, and well fed. Handle inevitable conflict with respect. Know that there will always be at least one person in any group who really gets on your nerves—do your best to not get riled and keep your focus on what you’re here to do.

Queer horoscopes: Stylized image of the Virgo symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Virgo

Expect more: Recognition for your talents. Expect what you do, say, and know to be more visible right now, for better or worse. If you’re feeling confident and have something in mind you want to be known for (or help promote), this is an excellent time to speak up. Don’t get deterred by impostor syndrome, or by feeling that whatever you’re offering up to the public has to be perfect. Choose what has the most momentum, most meaning, and feels most important to you right now—then trust it will get where it needs to go, become what it needs to be.

Stylized image of the Libra symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Libra

Expect more: Opportunities to travel, explore, and expand your horizons. Jupiter in Gemini wants you to be ready for adventure, to keep a bag packed with snacks and a passport and make sure you’ve got someone to water your plants. If you can’t travel this month, it’s an excellent time to take a class, learn a language, or pick up that thick book you’ve been meaning to finish. The most restorative thing you can do right now is remember there’s more to life than what you already know of it.

Queer horoscopes: Stylized image of the Scorpio symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Scorpio

Expect more: Depth of connection, emotional honesty, and opportunities to let go of shit you’ve been carrying around too long. Jupiter moving to Gemini means you’re more aware of that part of your nature that will suffer no fools—you’re ready to go deep or go home and you should expect friends, lovers, and colleagues to treat you with the honesty and respect we all deserve. As you unburden yourself from old patterns, old habits, and old pain you’ll be opening up to much better experiences in the future. Don’t be afraid to let go of something that’s dragging out or dragging you down—there’s more joy to be had by saying goodbye (even if it’s just to some clothes that don’t fit you anymore).

Queer horoscopes: Stylized image of the Sagittarius symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Sagittarius

Expect more: Intimacy, big shared life plans, saying yes. With Jupiter’s move to Gemini you’re experiencing expansion and growth in your most important relationships—your ride-or-die BFF, your platonic life partner, your stable poly triad, your bandmate, your queer land collective—all the people you rely on and who rely on you. You may feel more ready now to commit, to take on responsibilities, and to trust that your beloved/s are going to have your back, too. Notice what feels possible now, celebrate the love you have, and remember you don’t have to move too fast.

Stylized image of the Capricorn symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Capricorn

Expect more: Joy in daily pleasures and routines, feeling able to meet the day’s demands, and rekindling of interest in a worthwhile act of service. As Jupiter moves to Gemini it’s lighting up the part of you that knows how to move through time with skill and attention instead of just feeling buried under a mountain of to-do lists. You’ll be better attuned to what actually needs doing, what isn’t your responsibility, and how to enjoy all the small moments. There’s also a good chance you’ll reconnect to something—a cause, an idea, a creative project, a healing modality—that you’ve always loved and now feel ready to deepen into.

Stylized image of the Aquarius symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Aquarius

Expect more: Creativity, flirtation, and time to explore both. It can be easy to discount “fun” as frivolous while there is so much crisis in the world, and I’m not telling you to stop pursuing justice or struggling with the harder ethics and issues of our times. But while you’re in that for the long haul, this month would like to offer you a little treat—like some oranges and a cookie from the snack and hydration station along a marathon. Jupiter in your fifth house stimulates the desire to feel passionately about what you’re doing, and to make room for pleasure, play, and possibly some romance along the way.

Queer horoscopes: Stylized image of the Pisces symbol over an abstract freeform purple shape

Pisces

Expect more: Coziness, shoes-off-slippers-on, texting “sorry I’m staying in for the night” at 6pm. This month offers you glorious reconnection to your inner world—the places in your mind and body that make you happy to be here. Let yourself slow down a little, knowing there’s still urgency in the world worth showing up for. Remember that you get to inhabit these moments in your life fully. Come back home to yourself.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Corina Dross

Corina Dross is an astrologer, artist, and writer who spends as much time as possible in libraries or under trees. They offer astrological consultations, intuitive guidance, and creative coaching to clients worldwide. Corina is also one-half of a sibling art collaboration, Abacus Corvus. You can learn about their current work and offerings at www.flaxandgold.com.

Corina has written 104 articles for us.

Mini Crossword is Gayotic

It’s harder to deter gents.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Emet Ozar

Emet is a queer and genderqueer program manager, crossword constructor, and married parent to four children.

Emet has written 28 articles for us.

1 Comment

  1. 2:16. Harder than I expected for the size!

    Also the dad joke is a real groaner, congrats.

Comments are closed.

How To Know When To Block Your Ex on Social Media

Ah yes, you’ve just gone through a big gay breakup and you’re not sure what to do about social media protocols. You may find yourself obsessively checking your ex’s feed for evidence of how much they have/have not moved on. You’re wondering if it’s okay to block your ex or if you should just ignore them. You may find yourself obsessively posting to your own feed just to show how much you have/have not moved on… and hoping they’ll sneak a peek. Look, I’m not judging. At some point in life, I’ve done just about every bad social media breakup habit in the book. Let me offer some words of wisdom from my own experiences and from some friends I tapped for thoughts on how to set yourself up for success when it comes to social media ex relations in the wake of a breakup.

Is It Okay To Block My Ex?

First thing’s first: Blocking is not a violence. Sometimes when you block an ex, you might be met with hurt feelings, questions, or messages of confusion. If an ex overreacts to a social media block, it could be evidence you need even more firm boundaries and might consider going full No Contact.

You can choose to block an ex for any reason: not wanting to see their content, not wanting them to see your content, or just not wanting any direct line of communication to be open. Blocking sounds intense and has all sorts of negative connotations (and can definitely lead to legitimate drama in various situations!), but it’s really no different than telling an ex you don’t want to see them in person, attend the same events as them, etc.

Blocking only becomes a bit questionable is if it goes against clear expectations and boundaries you’ve already set with an ex. Say, for example, you’ve stated you want to remain friends and work on maintaining a healthy relationship where you actively still see each other and talk. A block might blindside in this scenario. Still, if a block is what you need, just have a conversation about changing/renegotiating your needs and wants with your ex so it’s less of a blindside. You can always take space apart before deciding to pursue the friends route. In fact, anecdotally, I think the best way to stay friends with an ex is to first take a long break from each other.

Blocking is also questionable if it’s being used in ways to manipulate or leverage an ex, so avoid using it as a threat or ultimatum. Make the decision on your terms rather than involving them.

When You Should Mute Your Ex Instead of Blocking

In a lot of breakup scenarios, muting can be the best route. If you’re heartbroken but not necessarily angry and the relationship or breakup wasn’t damaging to your mental health and you have decent self-control when it comes to social media and exes — muting might be right for you.

My coworker Motti shared a story about when muting was the best option after their breakup:

I’m a muter, not a blocker. To save myself from the pain of seeing them with cute new dates or doing things we used to do together, etc., I just mute so I don’t get their posts in my feed and I don’t see their stories when I’m clicking through my friends’ stories. This is especially crucial in the first three weeks of the breakup.

I made the mistake of not doing this after my first gay breakup, and I got to see every single story and post of my ex going on new dates and forming a new relationship right in front of my eyes. We were trying to be friends, and she wasn’t doing anything wrong. Sure, she moved on quick, but she didn’t owe me shit. I was so focused on wanting to create a friendship that I thought being connected on socials was crucial to that, but in fact, it’s what made it clunky and messy. If I just wasn’t seeing this stuff, I wouldn’t have gotten anxious and obsessive about it.

Muting is perfect because what I was affected by the most was the “blindsided” of it all. I would be carrying about my day, being in class or at work or chilling at home, checking new stories or what’s on my feed, and BAM an adorable post with her new girlfriend who, my friends wouldn’t let me forget, looked a lot like me. It was the surprise of it all. And then, of course, I was in a classroom or at work and therefore not in a safe or comfy place to take care of myself or decompress, so then it became an issue where I was ruminating on what I had seen. With muting, if I wanted to take a look or check on what was going on, I could do it on my own terms, from the comfort of my own home where if I saw something I didn’t like, I would be in a better place to react to it.

Again, she didn’t owe me anything, so muting her and letting her continue with her life (as she should) allowed me to take a step back and get some air after the breakup. This is the advice I give to all my friends!

When Muting an Ex Doesn’t Quite Cut It

I like that Motti notes that muting allowed them to choose when and where they looked at or engaged with an ex’s post, because for some of us, that requires an immense amount of self-control that we might not have at this moment in time. If you feel like you can’t curb the urge to check up on your ex and doing so is putting you in an obsessive, unhealthy, and perhaps even toxic mindset, it’s best to block. Muting means you won’t be blindsided, as Motti described it. But it means you can still manually go look at your ex’s content.

Here are some questions to ask yourself:

  • Are you going out of your way to check your ex’s social media several times a day? Why?
  • How does it make you feel when you look at your ex’s content?
  • Would you be comfortable with your ex knowing how often you’re looking at their content? Does it come off as a little cyberstalky?

Again, no judgment, but the last thing you want to be is the overbearing surveillance ex, which brings me to the next instance where a mute might not cut it: if your ex is being the overbearing surveillance ex.

Surveillance! We don’t like when the state does it, and we don’t like (usually) when our exes do it. Is your ex obsessively watching your stories and then texting you about them to ask invasive questions or comment on what you’re doing with your life in a way that feels uncomfortable? These behaviors could lead to escalation, like your ex showing up where you are or interfering in your other relationships. Try to spot the signs of surveillance early and get ahead of it with a block: excessive or aggressive comments on posts, texts alluding to your social media behaviors, or a lack of social media boundaries.

Whether you’re being the surveillance ex or your ex is, it’s best to block!

In instances of abusive exes or really bad breakups that result (or should result) in No Contact, skip the muting stage and head straight to block.

Restricting, Soft Blocking and Other Options Between Muting and Blocking

Instagram in particular has a few different features that are somewhere between muting and blocking that could work best for your breakup situation. You can choose just to hide your story from your ex if you’re okay with them seeing occasional grid posts but don’t necessarily want them knowing what you’re up to in real time. You can (and should for a bit, probably, unless you’re immediately good friends with your ex) exclude them from your Close Friends list, especially if you’re wanting to do post-breakup thirst traps or emo posts (been there!).

Instagram also lets you “restrict” a person, which is an ideal option if you want to limit your ex’s presence in your life but also in a way that they can’t easily detect. People can realize they’re blocked pretty easily. It’s harder for them to know they’re muted or restricted.

Whereas muting has more to do with limiting your access to their posts, restricting limits their access to your posts without being as blunt as a block. If you restrict someone, they can still see and comment on your posts, but it will only be visible to them. Others won’t be able to see their comments, and you can only if you click the “see comments” button on hidden comments. They also won’t be able to see when you’re online or if you’ve read their messages. You also won’t receive notifications for any of their engagement.

“Soft blocking” is also an option for cutting off your ex’s access to you. Soft blocking is when you block and then immediately unblock someone. It basically forces them to unfollow you. They’ll still be able to access your feed if you’re not private, and if you’re private, they’ll have to request to follow you again (an option that isn’t available to them if you block them). I’ve found soft blocking to be useful in temporary situations, much like muting. If you just need temporary space from an ex, you can soft block them so they’re no longer following you and you’re no longer following them and then choose to change that later on down the road. If you soft block and they don’t take the hint, attempting repeatedly to re-follow you, you can go back to considering a block.


As with most breakup advice, you’re going to have to pick and choose what will work for your situation, and you might have to trial and error what feels best. None of these options have to be permanent — not even blocking, even though people find it to be extreme! Just try to find social media breakup practices that are not only healthy for you but healthy for your ex. Kill the urge to snoop, and/or kill their attempts to snoop, especially in the beginning stages of a breakup when snooping tends to do more harm than good for everyone involved.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Kayla Kumari Upadhyaya

Kayla Kumari Upadhyaya is the managing editor of Autostraddle and a lesbian writer of essays, short stories, and pop culture criticism living in Orlando. She is the assistant managing editor of TriQuarterly, and her short stories appear or are forthcoming in McSweeney's Quarterly Concern, Joyland, Catapult, The Offing, and more. Some of her pop culture writing can be found at The A.V. Club, Vulture, The Cut, and others. You can follow her on Twitter or Instagram and learn more about her work on her website.

Kayla has written 821 articles for us.

How To Improve a Queer Sex Marathon

One description of sex forever etched into my mind came from a bisexual friend. She described one of her exes as follows: ‘she and I would spend sunrise to sunset moving the bed from one end of the apartment to the other.

That was my first exposure to marathon sapphic sex. We can do it for hours. Like, hours. We’re foreplay oriented and know that orgasms don’t conclude the ceremonies. We’re not averse to assistance. Women are hot. I could keep going, but that’s another article. Even so, have we given thought to making marathon sex more comfortable? I love a spontaneous romp, but a few basic preparations can go a long way.

The Body Package

I’ll lay my bias out openly: I’m a germaphobe and hygiene comes first (I cum third, everyone else goes second). Like many people, we have a rotation of sex towels on hand. You know. Save a sheet; ruin a towel. Just toss it into the wash when we’re done. Easy.

But further than that, how about a package of essentials nestled in a bag under the bed? A package with wet wipes, lip balm, and a soft face towel for stray sweat. I like it to be slide-under-the-bed sized so I don’t have to explain a towel and wet wipes sitting in the open, but still within reach when the moment hits. You’ll get mega bonus points for a travel bottle of lube and mini vibrator that can be grabbed without fumbling through a drawer.

Okay, one special suggestion before I veer into another sex bag article: A pair of fresh underwear for each of you that lives inside said bag. Folded. Even if that’s the only pair in the house you fold. Marathon sex means taking breaks, but some of us feel odd walking around naked even with sex on the table. That’s what the fresh undies are for. There’s wordless joy in starting a sex break with clean hands, clean face, and fresh underwear. Plus, you get to begin the next session by peeling the underwear off your partner(s) again.

Middlecare

We kinksters are familiar with aftercare. During marathon sessions, you might even need middlecare. That’s not just caring for the middle partner in a triad (even though I think middles deserve all the love). It’s about finding moments of calm to reflect and maintain the mood.

There are other differences too. I think aftercare should be separated from sex. Or at least the very intense parts. Aftercare is used to restore our emotional balance after intense experiences. Some people put their power dynamics on hold or switch to a caregiving state. Aftercare concludes sex.

Middlecare is a chance to care for each other while sex is still on the table. That could mean switching to a massage-and-chat moment. It could be making out and laughing about the day’s events. Check your phones and switch up the playlist. Shower together.

Marathon sex is about riding the peaks and troughs of sensation. We can’t experience one without the other, and middlecare bridges that space. Just like aftercare, it can fit our needs. It can become aftercare if that’s where the vibe is going. Some people touch and tease during middlecare — just without leg-shaking intensity. Others need a full-on break for snacks and showers.

It’s exactly what you need it to be. I’m just putting the option out there.

Maximizing Comfort

Sex should always be comfortable. Just as long sex sessions raise the bar on intensity, they should also raise the bar on relaxation. Our bed has a mountain of pillows with textures and sizes to suit every need. We flop into them. We rest our heads on them. We use them during tricky positions. Our bodies aren’t flat, so why should our surfaces be? Get a continental pillow or two. Submerge yourself.

Hydration and stretching are also obligatory. Sex is physical, no matter how laid-back about it we are. One glass of water is enough for some, but my girlfriend needs half a gallon on standby or she’ll turn into a prune. So she tells me. I prefer stretching, though. I like being stretched into interesting positions, but I also do it on my own. Leave me alone for a bit, and you will witness the famous big kitty stretch. It’s a factory reset for my whole spine.

Lastly, I can’t leave food-motivated folks out without a paddle. Sex is hungry work. If not something from your last meal prep, then a snack bar and some breath mints will do fine. They’ll even fit into that package I mentioned at the beginning. I’m also the number one fan of plushies for comfort at home and abroad.

The only time comfort has backfired is when we get so comfy that we all fall asleep. I embrace it when it happens. Imagine making your marathon sex so chill you can’t fight off the sleepiness. Bliss.


Do you have any favorite tips for marathon sex? Put them in the comments!

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Summer Tao

Summer Tao is a South Africa based writer. She has a fondness for queer relationships, sexuality and news. Her love for plush cats, and video games is only exceeded by the joy of being her bright, transgender self

Summer has written 26 articles for us.

1 Comment

  1. I have always said the most important part of lesbian sex is getting her a glass of water while she regains the power of coherent speech, which is very stone top of me. 😂 Aftercare is so important even if kink isn’t in the equation! (I also love the term middlecare omg.)

  2. Inspiring! I just want to remind you all that it is important to be ergonomic and change hands and have breaks for arm recovery. I injured my one hand/arm three years ago due to “taking care” of my partner during a marathon, and it is still not recovered and requires regular physiotherapy to function at all. :(

Comments are closed.

‘But I’m a Cheerleader’ Made Internalized Homophobia Fun

In “Lost Movie Reviews From the Autostraddle Archives” we revisit past lesbian, bisexual, and queer classics that we hadn’t reviewed before, but you shouldn’t miss. This week is Jamie Babbit’s But I’m a Cheerleader.


I wrote just about everything down in my journal, back then, so of course I wrote about August 1, 2000, the night I saw But I’m a Cheerleader in a packed movie theater in downtown Ann Arbor. I described the film in all-caps as FUN. However, that assessment came at the end of an entry that wasn’t about the film at all, but about the conversation I’d had with my friend Kelly prior, in which I’d learned that Kelly had dated a girl during her first year of college. I wrote in my diary that Kelly’s admission does not really surprise me at all, which I imagine I felt because Kelly had always been such a hippie, you know? Even in middle school, which is where we knew each other from. She was the first of several friends throughout my life with whom I’d bonded over the Indigo Girls, who we’d both adored even as 12-year-olds. She cared a lot about the environment and cats and she wore a lot of necklaces and she was really empathetic and sentimental in a way that I somehow already knew to be a lesbian trait. So I wasn’t surprised that she’d dated a girl but I was, maybe, a little surprised by her nonchalance.

The conversation with Kelly went on from there into more unexpected places — including me telling Kelly about a girl I’d hooked up with at boarding school, which was something I hadn’t told very many people. I’ll get back to that in a minute, but I mention it now because it was a formative conversation for me, although it’s one I imagine Kelly has long since forgotten, and it led to But I’m a Cheerleader occupying a very specific place in my heart. I was host to so much internalized homophobia back then, a situation it’d take me many more years to identify and recognize, and internalized homophobia, in many ways, is the topic of But I’m a Cheerleader. Yet the film manages to take these dark feelings of shame and confusion, of family rejection and religious persecution and betrayal, and make it funny and cool and even a little romantic.

I’m not sure why I decided to see But I’m a Cheerleader with Kelly from middle school, except that I basically saw every independent film about girls that came out back then. It was a fantastic time to be a then-aspiring filmmaker, because female-fronted cinema, and independent film specifically, was truly blowing up in the ’90s. (I kept up on what was coming out through the Sunday New York Times and Entertainment Weekly.) I was likely drawn to But I’m a Cheerleader because it starred Natasha Lyonne (who I’d loved in Slums of Beverly Hills) and Clea Duvall (who I’d loved in The Faculty and Girl Interrupted) and Melanie Lynskey from Heavenly Creatures and Michelle Williams from Dawsons Creek and RuPaul, who I’d never seen out of drag before.

I remember being surprised that Kelly was eager to see it, too, and maybe asking her if she wanted to go was an invitation not just to the movie but to what we talked about beforehand.


But I’m a Cheerleader tells the story of Megan (Lyonne), a cheerleader at a suburban high school whose friends and family suspect she’s gay and thus ship her off to conversion therapy. At True Directions, patients are asked to reorient themselves away from homosexuality towards the light through aversion therapy, identifying the roots of their sexual deviance, and participating in exercises that emphasize traditional gender roles. Girls wear pink, boys wear blue, and the facility itself is decked out in that precise color scheme with a vivid, punchy visual language director Jamie Babbit says was inspired by by Barbie, David LaChapelle and John Waters.

Megan, who’d previously had no clue she was the only girl who hated kissing her boyfriend and the only cheerleader who thought so much about the breasts and asses of her teammates, finds herself eventually romantically drawn to surly cynic Graham (Clea Duvall), who’s wealthy parents are zealously attempting to stick their square peg of a daughter into a round hole.

Like conversion therapy in real life, True Directions is obviously unable to actually “cure” anybody of homosexuality, because of course conversion therapy is a fundamentally flawed, scientifically inaccurate and inhumane practice. But it’s also a fail because, as But I’m a Cheerleader reveals subversively, conversion therapy itself is super gay and extremely horny. The activities designed by True Directions leaders Mike (RuPaul) and Mary (Cathy Morarity) fail to mask Mary and Mike’s own obsessions with gay sex, or quiet the urges of their students. They discuss the evils of homosexuality with a kind of wistfulness. Gender itself, and particularly our most stereotypical expressions of it, is undeniably queer, and so utterly campy.

One of the film’s most powerful moments is when Jan, an athletic butch with an alternative lifestyle haircut, stands up in group therapy and declares that although everybody thinks she’s a big dyke because she “wears baggy pants and plays softball,” in fact she actually loves men. It’s a brief scene that nods to the conservative conflation of gender presentation with sexual orientation, a sentiment also backed up by the film’s title and Megan’s character. Sexual orientation is below the surface, in a part of ourselves that we’re either born with or we choose, but it can’t be altered by wearing pink outfits, playing with plastic babies, or having fake heterosexual sex with each other in full-body nude suits.

Megan approaches the work from a different angle than her peers — while they’ve been aware of their homosexuality and tried to fight it before, she comes newly diagnosed, and therefore far more hopeful about a potential fix. Like my friend Kelly, who simply met a girl, liked her, and went for it, Megan never had time to develop internalized homophobia. She tries to fix her homosexuality but finds more fulfillment in her relationship with Graham than she does in continuing to appease her parents through repression. Why fight what feels good? Ultimately, But I’m a Cheerleader gamely delivered a happy ending, something that was rare in lesbian cinema.


But back to that pre-film conversation. Kelly told me that another middle school friend, Chelsea, was presently in a lesbian relationship, which I qualified in my diary as a bit shocking. I just couldn’t imagine Chelsea participating in any sort of alternative lifestyle. Chelsea and I reconnected that year when I started at the University of Michigan (having spent my first post-high-school year in New York). We met every week for a dinner ritual that kept me grounded through that strange year, and although she never came out to me, but eventually I’d move in with her and her rugby friends and it would all become very obvious. I’d sit on the grass at the Indigo Girls concert watching Chelsea and her friends drink and dance and eat and smoke and wish I could be that free in myself, too. And then I’d go home and call my boyfriend who didn’t read books.

Kelly was so non-judgmental and open always, including in that conversation, and I was surprised to find myself wanting to tell her about my high school hookup with my best friend, and for maybe the first time, I talked about it as a thing that might mean something about me instead of a thing that absolutely didn’t. Kelly mentioned my mom, asking me why I hadn’t told anybody about her coming out as a lesbian when I was 15. I don’t remember how I answered, only what I wrote in my journal: I used to be scared when I was a kid that I would grow up to be a lesbian. I do think I’m bi — because I was attracted to Astrid for real, I think. Kelly thought it was funny that I didn’t tell anyone about my Mom. I think one of my biggest fears was people thinking I would be a lesbian too. Now I’m secure enough in myself that it doesn’t matter.

And then we watched this movie, and I think it’s a pretty early entry in what would eventually become a more storied tradition of lesbian camp, and it’s definitely the first lesbian comedy I’d seen. Previously, the LGBTQ+ movies I’d watched had been dramas, often dark and tragic dramas — Philadelphia, Boys Don’t Cry, I Shot Andy Warhol, Gods and Monsters, My Own Private Idaho, Heavenly Creatures, Velvet Goldmine, Gia, The Talented Mr Ripley, Six Degrees of Separation. Gay comedies were rare, and those that evoked something like queer joy usually centered on gay men, drag queens or both, like The Birdcage and The Object of My Affection and Too Wong Foo, Thank You For Everything Julie Newmar.

This movie, though? This movie was different. This movie had a female lead and it was funny, and smart, and had cool actors and music I loved and at the end we didn’t cry ’cause someone died, we cried because love is love and love won.

Of course Kelly thought it was “funny” I hadn’t told anybody about my mom, because it is funny. Internalized homophobia is ridiculous and the ways we deal with it are funny, as this movie makes very clear. Maybe that’s why after writing, in my journal, I could see *maybe* being with a girl… but not forever. It might just be part of my general desire to do things that are risky and weird. I also wrote, We’ll see. I know that “we’ll see” was hard for me to even consider, then, but I know it was a big step.

And then, finally, the entry ended with my review, which I stand by to this day: Good movie though — FUN. 


But I’m a Cheerleader is available for free on Tubi.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Riese

Riese is the 41-year-old Co-Founder of Autostraddle.com as well as an award-winning writer, video-maker, LGBTQ+ Marketing consultant and aspiring cyber-performance artist who grew up in Michigan, lost her mind in New York and now lives in Los Angeles. Her work has appeared in nine books, magazines including Marie Claire and Curve, and all over the web including Nylon, Queerty, Nerve, Bitch, Emily Books and Jezebel. She had a very popular personal blog once upon a time, and then she recapped The L Word, and then she had the idea to make this place, and now here we all are! In 2016, she was nominated for a GLAAD Award for Outstanding Digital Journalism. She's Jewish and has a cute dog named Carol. Follow her on twitter and instagram.

Riese has written 3189 articles for us.

1 Comment

  1. Thanks for writing this. It reminded me of how I felt when I first saw But I’m A Cheerleader. I’ll never stop loving this movie! And your beautiful penultimate paragraph reminded me of my own “we’ll see” moment — mine unrelated to the film, but still. Ooft.

    OK, going to go rewatch But I’m A Cheerleader Now.

Comments are closed.

How Do We Navigate Ethical Concerns About Having Kids as a Queer Couple?

Q:

So my partner and I are planning on getting married and starting a family soon — but I’m feeling super overwhelmed by the prospect of figuring out the ethics of having a child as a gay couple. I’ve been reading a lot from the adoptive community about the trauma of adoption and how it’s often unethical, but I’m hearing similar things from donor conceived people. I feel like I rarely see these concerns in queer family spaces, but any time a question is raised about gay parents in adoption and donor conception spaces, it is (understandably) not centered. How do I go about navigating this ethical minefield? Is it just not possible for my family to have kids in a way that wouldn’t profit from their trauma? I don’t want to disregard the voices of those communities — but I also have always wanted to be a parent. Help!

A:

I think it’s really admirable that you’re thinking about the ethics of having a kid. A lot of people don’t, and there is value in doing this kind of consideration before having kids. But I think there’s a difference between being aware and letting it keep you from doing something you have always wanted to do. If you want to have a kid, then you should do that and go in the direction that feels best to you and works with the resources you have at your disposal.

Admittedly, I conceived my son while I was in a relationship with a man, but my wife and I did talk at length about having a child together.

Adoption is a difficult avenue to navigate ethics-wise. It’s good that reunification where possible is becoming more normalized, because families do deserve a chance to make it work when they want to. But there are still so many kids in the system who need loving parents, and it’s admirable that people want to step up to the plate. I think there are a lot of things people who want to adopt need to think about heading into the process. It’s not solely about giving kids who don’t have a home a home. You need to be 100% sure you will be able to handle whatever gets thrown at you, and you need to consider all the complex questions all parents-to-be must undertake. If you have a child with complex medical issues or a child who is neurodivergent, are you going to do the work to make sure you fully understand their needs and will you do everything possible to make sure that they’re being given the best care you can manage? Ultimately though, these are questions any new parents should ask themselves, regardless of how they’re starting a family. With adoption, you’ll also need to consider if you’re prepared and able to navigate parenting a child who has experienced trauma and other hardships prior to their life with you.

There has been more of a conversation started by transracial adoptees about the challenges of transracial adoption in recent years that has been incredibly important. If you do go the route of transracial adoption, do you really understand what that means and looks like? As a parent, are you willing to do the homework about your child’s culture and heritage? I’ve read stories, but also heard from people I know who are transracial adoptees that so many adoptive parents don’t even try to do that. If you were to adopt a child of a different race, how would you educate yourself, but more importantly, how would you make sure you’re keeping them connected to that heritage? That is one of your biggest jobs as an adoptive parent. And if you’re not prepared for that, then that’s not the route you should go down. There are so many memoirs written by adoptees, and I encourage you to read them to get a better sense of some of these experiences from their end.

Now, things are complex for their own reasons when we’re talking about donor conception. If you want to have a biological child, this really is the only way to make that happen. I also did some research to see what the conversations around donor conception and ethics are, and much of it seems to be anecdotal. Some people may feel like it’s shady or unethical, but by and large, it’s an accepted way of conception, especially for same sex couples who can’t conceive any other way. One of the things I kept running into is how and when to tell your child they are donor conceived. If you’re worried about ethics, not disclosing this information, or waiting until your child is an adult is definitely going to lead to a lot more challenges than letting your child know earlier.

There are conversations happening about the ethics of sperm donation, mainly that there needs to be a limit on how many families can use one person’s sperm. Some sperm donors want to be found and some don’t, which can pose issues if a kid has questions later on, but that information should be given to the sperm bank, and you can choose a donor based on those stipulations. Different sperm banks have rules around what kind of information gets shared — if you want your child to be able to know their donor siblings, that is something you can include in your criteria.

An article shared by international sperm bank Cryos referenced work done by Susan Golombok, a Professor of Family Research and the Director of the Centre for Family Research at the University of Cambridge, on this topic. Her studies on the subject “show that donor children are well adjusted and that they are no different from children in other families.” In fact, “donor-conceived children who are told about the donor early on, do not seem to be distressed – they are either not very interested in their origins or are curious to know more.” If anything, she’s found “the make-up of their family does not affect the wellbeing of these children, but intolerance of their family does.”

Only you can decide if you’re going to have a child. Some would argue that having a child at all isn’t ethical, but making the decision to become a parent isn’t that cut and dry. When I had my son, I was unemployed. We had to live with my parents for a few years until I was able to get on my feet enough to move. I have been a low income parent for most of the past 10 years. People would argue that it was unethical for me to have my son if I couldn’t afford to properly care for him. But if you ask him, I don’t think he’d agree.

You say you’ve always wanted to be a parent. What would your life feel like if you chose not to be one? When you have these issues around the ethical way to have a child, whose opinion are you worried about? If it’s other people, who cares? They’re not the ones who are going through the process, you are. When you say “profit from their trauma,” what do you mean? We can’t anticipate how our kids are going to feel about their life. We can only do the best we can. You shouldn’t not have a kid because you’re worried that when they’re older they’re going to think their conception was unethical. If it comes up, you can work through it then. But if you’ve always seen yourself as a parent, then you should be one.

You’ve done the research and found people who are donor conceived and find it unethical, but have you looked at all the stories of people who are grateful their moms went through the process to make them? Everything about having a child will have upsides and downsides. However, if you feel a strong pull to have a child and take the route of having one biologically, then you should do it. Because chances are, if you’re open and honest with your kid from the beginning, how they came to be may not matter as much as how much you love them.


You can chime in with your advice in the comments and submit your own questions any time.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Sa'iyda Shabazz

Sa'iyda is a writer and mom who lives in LA with her partner, son and 3 adorable, albeit very extra animals. She has yet to meet a chocolate chip cookie she doesn't like, spends her free time (lol) reading as many queer romances as she can, and has spent the better part of her life obsessed with late 90s pop culture.

Sa'iyda has written 119 articles for us.

21 Comments

  1. I have so much respect for the LW for starting this conversation. It’s thorny, and often queer people who want to be parents feel fragile about their desires (understandably) or demand validation for them and shut down any conversations about the complications. It seems much healthier to talk about the different feelings people have without judging them.

    People in my queer communities, especially QPOC, often question those who use resources to conceive children instead of sharing what they have with children who already exist, especially kids of color. I know the difficulties of transracial adoption are very real, but this idea also has a lot of proponents, and I thought that the LW was alluding to it in the letter.

    I would also add, as someone who also knows and loves a lot of queerspawn, I would also counsel anyone thinking of using a donor to prepare really early on for your kids wanting to meet/know/have a relationship with a donor. For most of the kids I know, this was important, and there were often very difficult dynamics when the parents didn’t want it to happen, were ostensibly supportive but let their hurt feelings show too much, or otherwise made the kids feel they had to hide those desires (often by being in queer community spaces that promoted the idea that healthy kids or kids with supportive families don’t want to do this).

    Sending the courageous, thoughtful, and loving LW the best making the decisions that are right for them and their family!

    • It seems pretty clear the substance of this person’s ethical concerns is pain they may cause their future child. The idea that the solution is to refocus on their own desire to be a parent, reframe their concerns as “worrying about other people’s opinions”, and seek out information that would make them feel better about their choice to conceive via donor seems to be deflecting the seriousness of their concerns a bit… Knowing that many children do want a relationship with their donor, it’s highly relevant whether that person is a faceless stranger with potentially dozens of other children or someone with whom a relationship would be possible.

      • Yes, definitely a/the main concern of mine is the impact on future potential children! I know already I would absolutely only be open to a more open donor situation (not completely anonymous/closed) for this exact reason.

    • LW here! Thank you so much for the well wishes and for your perspective—I’m seeing even in these comments this same dichotomy of either heavily centering parent desires or heavily centering ideal ethics and not enough useful in between! It’s really nice to try and actually hold these conversations, though, especially before actually getting into the process of becoming a parent.

  2. I’ll weigh in as an adoptive parent who takes the problems with adoption very seriously. I was pretty naive when I started thinking about adoption, and my partner and I did a lot of research to educate ourselves. I was open to adopting an older child—and dealing with all the trauma that comes with that—but my partner had their heart set on raising a baby, so we went the infant adoption route… which led to a whole new set of concerns around how entangled infant adoption is with the antiabortion movement. All that to say, it’s pretty fucked up out there, whether due to the state separating families of color or kids coming from forced pregnancies. BUT there are still kids who need homes for one reason or another, and providing a home that not only acknowledges but creates space for centering the stories behind adoption—especially the hard ones—makes a big difference.

    From what I’ve read, so many adoptee stories that reflect badly on the practice reveal very troubling understandings of family/children as property. Even adoptive families that claim to practice “open adoption” can end up minimizing the pain of losing one’s first family. If adoption is on the table, adjusting how you both understand and talk about family can make a big difference, from little things like using “first family” instead of “birth family,” to big things like building and maintaining connection to extended connections in the first family beyond parents. The way we think of it is that we didn’t just adopt this individual child, we adopted a whole new extended family that came with her. And just like all families, these relationships involve careful negotiation of boundaries on all sides, respect, and love.

    And though my partner and our child share their Blackness, as a white parent I also echo and reiterate the points made above about transracial adoption. It takes a lot of learning and action, and may mean challenging some of the things you take for granted about parenting. But it is both doable and worth it.

    • Hi commenters, I’m the original letter writer! Just wondering if anyone has any other suggestions for resources to consider this further?
      I really appreciate all the perspectives I’ve seen in the response and comments! One of the reasons I have been especially hung up on the ethics of adoption as opposed to donor conception is because for health reasons it is unlikely I will be able to actually carry a child, and my partner is not interested or comfortable in doing so. I also, though I’m not sure if this is valid or not, feel weird about the idea of having a stranger’s genetics in my own body? Anyway, thank you all for wonderful feedback, and I’m glad to have started this conversation!

      Also, if anyone is an AP, adoptee, or DCC/P and would feel comfortable talking to me about their experience, I would greatly appreciate it.

      • Oops, not sure why this showed up as a reply to a comment. Sorry about that!

  3. I was adopted and while I am grateful for the family I have, there is still inherent trauma to being rejected by a biological family. My partner and I would not consider adoption.

    We are having these same concerns and conversation about sperm donors and I wanted to share two resources. One is https://www.usdcc.org/ the US Donor Conceived Council, which is run by donor conceived people and has leadership with mental health training. The other is The Seed Scout, which is a company founded by queer women to match donors with families. They address most of my major concerns by allowing both the donor and the recipient to consent to the match, facilitating virtual introductions, entering into binding agreements to donate to three families or fewer, and requiring annual contact to update medical records and keep the kinship connection. They are here: https://www.theseedscout.com/

    Thanks for asking a question we have been grappling hard with in a public space and thanks to Autostraddle for publishing it/starting a convo!

  4. If anyone has recommendations on children’s books to have those conversations early (re: user a donor) it would be much appreciated! The social worker we had to talk to had written a lovely book, but it was still yet to be published / exists only as a word doc

  5. I have always wanted to be a parent. I was interested in being a foster parent but my ex-wife was less comfortable with the idea, so we tried the route of IVf using her gametes before transition and my gametes. It didn’t work. After many discussions we decided to go through the foster parenting classes with the goal of supporting lgbt+ youth in the system. Parenting was not a good fit for her. She wanted to be a parent as a noun but not to do parenting as a verb.

    As a foster/adopt parent for quite a few years, I love that I have been able to do parenting, so much parenting, and to support bio parents! Yes the foster care system is problematic and we as a society should be doing so much more to support bio/first families! Also, not everyone should be a foster/adopt parent. Like Professor Queermo said, you have to be open to connections with the bio/first families. I love all of the bonus people in my life and in my children’s lives! I love knowing that I’ve been able to support bio parents when they needed help by caring for their children, giving the children tools for navigating life, and cheering the parents when they are able to parent their children again.

    • You seem thoughtful in how you speak about the system and society as a whole not doing enough for bio/first families and how you try to have an open, supportive connection with them that makes reunification more likely.

      Are there any resources or writing you would recommend to a person trying to figure out if they could be a good (as in acting in the best interests of a child) foster parent in the future?

      Both in terms of the ethics of it all and practicality (like space, what financial/education/mental healthcare resources a kid would need, etc.)

      I’m about to graduate college and the decision of whether to parent or not seems far way.

      Until recently I assumed I wouldn’t be a parent. I haven’t felt a deep, lifelong desire for it, I’m not particularly interested in having a baby (don’t have siblings or really spend time around children right now), I’m definitely not interested in carrying a pregnancy, I enjoy the opportunity for solitude, spontaneity and the energy/time I have for other things at the moment (was looking at childless artists and activists for ideas in how I wanted to live my life), I don’t currently have a partner or a potential parenting support system and I live in an expensive city (though with good public transportation) where it’d be hard to find a two-bedroom place.

      But reading about that chilling law in Tennessee that enshrines the ability of homophobic/transphobic people to foster LGBTQ kids led me to do more reading about what being and caring for a LGBTQ teen in the system can or has historically looked like.

      I would need a lot more time to figure out if being a foster parent is something I could/should do, but I do think I would be better at caring for a teenager—with their own desires, needs, relationships and likely traumas—than an infant.

      Do you have any advice for someone trying to figure out if their feelings are just a sign that they want to be, “a parent as a noun” vs. wanting to, “do parenting as a verb”?

      And what are other ways to support LGBTQ young people, both in the system and outside it?

  6. This reader’s question really resonated with me as my wife and I are in the early days of trying to have a baby. Most other queer parents in our circle have been using known donors specifically because they want their child to have a connection to that part of their identity (and also usually much more affordable). It’s also valuable to have communication with a known donor in case of medical emergencies. But for us, there just isn’t anyone in our life that we feel comfortable asking to donate, so a sperm bank is going to be the route we take. To help us make more informed choices, we turned to our community. We’re working with a queer, trans midwife with lots of experience navigating the cryobank system. I’m privileged to have a friend who is donor conceived and willing to share their feelings about it and their perspective has been invaluable. That said, we have narrowed down our search to cryobank donors that are listed as being open to contact either at any time or after our child turns 18. I also highly recommend checking out a copy of Queer Conception by Kristin L. Kali.
    Any time you make big decisions like this, it can be easy to get hung up on trying to make a perfect choice, when really you just need to find the one that works best for your family.

  7. I highly recommend The Sperm Bank of California for anyone looking for donor sperm. They were created in the 80’s by and for queer women, limit donors to 10 families (our donor only helped 4 other families), and have excellent research available on supporting your donor conceived kids. You have the option of connecting with families that use the same donor and your children can have the option to connect with their donor when they turn 18.

  8. You’re not going to be able to eliminate friction from your child’s life – whether you conceive naturally, use a donor, or adopt. In light of this, it’s important that your intentions are clear, you keep the lines of communication open, and you prepare for the potential friction that may come (as best you can).

  9. I think this is a super important set of questions that received a terrible, misinformed response. To the original asker, I would say: adoption is not ethical, in any scenario. If you’re interested in supporting children that have no other options, look into legal guardianship as a slightly better option. Having children via a donor is usually just another form of adoption. Any approach that involves severing ties with a child’s biological parents is traumatic to that child and impacts them for life, even if it’s done at birth. The only option I would say is ethical is using a donor that also wants to be a parent and all of you be involved in the raising of that child. I suggest checking out adoptee twitter and donor conceived twitter to understand the real impact that the adoption industry has on children and families.

    • What makes you the authority on what types of families should exist and how they should be made? You seem to think that a genetic relationship automatically makes someone a healthy and necessary presence in a child’s life. Many people who don’t have relationships with one or both parents as adults could tell you otherwise, but it doesn’t seem like you’ve bothered to learn about experiences outside of your personal bubble.
      Calling conceiving a child through sperm donation the same as adoption is also just extremely inaccurate and entirely unreasonable.
      Your argument can be honestly summarized as “children need a mother and a father,” and I’m very hurt and disappointed to see that on a sapphic website.

  10. Really really happy to see this conversation here, because with a DCC I think about it every day and wish that my wife and I had had more resources when we were starting the whole process.

    I suggest looking at COLAGE National which is a community of queerspawn for queerspawn, and they have several guides for kids/parents/prospective parents etc, so it’s a good place to start.

  11. Hi commenters, I’m the original letter writer! Just wondering if anyone has any other suggestions for resources to consider this further?
    I really appreciate all the perspectives I’ve seen in the response and comments! One of the reasons I have been especially hung up on the ethics of adoption as opposed to donor conception is because for health reasons it is unlikely I will be able to actually carry a child, and my partner is not interested or comfortable in doing so. I also, though I’m not sure if this is valid or not, feel weird about the idea of having a stranger’s genetics in my own body? Anyway, thank you all for wonderful feedback, and I’m glad to have started this conversation!

    Also, if anyone is an AP, adoptee, or DCC/P and would feel comfortable talking to me about their experience, I would greatly appreciate it.

  12. As a fellow overthinker and over-researcher, who appreciates all the great concrete tips shared on this thread, I am also here to lovingly suggest you cannot homework your way through this decision. The thing that unlocked the parenting decision for me and my partner was realising we were writing a story of how our baby came to be, that one day we could tell our child, and at a gut level the story had to feel right, and sound right, and be something we were excited to tell them. The research we had done helped a bit (another punt for Susan Golombok’s work), but it wasn’t determinative, and I’m afraid to say as for most things in life, probably served to some degree as post-hoc rationalisation haha.

    Also as someone who has a little bit of experience working in child and adolescent mental health, I am often struck by how rich and complex children’s lives are, and though there are some simple conditions that make things better, beyond that is a sea of contingencies and things over which you have no hope of control. Above all, you cannot effectively parent from a place of fear. Yes, one day your child may have difficult feelings about their origins (as do many, many, many children of straight relationships). If you are thinking about your future child’s wellbeing, you are thinking about how to share openly with them how you came to be their parent, and you are aware of the difficult feelings and experiences they may have as a result of it, then you are setting your family up to navigate the uncertainties to come. Also, you absolutely have to take your capacity, resources, and desires into account! This is not to say you shouldn’t be guided by what is best for your future child, and sometimes push yourself into personal discomfort if you think it is worthwhile, but there is no reason to frame your wellbeing coming at the expense of their’s or vice versa.

    Anyway, I hope you can find moments of joy or excitement as you make your way through this process! It can be a tough grind to have to be so deliberate in all your actions, even if it is ultimately really meaningful, and those lighter moments of anticipation really keep you going. All the best.

Comments are closed.

A Hilarious Sapphic Road Trip Romance About Death and English Teachers

Alison Cochrun’s latest romance novel, Here We Go Again, opens with an ending. Well, a few endings. It’s the last day of classes for both Logan Maletis and Rosemary Hale, fellow English teachers (and childhood best friends turned sworn nemeses) at Vista Summit High School. Logan is fresh off of pulling the Death card from a student’s Tarot deck when she’s broken up with in an Applebees by a woman 1. whose name she doesn’t know and 2. who she didn’t realize she was dating. Rosemary is getting similarly bad news in this very same Applebees! The school is “temporarily letting her go” (laying her off!), citing budget cuts.

In the midst of all of this, Joe Delgado, their beloved former high school English teacher (yes, they are all English teachers!) and stand-in father figure, is losing his fight with pancreatic cancer. He has metastases and wants to spend his last days in his cottage in Maine. And he’s decided that, despite their long-standing enmity, both Logan and Rosemary will drive him cross-country to get there. And because they love him, they do exactly that. They set off in a van emblazoned with “The Queer Cuddler” on its side and with Joe’s almost-service dog, Odysseus, in tow. Rosemary has a plan and a binder, but both of these things are quickly abandoned and the journey is far better for it.

Cochrun is a veritable romance expert, and Here We Go Again is perhaps her best yet. She’s crafted a love story with so much yearning, so much heart and care, with sticky-sweet summer and childhood innocence strewn throughout the pages. She captures so perfectly the feeling of being in love with your childhood best friend before you have the language to explain it! And Cochrun does all of this with the specter of death looming throughout the pages. Every state line that the trio crosses brings them closer to another ending. In fact, this is just as much a novel about love as it is about death.

Despite the abounding death, I never thought Here We Go Again was heavy. It’s emotional, for sure, but Cochrun seamlessly weaves humor throughout the novel. From the way the characters exclaim “Eleanor fucking Roosevelt” to express their surprise, to the description of the mayor of Vista Summit (a former rodeo clown and flat earther whose platform was bringing Chick-Fil-A to the town). Or my personal favorite, the way that Logan and Rosemary react to finding an analog nude (read: painting) of Joe Delgado in Santa Fe. I found myself chuckling throughout the novel.

With Here We Go Again, we get to witness the road trip of a lifetime. Joe sets his terms for his departure, making sure he takes it all in (and gets some action) one last time. And Logan and Rosemary hero-journey their way through the contiguous United States, finding church drag shows and gas station shrimp and magical sunsets and somewhere along the way, the long-untouched love they once shared as tweens. And Odysseus… well, he’s there for it all.


Here We Go Again by Alison Cochrun is out now.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

ashni

Ashni is a writer, comedian, and farmer's market enthusiast. When they're not writing, they can be found soaking up the sun, trying to make a container garden happen, or reading queer YA.

ashni has written 48 articles for us.

Trailer Drop: Gay Teen Comedy ‘Prom Dates’ Is the Child of ‘Booksmart’ and ‘Blockers’

Gay Teen Comedy “Prom Dates” Comes Out Friday (Pun Intended) on Hulu

In a room full of rainbow lights, Hannah looks stunned as a girl puts her hands on her shoulders

I also lost my mind the first time I met college lesbians.

Joining the ranks of goofy, silly queer comedies comes Hulu original Prom Dates, a movie starring queer actor Julia Lester from High School Musical: The Musical: The Series and Ginny & Georgia’s Antonia Gentry.

In the movie, best friends Hannah (Lester) and Jess (Gentry) plot to have the perfect prom night, despite the fact that they find themselves unexpectedly single as the date approaches. Jess because her boyfriend cheated on her, and Hannah because she realizes she’s gay and has to dump her boyfriend about it. The trailer is a lot of fun! It seems like Prom Dates has similar vibes to its predecessors Booksmart and Blockers; teens trying to make the most of their senior year, and one of said friends is gay. Like in both of those movies, it seems like the gay character is at the beginning of their baby gay journey, and not unlike another queer teen comedy, Bottoms, it seems Hannah will be stumbling through part of this journey, making many an embarrassing blunder. Some of which will be done in an attempt to woo Angie, played by queer, nonbinary actor Terry Hu, who has played queer as recently as The Girls on the Bus.

I, for one, am so here for the queer teen comedy. I was a 90s kid, so I was raised on teen comedies like She’s All That, Clueless, Can’t Hardly Wait, and American Pie. And while there were queer characters in some of the teen comedies of my youth, often a queer teen comedy would be ABOUT queerness, like But I’m a Cheerleader. A classic, but not exactly a universally relatable experience.

What I love about the more recent wave of inclusion in teen comedies — see also The Half of It and one of my favorites, Crush — is that it’s fully integrated into a regular teen story. This isn’t to say any of the characters “just happen to be gay” (that usually feels like a cop-out), because characters in these movies do have to actually reckon with their queerness, and how it differentiates their experience from that of their straight counterpart, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be just as funny and messy and wacky as anyone else. It’s not an easy balance to strike, and I have high hopes that Prom Dates will do exactly that, especially since it’s written by nonbinary comedian D.J. Mausner.

Check out the trailer now!


More News to Pin to Your Lapel

+ Keke Palmer and SZA will be starring in an Issa Rae comedy together

+ Speaking of Keke “booked and busy” Palmer, it seems like Marvel has their eye on her, too

+ The Outlaws returns with its third season soon

+ My beloved NCIS: Hawaii was cancelled, another victim of the Cancel Your Gays trend; Kate and Lucy aren’t even in a ton of episodes together this season, but when they are, WHEW how they shine… I’ll miss them dearly

+ In better news, The Equalizer was renewed for a 5th season

+ In an upcoming gay film, Cora Bora, a traveling musician goes home to try to patch things up with her girlfriend, starring bisexual actress Meg Statler and also Heather Morris of Glee fame

+ Billie Eilish is taking her new album on tour this fall

+ Lily Gladstone is joining Greta Gerwig on the Cannes film festival jury

+ Even though it’s not dropping until the fall, MGM+ has already started teasing From‘s third season, which I personally cannot wait for

+ Last and also least, Ellen is whining about being “kicked out of show business” (read: dealing with the consequences of her own abusive actions) while actively on tour and prepping for a Netflix comedy special

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Valerie Anne

Just a TV-loving, Twitter-addicted nerd who loves reading, watching, and writing about stories. One part Kara Danvers, two parts Waverly Earp, a dash of Cosima and an extra helping of my own brand of weirdo.

Valerie has written 552 articles for us.

3 Comments

  1. I’m so sad about Hawaii, it was such awesome representation on CBS of all places, they’re creating a new NCIS show that happens in the late 80s, early 90s… I doubt we’re getting queer rep there.

    Chloë Grace Moretz is engaged to her girlfriend of 6 years!

    I really think we should lay off Ellen, she’s been punished enough.

    Where would the queer community be without her honestly, I doubt 66% of Americans would support gay marriage without her representation. She’s everything.

    • I saw Ellen do this material as a surprise opener for Tig Notaro earlier this year, and as much as I belonged to the crowd of people who supported her downfall, I was surprised to find that it really connected with me. I’m a younger millennial and had previously never really watched her in any capacity, so I didn’t think I’d find her stand-up anything special. I was so wrong. The way she spoke from the heart about the changes that have gone on in her life since her show was cancelled — I found that really evocative and funny, enough for me to want to give her some grace for her past mistakes. Characterizing it as whining without even seeing it in context strikes me as immature and a bit of a sheep mentality. I definitely encourage readers to see it for themselves rather than blindly running with Valerie Anne’s limited view.

      • I’m sorry you find it immature of me to not want to hear from someone who was accused of fostering an abusive and racist workplace. Her whole schtick on that show was pretending to be a nice, good person despite the fact that she was not acting that way to anyone in her actual life, it’s not surprising to me she’s continuing that act on stage now that the screen is not available to her anymore.

        I agree that she was important to queer history, and nothing will ever change that, but that doesn’t mean I want to support her now. JK Rowling was important to a lot of kids, but she turned out to be a monster. You can acknowledge someone’s past importance without supporting them.

        You can call me immature all you want, but I assure you I am no sheep.

        • Tt is right. And in the material she is vulnerable about how she never was trained in how to be a boss and she did a lot of things badly. Which is definitely a story I thought Autostraddle staff might connect with haha

Comments are closed.

Maggie Nelson’s New Book Urges Us To Revel In the Art We Love

Before you get into any of the work collected in Maggie Nelson’s newest book, Like Love, you’re confronted with a question that might be difficult to answer at first: “How can the attention one pays to art be an act of love, or something like it, if and when the love object (words, sounds, paint, pixels) cannot love you back?” In the lead up to this line of inquiry that sets up the occasion for everything contained in Like Love, Nelson discusses encountering art as a kid, mostly through her mother’s insistence, and taking her time to fully feel the emotions and meaning conveyed through the piece. She describes how often she couldn’t discuss art with her mother immediately after, that she needed to think about what she witnessed more than those moments allowed. This time we take to “pay attention” to the works we witness, Nelson insists, is imperative to fully understanding them and ourselves.

Like Love is a collection of examples that put Nelson’s attention on display for us. It’s a creative and intellectual road map guiding us through many of Nelson’s influences, curiosities, and obsessions to help us understand in an attempt to answer the question that she poses to us and herself at the start of the collection. Unlike her poetry collections and her memoir/nonfiction books, another side of Nelson is showcased here through her critical writings on various works of art in several different mediums, the artists who created them, the thinkers who challenge and delight her, and a short series of transcribed conversations between Nelson and other working writers, artists, and thinkers. The works collected here have been published elsewhere before — some in publications that are easily accessible to anyone and others in catalogs for artists’ shows or collections — which is one of the most interesting aspects of the text itself.

As with so much of what is addressed in the pieces collected in the text, this is Nelson’s retrospective of shorter works spanning the last 24 years. They aren’t situated chronologically or thematically, but you can see her evolution as a critic, thinker, and person in the world as you move through the different essays. Though this might be a little disorienting to some who have come to love Nelson’s work through Bluets and The Argonauts, her mode is still very much the same. These pieces are most often not simply focused on just the subject at hand. She, as she usually does, works as both the investigator and problem solver, weaving in works from other writers and thinkers that she knows will help illuminate our understanding of what she’s trying to prove to us. Olivia Laing once wrote of Nelson’s work, “The Nelsonian unit of thought is not the chapter but the paragraph, a mode that allows for deep swerves and juxtapositions, for the interspersing of anecdote and analysis.” Like Love follows this exact rhythm — except this time, these detours are less about Nelson probing her own experiences, memories, and vulnerabilities, and more about transforming her rapt attention for her subjects into language we can all comprehend and, perhaps, emulate in our own ways.

The best pieces in this collection achieve exactly that, despite her recognition that “Probably, language does not make art happy.” In a piece on Alice Notley’s feminist skewering on the epic poem, The Descent of Alette, Nelson discusses reaching for the book to prepare for writing about it and Notley in a way that she hadn’t already in her work on the women of the New York School of poetry. Though she’s spent a lot of time with Alette, it’s this rereading that teaches her something new about how the work — a story of a woman who must slay the “Tyrant” in order to liberate herself and everyone else — moves within her: “…The power of Alette — the change I felt within me while taking its ride and after — gave me pause. For I can’t think of another book that changed me — or that makes me feel that radical change is possible — the way Alette did and does.” This realization helps her admit, “The truth is that on many days I feel that the energy I project is really a version of what painter Francis Bacon called ‘exhilarated despair.’ This has its charms and drive, but it isn’t really enough.” The contemplation of the themes, mood, and attitude of Alette leads her on a path of appraisal of the way she has been showing up in the world and invites us to do the same.

A short and incisive essay on Prince’s Purple Rain takes us from Nelson and her sister’s original obsession with what they believed was the movie’s message of sexual empowerment to how the film played a pivotal role in her own sexual development, to how she was able to experience the pleasures of sex without the shame of it. She writes, “I hate the way this possibility of experience for boys and girls and everyone in between gets drowned out in moralistic crap about power and consent, all of which is necessary but too often eclipses the real divine electric dirtiness that is possible between excited young bodies who have accepted that they have desire and somehow manage to find each other. I want people, especially girls, to know that that’s possible. It’s possible even when you’re thirteen, fifteen, and it can be great.” Here, she provides not only an appraisal of her own experiences with this particular piece of art, but offers something to us as well: The works we consume don’t necessarily have to be perfect for us to grow because of them or make our own meanings from them.

Two tribute pieces to Hilton Als and Judith Butler take Nelson’s attempt to show love (more specifically, reverence) to the works that move her to another level. These pieces are not just focused on how their works have altered her thinking, but also how their ways of being and showing up in their work have changed the ways she approaches her own. You can feel her deep admiration for how each of them are able to provoke new recognitions and cognizance within her. Of Als, she writes, “Hilton’s sensibility is also marked by its deep and wild explorations of identification (or disidentification, as the queer theorists like to say) and its wily, torturous relationship to desire. […] Hilton’s persistent forays into these wilds chart another course altogether, one that shrugs off demands for political efficacy or mea culpas, and makes no a priori presumptions about where or how connections will be found.”

Thinking through one of Butler’s assertions in their book Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, Nelson writes how that very assertion — “Let’s face it. We’re undone by each other. And if we’re not, we’re missing something.” — has been haunting Nelson’s thoughts since she originally read in 2004. At the end of the piece, she addresses Butler directly: “It’s like — or I’m like — I took you up on your 2004 invitation to face it; now it’s 2022, and I’ve been facing it, yet everything remains a mess. I tried to figure out who you are, who I am, who we are to each others, who is responsible for what, where we begin and end, how to repair what can be repaired (and live with all that cannot), how not to punish each other or project onto each other (unduly), how to handle all the aggression and disappointment our interrelation arouses, how to mourn you. And I still haven’t figured it out! And now you’re retiring!” It might be tempting to think of these tributes as hero worship, but it quickly becomes apparent how superficial that description is when it comes to the way Nelson’s writing illustrates both her intellectual and emotional congruence with the subjects that have significantly altered not just her perceptions of art and human connectivity but also the possibilities that connectivity can afford to us.

What unites the collection is that you can see the string of this mode of thinking throughout every piece collected here. Nelson might still feel apprehensive about what we can do to show our love to works that can’t possibly love us back, but the way she moves through the pieces and people at the center of these essays shows there are radical possibilities in giving ourselves the time and space to truly reflect on the things we believe we love. We don’t have to change the world through our reflection; it’s possible we’ll be changed through that reflection and that can somehow, in some way, extend outward to everything else we hold dear in this life. Of course, Nelson doesn’t explicitly say this. Instead, she lays her cards out on the table and emboldens us to not only read them but also be moved to create the cards that move us and figure out our own ways to give those back to the world.


Like Love by Maggie Nelson is out now.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Stef Rubino

Stef Rubino is a writer, community organizer, and student of abolition from Ft. Lauderdale, FL. They teach Literature and writing to high schoolers and to people who are currently incarcerated, and they’re the fat half of the arts and culture podcast Fat Guy, Jacked Guy. You can find them on Twitter (unfortunately).

Stef has written 83 articles for us.

1 Comment

Comments are closed.

Nava Mau Is Playing Her Own Game — And Changing the World Along the Way

The first time I saw Nava Mau on-screen, she was introducing herself. The lines she said were her own, the gaze was her own. This short film Waking Hour — written, directed, produced, and starring Nava — presented a multi-talented artist with a clear perspective.

Every time, I’ve seen Nava on-screen since, it’s reaffirmed that perspective. Even when not performing her own words under her own direction, each project feels part of the same consistent mission. Whether playing a supportive aunt on the tragically short-lived teen dramedy Genera+ion or deepening what could’ve been a one-note trans love interest on the complex recent Netflix hit Baby Reindeer, Nava approaches her work with a purity of purpose.

I asked Nava about that purpose and the community work that inspired how she navigates the industry.


Drew: I feel like a lot of trans actors and artists are thrust into activist and advocacy work. But that’s where you started. Where’d you grow up and what led you to that political and community work?

Nava: I grew up in Mexico City and then when I was eight, I moved to San Antonio, Texas — both very family-oriented, community-oriented places. I credit my foundation for how I value community and how I value a mindset of interconnectedness as opposed to individualism. I think I’ve always met people on a heart level. So when my life took me to other places, I carried that with me. Since middle school, I’ve felt a need to belong to community and to be an active participant and contributor in community.

I did a program with Mujeres Unidas Contra El Sida which is a community organization in San Antonio that provides sex education and works in the HIV awareness space. They had this political theatre component, where we would go and put on skits about consent for high school students. In the 2000s! In Texas! We talked about consent and sexual health and even though I was a participant and an actor, I learned so much from that. So I’ve always felt this deep connection between artistry and community.

I think I ran away from pursuing artistry with my full chest because it just didn’t seem feasible. I mean, I didn’t know anybody who could claim that they had a career as an artist. It never even occurred to me to try and pursue any kind of creative work in a professional sense. So I did other things. I studied linguistics. I started working at the Queer Resource Center, at the Draper Center for Community Partnerships. I did ESL tutoring. I found fulfillment in that kind of work.

There’s nothing like working one-on-one with somebody. Feeling like you’re creating a change together, you know? Because there’s so much in our world that’s worth changing. And it’s worth working on together. So I have always felt that power and it’s later I realized artistry can do that too. I could build a bridge between those worlds.

Drew: Was acting in the sex education skits your first introduction to acting or had you acted before?

Nava: I had done a play in Mexico. I did a kids production of Cats. (laughs) And I had a solo—

Drew: Oh my God! Who were you?

Nava: I don’t remember!

Drew: (laughs)

Nava: Maybe like a rockstar cat? I don’t know. So I had done that. And I would always make these little home videos with my sisters. We played this thing called The Game (laughs) where we created adult versions of ourselves and acted out soap opera lives. We would play that for hours and hours and hours. This adult life we were acting out went on for like five years.

Drew: Wow.

Nava: I genuinely credit The Game as my foundation for acting.

Drew: I have so many questions about this. What was your future? How different is your actual adult life vs. the adult life you imagined as part of The Game?

Nava: Oh my God. So the tea is that, of course, like, I was male assigned at birth and had not come into my trans identity so originally the adult character I was playing was a man. Who was already divorced.

Drew: (laughs)

Nava: But then the storyline was that I remarried to Christina Escalante, an aspiring fashion designer. Then I had to play Christina too. New character! And it was not long before playing The Game meant I was playing Christina Escalante.

Drew: Incredible.

Nava: And then Christina had her own reality show and was trying to hire an assistant. (laughs) There was a whole life that I lived as Christina Escalante. (laughs)

Drew: I’m obsessed. That’s amazing.

Nava: That is egg behavior right there.

Drew: (laughs)

Okay so then what led to Waking Hour? How did you go from The Game to community work to deciding to write, direct, and star in your own film?

Nava: So I realized I wanted to be a showrunner. I wanted to do TV writing. I took some classes in college and that was the vision, so I started getting my scripts together. And then I saw my friend Nana Duffuor do a GoFundMe for a short film project and she had me play a small role in it and I was like— Well, first of all I didn’t know what a short film was at the time. (laughs) When I say that I ran from artistry, I really mean it. I really did not allow myself to dream in that way. So I didn’t know about film festivals or any of that. I didn’t even really know what a director was. I just saw her do it. It was a story about sexual assault and I saw the power in that. It really inspired me to tell my story and that’s where the short film Waking Hour came from.

And then it really came down to a budget consideration. Because who was going to direct it? I didn’t have money to hire somebody. So I just decided to do it. And then who was going to be the actor? How could we find an actor and pay an actor? So I was like okay I’ll do that too.

Drew: Did you do a GoFundMe? Is that how you raised the money to make it?

Nava: I did. We raised $6,000.

Drew: That’s great.

Nava: Yeah.

Drew: Your IMDb page right now is like all… great. (laughs) I think Genera+ion is such a great show, I think Baby Reindeer is so good. Your film is great. April Maxey’s film Work is great. I was on the Outfest shorts jury the year it won so obviously I’m a fan.

And that’s not super common! Especially with trans actors, but even cis actors, you look at their IMDb pages and it’s a real mix. I’m wondering how you approach the industry. How does the other work you’ve done and do impact your approach to what you’re willing to do, what you want to do, and what you maybe say no to?

Nava: Well, first of all shoutout to April Maxey, my bestie, my wifey. She is fantastic and has taught me so much as a filmmaker and as a storyteller. I was so, so blessed to be able to work with her. And it’s something she and I talk about a lot and that I talk about a lot with other people. How do you approach the industry? It does feel like this nebulous, daunting scary thing to figure out. How can we be artists while placing ourselves within an industry?

I always have to return to the art, I have to return to the heart, and I’m lucky that I have a mission. I didn’t come to the industry just to be in front of a camera. I didn’t come to the industry to be famous or even for money. (laughs) There’s times where I’m like, oh Nava you really should think about money a little bit more.

Drew: (laughs)

Nava: But I just didn’t come for any of that. I came into the industry from a short film that I wrote, directed, produced, and starred in off of a GoFundMe budget. And I’ve never felt more alive than on that set. I always want to try to return to that purity.

There are so many layers that get packed onto us in the industry, so I try to use that initial feeling as my guiding light. I don’t want to do work that doesn’t feel good for me, let alone for other people. So I say no. I say no to things that come my way that don’t speak to me. It’s about being honest with yourself. Is this actually meant for me? Do I have something to offer to this part and this story? Be honest with yourself, and have a standard for how you want to be treated. I think there are times when I can tell in the writing. If the character doesn’t feel respected, then I’m not going to be respected as an actor.

Drew: Were you able to find reps who are cool with that approach?

Nava: Yeah, you know, I was very upfront with them. I was like I’m going to say no to things, so y’all are gonna have to deal with that. There is not a world where I am ever going to say yes simply for the sake of opportunity. There has to be meaning involved.

Drew: I admire that so much. I think we’d have a better industry if more people took that approach, while at the same time understanding why people don’t. I mean, money is real. Our capitalist world is real. But I also think people are often encouraged to make certain choices in the industry with the promise that if we do something that doesn’t align with our values it can lead to better things. And I think, especially with trans actors, there are a lot of false promises. Even if they’re hard to resist.

Are you able to take your approach because you come from these other careers? Do you have the attitude that you can always do other things alongside or instead of creative work?

Nava: I’ve been very fortunate to be able to focus only on creative work over the past four years. But for the first time with the strikes, I had to take stock of the reality that I maybe needed to return to other kinds of employment and figure out the vision for my life because of where the industry is at. And so yeah I’ve been working a few things this year. (laughs) And honestly I’ve felt so blessed to have that new perspective and to be reconnecting with community-based work. There’s no departure for me. It’s all just a continuation.

I will say there is something to the idea of one for them, one for me. I’m not going to sit here and say I’m never going to say yes to a check. (laughs) But I think it’s about evaluating in that moment where your integrity lies and if it makes sense to maybe do a commercial or just a movie that’s really fun. Because it’s okay to just have fun!

Drew: Oh, of course!

Nava: I do want to be clear about that. I’ve been telling anyone who will listen that I’m trying to do a comedy.

Drew: I want that for you.

Nava: I did two very heavy, very intense emotional projects back to back — Baby Reindeer and my next short — and I’m good. I have gone through that creative process and gotten what I needed from it. And now I’m feeling that what I need is lightness and sharing joy. And, hey, maybe that comes with a check!

Drew: (laughs)

Nava: There’s a way for it to make sense.


Nava Mau’s Waking Hour can be viewed here and Baby Reindeer is streaming on Netflix

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Drew Burnett Gregory

Drew is a Brooklyn-based writer, filmmaker, and theatremaker. She is a Senior Editor at Autostraddle with a focus in film and television, sex and dating, and politics. Her writing can also be found at Bright Wall/Dark Room, Cosmopolitan UK, Refinery29, Into, them, and Knock LA. She was a 2022 Outfest Screenwriting Lab Notable Writer and a 2023 Lambda Literary Screenwriting Fellow. She is currently working on a million film and TV projects mostly about queer trans women. Find her on Twitter and Instagram.

Drew Burnett has written 525 articles for us.

1 Comment

  1. Great piece – excited to see what Nava does next, hope she gets to do a comedy soon

Comments are closed.

As a Trans Woman Getting Into Stand-Up Comedy, Can I Avoid Jokes About My Identity?

Throughout my teens, Dave Chappelle was my favorite comedian. This is easier to admit than it might seem: As a child, my favorite comedian was Bill Cosby.

My father had a worn VHS copy of Bill Cosby Himself, and would sit my brother and I in front of it. That’s because Cosby was “clean,” meaning the worst swear it contained was “asshole.” We watched it so often that some of the bits — which, I’m pained to admit, remain hilarious — are burned into my memory.

I didn’t decide to take a stand-up comedy class as an act of contrition, necessarily, but I am aware this is an inauspicious origin story. If I ever decide to pursue comedy as a career, I’m going to have to invent one with less-problematic early influences.

This essay isn’t about them, though. I didn’t give stand-up a try “in response” to Dave Chappelle or Ricky Gervais’ controversial recent specials. I did so because I am both a life-long stand-up comedy fan and a trans woman of color, and yet my current favorite working stand-up comedians are James Acaster, Bo Burnham, and Demetri Martin – all cis, straight white men. This puzzled and frustrated me.

I realized what I appreciate most about each of them — and about some older favorites like Mitch Hedberg and Steven Wright — is their comedy typically focuses on one-liners, wordplay, absurdity, and playing with the form of comedy. They tend to tell jokes rather than stories. It seems as though their cis, straight, white maleness means they aren’t forced to comment on their identities in their work. They’re free to be funny in a way others aren’t.

There are three things in stand-up that I’m tired of. The first I share with most everyone: hackneyed reliance on derogatory tropes, i.e. “punching down.” The other two, however, seem to be the bread and butter of modern stand-up comedy: amusing storytelling from one’s life that leans heavily on having lived through an interesting experience rather than having written a clever punchline, and observations and/or explanations about one’s gender, sexuality, or race.

I am a trans woman of color, and being trans is frequently hilarious. But why should straight white men get to have all the fun writing one-liners and wordplay jokes? Why should they get to be absurd and silly, and observational, rather than relatable? I didn’t want to tell stories about my own life. I’ve done enough of that in my writing on this very website. The saying goes that if you can’t find the art you want to see, you have to create it yourself, right? So I signed up for a comedy class to challenge myself: I wanted to write jokes without relying on identity material.

On the first day of class, this intention was shut down immediately.

The class is for beginners, so our teacher said we were going to start with the basics: mining our lives for material and telling amusing stories. If I took the level two class after finishing this one, they said, I could take my comedy writing to the next level.

That was only the first wake-up call. I’m the kind of narcissist who foolishly, and frequently, tells herself, “This shouldn’t be too hard.” Sometimes I’ve been right! In this case, I was very wrong.

At the second class, we each got a few minutes onstage, in front of each other, to try out some of what we’d written the week prior. I bombed hard. It was like I’d never spoken in public before; I read off my phone, I mumbled, I spent far too long getting to my punchlines, and when I finally did they were weak.

Every comedian shares an experience of bombing as part of their origin story. If you come back the next time and try again, they’ll often say, you might have what it takes. I came home that week dejected but determined to try again.

I could work on my confidence and stage presence, but it’s much more difficult than it seems to know what’s funny. I could practice in front of my girlfriend, but she’s biased in my favor, and comedy just hits different from the stage. I couldn’t get a sense of what worked until I got up in front of my teacher and classmates to see what got laughs.

And I did start to figure it out. I followed our teacher’s instructions and mined my life for material, and some of it was pretty funny. I wrote a story about my childhood, and some personal observations about aging. In doing so I began to understand why so many comedians go there, and why so many audiences love it: there’s power in relatability.

One of the reasons comedy is significant is because laughing at someone else’s tender spots subconsciously allows you to laugh at your own. And it’s still possible to be clever within that framework; just like all art, the form itself is not necessarily hackneyed — artists can choose to have a unique point of view or to tread a well-worn path.

Halfway through class, however, we had to start preparing for the showcase: the week after class ended, we’d each get five minutes on the mic on a real stage with a real audience. I had a decision to make: Would I write about gender? The next few classes were my best opportunity to give it a shot with lower stakes. Instead of telling a trans joke in public at an open mic, I could do a soft launch and see how it felt in front of my class of cis, mostly-white fellow comedy students. So I did.

To keep my options open, I decided to take another risk. I disobeyed our teacher slightly by also writing a few observational one-liners and wordplay jokes that were only loosely related to my actual life: about the dentist, cereal mascots, vampires, microwave popcorn. Each of these was inspired by something that had happened recently, but weren’t actually personal.

That week, I tried out both, and the trans jokes did well — perhaps too well. This is where Dave Chappelle re-enters the conversation.

The Fader quotes a Time interview with Chappelle during which he explains why he quite infamously left Chappelle’s Show at the height of its popularity: “[At a taping], one spectator, a white man, laughed particularly loud and long … [Chappelle] wondered if the new season of his show had gone from sending up stereotypes to merely reinforcing them.”

During my trans jokes, there were laughs in places I didn’t expect or desire them. There was “claughter,” when an audience applauds in agreement with a joke’s politics rather than laughs. And, after class, one of my classmates told me how good she thought they were, and I couldn’t tell whether the comment was smarmy or sincere. Like Chappelle, I couldn’t know whether the jokes were inherently problematic, the audience was wrong, I was being too sensitive, or I wasn’t talented enough to pull them off. So I had to cut them.

However, the one-liners and “joke” jokes also performed well. In fact, they performed better than anything else I’d done all class. “Excellent writing” was our teacher’s feedback for me, which was incredibly affirming. So for the showcase, I mixed some relatable stories with a few clever observations, and — with as much humility I can muster — from my perspective it turned out great for a first effort. You be the judge: The set was recorded and it’s on my YouTube.

Maybe I’ll tell versions of the trans jokes at some point — at a queer comedy night, maybe. Or perhaps I’ll get better and will feel more confident with them, or I’ll write better ones. But struggling with these jokes is complicating the reasons I wanted to try stand-up in the first place.

Taking this class, writing jokes, and actually getting on stage shifted my perspective on comedy significantly. I still don’t want to be pigeonholed as a “trans comedian,” and I don’t want to exclusively perform for other queer people. I just want to be a funny comedian who’s trans. Since the showcase, I’ve gone to a handful of open mics. Some of them were explicitly queer and some weren’t. And as expected, nearly every queer and/or trans comedian had a bit about their identity. Some of them were funny! But many of them felt hackneyed.

My greatest fear in doing comedy is being a hack. If I ever felt like I was going there, I’d give up. However, before I took this class, I thought doing any material about being trans would be hackneyed. But I was wrong. Where I thought comics who are queer, trans, women, or of color were being boxed in by their identities, I was actually the one boxing myself in by avoiding it.

True liberation, of course, is neither being pigeonholed into joking about gender and sexuality all the time, nor being forced to avoid those topics. Observational jokes divorced from one’s identity aren’t a “purer” form of comedy. It’s true that I tend to prefer both writing and listening to them, but I also had a blast writing some clever little takes on true stories from my life.

I can take inspiration from Chappelle’s story without necessarily conforming to his example for how the rest of his career played out. I’m going to follow the laughter, but also focus on being positive and keep my moral compass about me. If I write something truly funny to say about being trans, or come up with amusing and relatable stories from my life, I’ll give them a try. I’m not going to prioritize queer open mics, but I’m not going to shy away from them either.

To my embarrassment, it also became clear I’d overlooked the depth in my favorite comedians’ work. James Acaster’s absurd premises are actually a clever smokescreen for introspective storytelling. Demetri Martin’s graphs and drawings provide piercing insight into his psyche. And, of course, Bo Burnham’s Make Happy was deeply personal underneath its confrontational veneer, and Inside was one of the most revelatory pieces of comedic work I’ve ever seen. I can also take inspiration from them – just not in the way I thought.

Some of the open mics I’ve been to recently have gone well and some have gone poorly. Some things I thought were hilarious have bombed, and some I thought were silly and ill-considered have killed. Comedy is fickle, which is part of what makes it exhilarating. I’ve met and been introduced to a bunch of queer, trans, women, and people of color comedians who are doing hilarious work. I enjoy watching Tig Notaro, Rachel Mac, Patti Harrison, and Angella Dravid, for example, but I’m still searching for comics who scratch that particular “one-liner” itch. (If you’re reading this and want to make some suggestions in the comments, by the way, please do.)

I’ve actually booked a couple of feature slots at comedy shows over the next few months. At this point, I have about 15 minutes of decent material to work with. About half of my best stuff is storytelling and the other half are observational jokes. Trans jokes are not yet part of that archive of material, but they could be eventually — I think I have a decent bit I’m working on about choosing my own name that might be pretty good. The only way I’ll know is by trying them out onstage.

I’m no longer puzzled, frustrated, or worried about this tricky aspect of comedy — now I’m excited. I feel as free as I once imagined the straight, white, cis men comedians felt. I know what I like about my favorite comics, and I’ve expanded my palette for others — and for myself.

If you’re in Portland, OR, come see me onstage sometime and let me know what you think.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Abeni Jones

Abeni Jones is a trans woman of color artist, educator, writer, and designer living in the Bay Area, CA.

Abeni has written 91 articles for us.