Bigot Bingo Puts the “Fun” Back in Fundamentally Flawed Argument

Whenever I look up news on queer issues, I feel like I’m reading the same article again and again.

On Monday at a Princeton talk, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court defended his decisions condemning homosexuality. Scalia repeated his point that banning sodomy was morally on par with banning bestiality and murder.

Whenever I look at ludicrous coverage like this, I have to to double check that I’m not reading Mad Libs. They are just as nonsensical but sadly not as funny. All you have to do is find a homophobic story, remove a few specifics and you’re left with a news template for the next decade or so.

In (Disappointingly Unprogressive Region), (Irrelevant White Guy) of the (Group with Vaguely Religious Ties) came out against (Form of Civil Rights). (Irrelevant White Guy) argued that they are not homophobic, but they just want to protect (Supposedly Powerless Anti-Gay Group) from the (Negative Emotion) of seeing gay people (Civil Rights Verb Ending in -ed).

Or you can translate it and use it to interpret all of your French news! Hollande has reiterated that he will take the draft bill to parliament in January, but you know that someone’s going to protest before then.

En (Région désespérément régressive), (Homme blanc sans importance) du (Groupe aux prétentions religieuses nébuleuses) a pris position contre (Tel droit humain). (Homme blanc sans importance – encore) a souligné qu’ils ne sont pas homophobes, ils veulent seulement protéger (Groupe anti-homos soi-disant vulnérable) de (Une émotion négative) parce qu’ils auraient vu des homosexuels en train de (Verbe de l’expression d’un droit humain).

Look how easily you can write the news! Same-sex marriage is coming soon to a UK near you, so of course there’s trouble. Even though Culture Secretary Maria Mille, made a “quadruple legal lock” to protect religious groups and made it explicitly clear that said religions were banned from performing same-sex marriages because they really don’t want to, some old dudes still got their boxers in a knot.

In (England), (a spokesperson) of the (Coalition for Marriage) came out against (same-sex marriage). (The writer) argued that they are not homophobic, but they just want to protect (Christians, Jews, Muslims and others) from the (legal nightmare) of seeing gay people (redefine marriage).

Same deal up north.

In (Scotland), (Rev Alan Hamilton) of the (Church of Scotland) came out against (civil partnerships or same sex marriage). (Hamilton) argued that they are not homophobic, but they just want to protect (religious bodies and ministers and people of faith) from (getting hurt) by seeing gay people (get gay married).

I never know if I should laugh or cry anymore. On one side of things I could have a career ahead of me as The Most Depressed Clairvoyant Ever or I could continuously beat my head against a wall with each irrational argument. Given that everyone uses the same “logic” to come out against gay rights, why not make news into a game? Nothing lightens up a white-knuckled homophobic debate like a rousing game of Bingo!

Just keep a card in your pocket so the next anti-gay discussion is a little bit more bearable. Accidentally turned on Fox News? BINGO!  Checking in on Bryan Fisher? BINGO! Watching conservative news coverage of France’s December 16th rallies for same-sex rights? BINGO! Have to hang out with some Conservative family members and eat a turkey? BINGO!  

Who knew oppression could be so fun?

Before you go! It takes funding to keep this publication by and for queer women and trans people of all genders running every day. And support from readers like you keeps the majority of our site free for everyone. Still, 99.9% of our readers do not support. Autostraddle is fundraising right now to keep our site funded through January 2022. Will you join our community of readers in helping to keep us around?

Hailing from Vancouver, Kristen's still trying to figure out how to survive Montreal's Real Legitimate Canadian Winter. So far she's discovered that warm socks, giant toques and Tabby kittens all play a role in her survival. Her ultimate goal is to rank higher than KStew in the "Kristen + Autostraddle" Google Search competition.

Kristen has written 138 articles for us.

17 Comments

  1. This is great. Although I secretly suspect that 99% of all arguments boil down to Because Ewww!

    Can I also add that this “quadruple lock” thing (which sounds like a wrestling manoeuvre/orgy position) specifically for the Church of England has a special, ironic hilarity. They keep spouting on about not redefining marriage, but remember back to your history lessons, kids… Why was the Church of England established?

    BECAUSE A GUY WANTED TO REDEFINE MARRIAGE.

    BLAAAAARRRRGGGHHH !

  2. I can’t figure out how to log in right now??
    Anyway, I really want to fill this out and anonymously send it to someone and be like “Congratulations!!!! You won Bigot Bingo!!!!!!”
    This is possibly not a good temptation.

  3. Aye, the fourth part of the ‘quadruple lock’ was what made me go “Buh?” also. You can’t ban religions from doing things that aren’t affecting the rights and freedoms of others! That’s not right. You can’t make them marry the gays, but you can’t ban them from marrying the gays if they think god’s okay with it. Come on now.

  4. I don’t understand how Scalia cannot recuse himself from the DOMA/Prop 8 cases. This man has SUCH a personal stance and bias against the LGBT community. It makes me crazy.

    I agreed with him ONCE during my law school career, his dissent in Johnson v. California. Every other time, I roll my eyes and tried not to vomit while reading his opinions.

  5. Pingback: Bisexual Advice

Contribute to the conversation...

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated by the guidelines laid out in our comment policy. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation and thanks for stopping by!