New Jersey Ruling Calls for Legalizing Gay Marriage, Chris Christie Plans to Appeal Like A Total Jerk

A New Jersey judge ruled Friday morning that the state must follow in the federal government’s footsteps and recognize marriages between same-sex partners.

The suit filed by Garden State Equality points to the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor, the landmark decision that struck down the Defense of Marriage Act and officially recognizes same-sex marriages on a federal level. Currently, same-sex couples in New Jersey can enter into civil unions, and in 2006 the state’s top court ruled that those unions must be granted the same legal rights and protections as marriage. Now, Judge Mary Jacobsen has taken things one step further, ruling that barring same-sex couples from marriage is a violation of the New Jersey constitution. This is one of the mounting numbers of victories for equality and for gay families stemming directly from the repeal of DOMA, including stories like the fact that Jennifer Tobits was recently allowed to receive benefits from her late wife’s employer.

A spokesman for Governor Chris Christie stated shortly after the ruling was announced the governor plans to appeal the ruling, meaning there’s no certainty New Jersey couples will be signing licenses any time soon. Christie has opposed marriage equality in his state with increasingly nonsensical rhetoric for some time now; especially given his possibly aiming for a Presidential nomination in 2016, he may be very motivated to stop marriage equality in its tracks. He’s also in the middle of a race for re-election against Barbara Buono, who supports marriage equality and also has a gay daughter. Christie’s statement on the matter, delivered by his spokesman Michael Drewniak, was:

“Gov. Christie has always maintained that he would abide by the will of the voters on the issue of marriage equality and called for it to be on the ballot this Election Day… Since the legislature refused to allow the people to decide expeditiously, we will let the Supreme Court make this constitutional determination.”

In many ways, what’s happening in New Jersey feels reminiscent of Prop 8 — conservatives trying to stand in the way of marriage equality because it’s “the will of voters” and ignoring the constitution feels pretty familiar. But with DOMA’s repeal, the story might be very different this time. For now, this looks like it could be a victory — or at least a step in the right direction.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!


Kaitlyn lives in New York, which is the simplest answer you're going to get if you ask her where she's from. She went to journalism school and is arguably making the most of her degree as a writer and copy editor. She utilizes her monthly cable bill by watching more competitive cooking shows than should be allowed.

Kaitlyn has written 69 articles for us.


  1. We need an across-the-board decision by the Federal Government. Here in TN, they’ve gone as far as to create a new holiday- “Traditional Marriage Day” in which the wording of the bill quotes The Holy Bible. Why does the State feel it has the right to continually define marriage? Exactly what is “Traditional” Marriage in Tennessee seeing as even Interracial Marriage is STILL outlawed by the State Constitution along with Same Sex Marriage?

  2. I can’t decide who the bigger douche of the week is: Christie or Guido Barilla? (,0,1652350.story)

    On the one hand, I now have to be careful about eating spaghetti at a restaurant because I don’t want to end up with anti-gay antipasta inside me.

    On the other hand, this ass of a governor may be the GOP (Gay Offending Party)’s presidential nominee down the road…

    It’s really a toss up. I’ll go with Christie because I’d rather get married/have other people get married than eat pasta but I’ll be damned if Guido is going to ruin my fantasy of a “Lady and the tramp” moment (except more like “Lady and the other lady” in my version). I WONT LET THAT HAPPEN.

  3. Thank you for the grounded, informative article. So many stories about this seem to be pretending that we’ve won marriage equality for good in NJ, which of course isn’t the case. It’s creating a lot of confusion.

  4. I don’t really have anything to add to this except to say that with a name like “Chris Christie” he really needs to be coming up with his own Victor Victoria routine. It might help him work through some issues.

Comments are closed.