BREAKING: Supreme Court Will Consider Both Prop 8 and DOMA

by Laura and Rachel
Last Friday, we reported the the Supreme Court declined to take action on any of the ten cases surrounding same-sex marriage that currently sit before them. As Rachel pointed out, these cases aren’t about the whether or not marriage equality is coming soon to a city hall near you. Instead, the Supreme Court makes a decision on each case which, in turn, has larger legal ramifications.

Of the ten cases currently petitioning SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari, eight address DOMA, one challenges Prop 8 and one disputes an Arizona law that restricts health benefits to legally married same-sex couples. Overturning DOMA would legalize same-sex marriage on a federal level but would not require states to perform such marriages. Invalidating California’s Prop 8 or Arizona’s health care law, on the other hand, would legalize same-sex marriage in their respective states and could open the door for more states to following but would have no effect on federal legislation.

The DOMA cases hoping to find their way to the Supreme Court docket are already fairly familiar. Three of the cases are appeals to May’s 1st circuit decision in Boston that found DOMA to be unconstitutional. Four challenge the 2nd circuit’s ruling in favor Edie Windsor. The last deals with the lawsuit that Karen Golinski filed after her employer, the federal government, denied her wife spousal health coverage.

As of today, the Supreme Court has announced that it will in fact take up the issue of same-sex marriage by reviewing BOTH Prop 8 and DOMA. This means that the Supreme Court will consider both the question of whether the federal government is obligated to consider same-sex marriage valid, and whether it’s constitutional to deny same-sex couples the right to marry.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our A+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining A+ and supporting the people who make this indie queer media site possible?

Join A+!


Laura is a tiny girl who wishes she were a superhero. She likes talking to her grandma on the phone and making things with her hands. Strengths include an impressive knowledge of Harry Potter, the ability to apply sociology to everything under the sun, and a knack for haggling for groceries in Spanish. Weaknesses: Chick-fil-a, her triceps, girls in glasses, and the subjunctive mood. Follow the vagabond adventures of Laura and her bike on twitter [@laurrrrita].

Laura has written 308 articles for us.


  1. This update just made my upcoming finals week SO much more tolerable!

    …not that they’re related at all, just that now I have so much more hope for the future of my marriage, unlike my future grade in Organic Chemistry…

  2. DOMA could get overturned around the same time as my college graduation. As in I could enter the real world with real(ish) rights. THIS IS SO CRAZY AWESOME.

    I really really really hope that the Supreme Court doesn’t screw us all over.

    • as somebody not from the states my all caps excitement might be a little weird but it’s just that my 12 year old self once wrote in a journal that if she’s getting married it’s gonna be to somebody who speaks english so this is helpful because that little brat always got what she wanted. also equality! :)

  3. I thought this would never happen. Coming from Washington, it was difficult to even understand when my friend announced that we could go ahead and start getting married, I noted, “I thought that we had to wait til December 6th?” He explained to me that it *was* December 6th! It just felt so far away… I’m bewildered as to how far this has come even in my young,young queer life…

    • I thought the same thing when I heard they plan to announce their decision the final week of June. It’s either going to be an epic celebration or a great time to drown our sorrows!

  4. I am excited but also scared because 5 of the 9 judges are conservatives. Maybe Obama would get a chance to appoint a judge before June. I mean Clarence Thomas could have an MI (a little one just enough to bench him) or a scandal that makes him want to “spend more time with his family”. Make it happen universe!

    • But at the same time, Kennedy identifies as more of a libertarian, and has voted in favor of LGBT rights before. So I think we’ve got a pretty good shot even without a new judge.

Contribute to the conversation...

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated by the guidelines laid out in our comment policy. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation and thanks for stopping by!