On Friday, Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty pledged that Ontario students — not administrators — would be the ones to determine whether or not LGBT support groups formed at their schools.
In a statement read by MPP Glen Murray at Toronto Pride’s international marshals’ reception, McGuinty, who was not able to attend, said that rather than school administrators deciding whether to have groups, if the students want one, they will get it:
“I know that student support groups for LGBT students have been controversial in some schools. We need to move beyond that. We need to be supportive and accepting of all our kids. And I am proud that effective this September, high school students who want their school to have a student support group for LGBT students will have one.
This is not a matter of choice for school boards or principals. If students want it, they will have it. We live in a world where teens are still taking their lives because of homophobia and we owe it to them to get them the support they deserve. It’s all a matter of being understanding and supportive.”
Rather than creating a new policy, the statement strongly affirms something already in place — Ontario schools have been technically supposed to allow gay-related groups for a while, but in practice, Catholic schools and school boards haven’t been accommodating. The Ontario Catholic school system only started allowing groups that focus on homophobia and transphobia specifically, instead of “equity” clubs to address discrimination in general, in April of this year. And they still don’t allow gay-straight alliances or group names that emphasize being gay over being Catholic, which is why St. Joseph Catholic Secondary School, in Mississauga, banned rainbows last month.
According to Xtra, Murray called the statement “a huge step forward” and said that “rights are never easily won. It’s always a battle. And this is a victory.”
![89551419](https://www.autostraddle.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/89551419.jpg?resize=506%2C337)
these girls from getty images need a support group
Catholic educators have expressed concern about GSAs for a variety of reasons. One member of the Ontario Catholic School Trustees’ Association thinks that GSAs are “associated with activist groups, and the purpose of our clubs will be to provide support, not activism.” Another said that, “There’s a lingering concern … that early identification of sexual orientation may not be in the best interest of all students, and that really was one of the initial objections. And that still remains.”
However, McGuinty’s statement doesn’t explicitly allow gay-straight alliances, but “student support groups,” something that Murray also confirmed in a text message to Xtra:
“Premier McGuinty did not use the words ‘GSAs.’ He said ‘support groups for LGBT youth.’ Starting in September, it will be students, not principals or school boards that will decide whether a school has an LGBT support group. I emphasize he also did not say ‘generic support groups or diversity groups’; he said specifically ‘an LGBT support group.’ He did not, however, use the words GSA.”
According to Leanne Iskander, a grade 11 student at St. Joseph and the founder of the non-GSA GSA “Open Arms,” this is not good enough:
“It bothers me that [McGuinty] hasn’t specifically said they’re allowing GSAs. […] I don’t think what he’s saying is allowed now is much different from what we have…but they made us call [our group] Open Arms, which is so generic and no one knows what it is. There’s no point having the support there if students don’t know it’s there, so the name is important.”
This entire situation seems to have been going in circles for months. Ontario grudgingly allows gay groups. Catholic schools ignore this. Ontario says, no really. Catholic schools allow “diversity groups.” Lots of people on both sides get upset about this. Ontario says, no, really. Catholic schools say, well maybe, but we’re uncomfortable. Ontario says, no comment on the phrase “gay-straight alliance.” Catholic schools say they’re still uncomfortable. I hit my head against my desk. Etc.
According to Xtra, this situation might become a campaign issue as Ontario heads towards the October 6 general election. Let’s hope it is.
I love that they banned rainbows. What to they do if it rains, throw curtains over the windows because nature might give them the gay? (Oh, wait…)
And like, what if you’re in science class, and learning about prisms, and rainbows accidentally escape onto the walls and touch the students and cause a massive gay orgy?
Or if some students were standing in line and they were wearing shirts that made a rainbow and then the gay version of Captain Planet would appear and make everyone gay?
Captain Gaymo, he’s our hero, gonna take het’ro sex down to zero…
THIS
You know, I’m sure in some alternate reality, all these stupid religiously-based schooling would actually endorse homosexuality because (to them) it’s still technically not real sex so you can be an abstinent lesbian ‘cuz we don’t have sex rite???
In this reality though, I’m glad at least McGuinty has re-re-readdressed this issue. The fact this is even a thing makes me very angry and want to re-do high school again (because we had a GSA, and I wish I had been in musicals…)
I love it how the Catholics now hate rainbows. Teh irony. It keels me.
Floods that cover the whole earth are THE BEST. God was just trying to ruin our future plans for recreational zoo boating.
Does this mean skittles are a no go too? Damn this school sucks the joy out of everything.
I could see Catholic schools finding tasting the rainbow problematic. ;)
I went to a public Catholic school in Ontario. Aside from other messed up policies (health counsellors secretly meeting kids on the edge of school property to give them birth control, anti-choice wall posters, abstinence-only workshops that shamed girls and were against using condoms) any plans for a GSA got a firm no from the staff. Social justice/diversity clubs were run in a Christian context, and skipped over issues of gay bullying entirely.
My grade 12 philosophy teacher went on a 20-minute rant about how the school’s LGBTQ students were making a choice, and that gay is a disease of the mind that could be cured by lifelong chastity and prayer. If students wanted to talk about non-hetero feelings, we were directed to a chaplain, priest, or social worker.
Thank God for feminist, allied social workers or a lot us wouldn’t have made it through high school.
I just graduated from a Catholic high school in Ontario… our school put on The Wizard of Oz, and for the longest time the unfinished display for it was just a big rainbow in the trophy case… the first time I saw it I got all excited thinking it was a pride flag, but alas. A couple weeks later they put up cardboard silhouettes of Dorothy and co. over top of it.
We didn’t have a GSA, obviously, but we did have a social justice club… which I guess could include LGBT issues.
thank you for not saying “ect” at the end of the article. because obviously that is tantamount to article murder.
good article + poor language usage = facepalm on a desk of nails with laser sharks and the killer rabbit of caerbannog
so i guess this article was like the holy hand grenade of antioch?
i think this is why i try to stay out of my head as much as possible.
I loved the no-frills analysis in the second to last paragraph. Perfectly summed up the situation!
Pingback: Ontario Coalition for Accountability » Coptic Church Defends Students’ Rights to be Homophobic