Vermont, New York: Glimmers of Hope In Bleak Sea Of Abortion News

If you’ve been paying attention at all to news about reproductive health in the past few years, you know that lawmakers all over the U.S. have been cracking down on uterus-havers’ right to healthcare, mainly targeting access to abortion. From the now widespread Targeted Restrictions on Abortion Providers (TRAP) to the current tragedy in Texas, where a pregnant woman’s family has been forced to keep her on life support until her pregnancy comes to term, 2011-2013 saw more abortion restrictions enacted than the entire previous decade.

2014 doesn’t look a whole lot more promising for abortion access in the U.S., but Vermont and New York have bills on the horizon to affirm uterus-havers’ right to an abortion.

The Vermont bill, S 315, was introduced in the state senate on Tuesday, and aims to repeal state statutes that pre-date Roe v. Wade. By repealing these statutes, which are already unenforceable due to the outcome of Roe, the legislation affirms reproductive rights in Vermont, and clarifies healthcare providers’ ability to perform abortions. The current bill does not explicitly guarantee the right to terminate a pregnancy, which another bill that died in committee last year did.

Additionally, New York is slated to revisit the ten-point Women’s Equality Act, which was proposed last year. The Act’s failure last year is attributed to the unpopularity of a point that would have written Roe v. Wade into state law. NY Governor Andrew Cuomo is a strong supporter of the Act, including the Roe measure, and is pushing for it to be revisited this year. If it goes through, keep an eye out for a push to include protections for trans* women, which the first iteration of the bill neglected to include.

It’s hard to say what these two bills represent in the broader picture of reproductive health in the United States. The U.S. is still the same country that kicked off 2014 with Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor issuing a temporary stay on enforcement of contraceptive coverage by the Affordable Care Act. Also today, the U.S. House of Representatives heard testimony on HR7, the No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act, which NARAL reports cuts funding for low-income people’s access to abortion in DC. While the VT and NY bills are positive developments in a sea of bleak news about abortion access, it’s important to remember that they are already progressive states with good histories of access to reproductive healthcare.

As we continue into 2014, it is still essential that we remain vigilant to uterus-havers’ rights to abortion across the U.S.

feature image by Rick Pluta

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!


Autostraddle staff writer. Copy editor. Fledgling English muffin maker. Temporary turtle parent. Zine creator. Swings enthusiast. Political human who cares a lot about healthcare and queer anti-carceral feminisms. I asked my friend to help me write this bio and they said, "Good-natured. Friend. Earth tones." Another friend said, "Flannel babe. Vacuum lover. Kind." So. Find me on Twitter or my website.

Maddie has written 100 articles for us.


  1. It’s so upsetting that the “glimmers of hope” we have to cling to aren’t even an advancement of rights, but rather an affirmation of rights we were already supposed to have guaranteed 30 years ago.

Comments are closed.