Westboro Baptist Church vs. Computer Hackers: Are We All Just In It For the LULZ?

As you may or may not recall, last week, a press release purportedly from hacker-collective Anonymous threatened to take down the Westboro Baptist Church:

ANONYMOUS cannot abide this behavior any longer. The time for us to be idle spectators in your inhumane treatment of fellow Man has reached its apex, and we shall now be moved to action. Thus, we give you a warning: Cease & desist your protest campaign in the year 2011, return to your homes in Kansas, & close your public Web sites. Should you ignore this warning, you will meet with the vicious retaliatory arm of ANONYMOUS: We will target your public Websites, and the propaganda & detestable doctrine that you promote will be eradicated; the damage incurred will be irreversible, and neither your institution nor your congregation will ever be able to fully recover.

The Westboro Baptist Church, as I’m sure you’re aware, were sent here by God to reveal the truth of the scriptures to America which more or less amounts to “God Hates Fags.” Westboro responded to the purported threat with a ragey psychotic flier, as is their way:

But Anonymous denied involvement with the press release, claiming Westboro themselves did it for attention. Generally the media seems to be buying this theory, and although it seems highly unlikely that Anonymous was involved in the press release (more on that in a minute), I honestly don’t think Fred Phelps reads past the first page of the newspaper. Yes, I realize that God created the internet for the Westboro Baptist Church to send its message but is Westboro really sophisticated enough to understand Anonymous or 4chan culture?

Consequently, it’s hard to tell if Anonymous genuinely believes Westboro did it, genuinely believes someone else did it, or genuinely did it themselves. Anonymous, with its roots in troll society, is likely volleying this accusation not because they’re certain it’s true but because they like f*cking with people and accusing someone of doing something they didn’t do is one of the best ways to f*ck with people EVER.

But then — godhatesfags.com did indeed go offline –and “Patriot hacker” The Jester  has taken credit for the denial of service attacks on Westboro’s sites. Prior Jester targets include WikiLeaks and jihadist websites.

In a twitter update, The Jester announced: 

SO. Then, Radio talk show host David Pakman invited Shirley Phelps-Roper and Anonymous to duke it out on his show for a live web chat. Shirley’s ranting and determination to start a “war” with Anonymous eventually annoyed A so much that he hacked the website while they were on air, which was, in a word, AMAZING:


This is what the downloads.westborobaptistchurch.com website says now:

In the interview, the Anonymous rep says the press release doesn’t sound like their kind of writing. This is true. Anonymous is not generally primarily concerned with anybody’s “inhumane treatment.” One of their recent projects, Send Justin Bieber to North Korea, attempted to rig a “Where Should Justin Go On His Tour?” vote to, you guessed it, send Justin Bieber to North Korea. They won, of course, and are currently attempting to thwart Justin Bieber’s own refusal to go to North Korea. Anonymous does not aim for social justice. Anonymous aims for motherfuckery and lulz.

Even if you hadn’t heard of Anonymous until this week, you may be familiar with their work — the LOLCat craze and rickrolling originated with Anonymous. They’ve successfully executed a series of “troll invasions” including bombarding the Epilepsy Foundation’s online forums with flashing animation intended to induce seizure. Anonymous’s Encyclopedia Dramatica wiki, which is described by Wired.com as where “the vast parallel universe of Anonymous in-jokes, catchphrases, and obsessions is lovingly annotated,” features “flamingly racist and misogynist content… all of it calculated to offend, along with links to eye-gougingly horrific images of mutilation, sexual perversity, and, yes, kittens in blenders.”

But this isn’t the first time that good deeds and motherfuckery have accidentally aligned.



Anonymous vs. The Church of Scientology

See: Project Chanology. When a nine-minute YouTube video of Tom Cruise talking crazy about Scientology surfaced on the internet, the Church of Scientology did what they always do — sent takedown notices to sites hosting the video, using copyright law to back up their control freakish tendencies.

Anonymous didn’t like this and in January of 2008, Anonymous “realized it had nothing better to do than get their collective panties in a twist because there is a cult masquerading as a church” and launched Project Chanology — targeting the Church of Scientology. It’s only fair, they pointed out, because Scientology notoriously uses sketchy and unethical methods to suppress any dissent against their church:

“Your campaigns of misinformation, your suppression of dissent, your litigious nature: All of these things have caught our eye. For the good of your followers, for the good of mankind—and for our own enjoyment—we shall proceed to expel you from the Internet and systematically dismantle the Church of Scientology in its present form.”

WIRED.com details the evolution of Project Chanology in The Assclown Offensive:

Project Chanology has employed a variety of tactics, including pickets, pranks, and propaganda that ranges from the purely informative to the ferociously satirical. It has waxed and waned and waned some more, and yet, improbably, it has endured, evolving into a peculiarly instructive case study in the dynamics of online protest. Project Chanology may well be the first movement to realize the kind of ad hoc, loosely coupled social activism that many have hoped the ad hoc, loosely coupled architecture of the Internet would engender. But it’s also the first one founded on the principles of the most obnoxious innovation that architecture ever produced: trolling.

How exactly did Anonymous become the Church of Scientology’s most formidable foe? According to WIRED, “the answer may be that the church is incapable of following one simple bit of Internet wisdom: Don’t Feed the Trolls. By taking Anonymous as seriously as it has, Scientology has nurtured the one thing Chanology depends on above all: the lulz.”

Which brings us back to Westboro Baptist Church.

The Big Question: Why Are We Talking About This?

Some have argued that talking about anything they do is, essentially, feeding the trolls, and that we should stop covering their activities. Our reactions fuel the fire of trolls, whether that be flame wars or the flaming pits of hell.

But like any good parody, it could be argued that Westboro holds up a funhouse mirror to less radical hate groups and that in and of itself is a worthy reason to — when it does produce lulz — allow them to enter the spotlight. The “God Hates Fags” agenda honestly isn’t too far from what more organized anti-gays have come up with — it’s just more direct and less pallatable. You won’t find NOM protesting the funerals of fallen soldiers, but just like Westboro they quote scripture. Anti-gay groups all over the country use HIV/AIDS as an “example” of why gays are evil and will make everyone sick and die.

You know how we get upset when we feel a gay-rights group is getting too “radical” or “making us look bad”? Well, all this attention on Westboro makes anti-gay groups look pretty bad too. And when it comes to recruiting a new generation of anti-gay activists — well, nothing makes you look quite as bad as not knowing how to use a computer.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!


Riese is the 41-year-old Co-Founder of Autostraddle.com as well as an award-winning writer, video-maker, LGBTQ+ Marketing consultant and aspiring cyber-performance artist who grew up in Michigan, lost her mind in New York and now lives in Los Angeles. Her work has appeared in nine books, magazines including Marie Claire and Curve, and all over the web including Nylon, Queerty, Nerve, Bitch, Emily Books and Jezebel. She had a very popular personal blog once upon a time, and then she recapped The L Word, and then she had the idea to make this place, and now here we all are! In 2016, she was nominated for a GLAAD Award for Outstanding Digital Journalism. She's Jewish and has a cute dog named Carol. Follow her on twitter and instagram.

Riese has written 3211 articles for us.


  1. You know, Anonymous would be the sort of fuckers that would take down something WE hold precious, too.
    Howevet, Its capricious whims are almost so seemingly random and nonsequitous at times that hell, it’s like getting pissed off at the weather.
    They are the righteous wrath of weather on the internet. Effective but frequently unfair, they really sort of challenge our notions of what really IS unfair.
    Also, I belong to a different web community that displays much of the same pre-adolescent and filthy poor humor that just remains self-contained, so I appreciate them to the fullest, especially when they are at their fucking worst.

  2. I keep looking down at the hot pocket I’m eating and seeing Fred Phelps’s face. RAWRRR OM NOM NOM

  3. “the only reason the internet exists is for Westboro Baptist Church to tell this nation & this world that your destruction draws nigh”
    …and porn.

  4. I actually believe that the Phelps clan and co. sent out the first declaration of war from Anonymous. It makes a lot of sense. Anonymous is a strong supporter of Wikileaks, and last month or something, there was a big huge hullabaloo about doing a DDoS attack on sites such as Amazon, Visa, Paypal and Mastercard. Some script kiddy from the Netherlands got caught and is now getting his pants sued off. They also did a DDoS attack on the Zimbabwean government’s websites, and now some guys from the UK are being arrested as well.

    WBC sees this, and being the enormous RL trolls that they are, figure that they can troll the trolls and get some more money out of this. They make their site into a honeypot, so that they can capture the information of the hackers (who are usually not really all that computer savvy, but just another person like you or me who runs a script that a real hacker wrote up). They can now take that information, and sue the hackers’ pants off! Money, money, and publicity. Judging by the Jester’s tweet, they did indeed set up a honeypot but he managed to bypass it.

    • oh yeah good point — i don’t think they’re looking to sue though. they generally stay away from the police, government and law as much as they can — apparently the police did not care when someone maybe bombed a place or something that was their’s (probs b/c the police wanted them out of town as well) and now they don’t trust them or any of those people. also i feel like if they tried to do that it wouldn’t be difficult for the other side to find out who did it

    • When I first started the video and saw her crazy wide eyes and manic smile I thought “WHAT IS THIS I DONT EVEN THAT WOMAN IS INSANE”, and then she opened her mouth and it got worse.

      • it’s frightening, the people who will smile such beatific smiles as filth spewes out of their mouths. it throws me. i like people’s expressions to match their words, it’s just crazynuts otherwise.

        • I agree. I also am wary when peoples facial expressions and body language are not congruent with what they’re saying. Not like it really matter in this instance though – She’s just batshit crazy either way.

          • If you had to tell someone that they have cancer or their kid just died, or were giving out seriously bad news in general, it would be a horrible, horrible thing to have to say and it would show. The wbc sees hell as the most atrocious of places and basically the worst thing ever ( although the wbc’s version of hell seems to be much like earth but without wbc people, which sounds pretty good to me). She speaks of this terrible place and all the terrible people that will go there – i.e., everyone but them – and delivers this woeful news with frivolity and enthusiasm all wrapped up in a smile.
            Freaky, scary shit… and possibly sociopathic.

        • It reminds me of when the kill-the-gays guy from Uganda was on The Rachel Maddow Show, and he was all calm and serious and nice sounding, until you listened to his words and realized he was BATSHIT INSANE. It’s really scary. I want my batshit insane people to sound batshit.

  5. “you know that we don’t do that, that’s not how we roll” -Shirley Phelps-Roper
    Ha, right, they’re definitely too morally correct for that type of stuff.

    • She sounds like my grandma after she watches Jersey Shore in order to appear more youthful…although much like Westboro my grandma has no idea how to use a computer.
      Shirley Phelps-Roper: “BUSTED!”

      The older folk that are with FOX News and Westboro are the type that would pay for something that they can find elsewhere for free. That’s why younger generations won’t be hitching up anytime soon…well, that’s my theory.

  6. The WBC basically poked the bear one too many times.

    I wouldn’t try to understand anonymous it’s pretty much where the misunderstood live.

  7. That woman is a seriously nasty piece of work. However, given her behaviour, one can only concluded that if the deity she believes in actually exists, she’s hell-bound, which would be a cute irony! Not that I believe that, unfortunately.

    Recommend this video for light entertainment on the WBC front: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8cN2pB3MCE

  8. 4chan is what it is. Pure Anarchism. With a capital ‘A’. If there’s any theme to what Anonymous does, it’s standing in the way of control…any control.

    Westboro doesn’t control anything. They’re like mosquitoes that make us itch every once in awhile. And now they just bit Anonymous.

    • an·ar·chism
      noun \ˈa-nər-ˌki-zəm, -ˌnär-\ 1. a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups

      2: the advocacy or practice of anarchistic principles (Merriam-Webster)

      i.e. nothing to do with Anonymous. My politiks, U iz mizreprusentin them.

  9. wow the fucking with the epilepsy forums is a definite high grade A douchenozzle.

    I wouldn’t really be surprised if Anonymous didn’t do it for any reason at except that it tickles them; they seem skeezy.

  10. I have always enjoyed the antics of Anonymous. While they are pretty much centered around motherfuckery, I appreciate how they go about it. Their aura of mystery and collective intelligence is really appealing in some messed up way. I like what they are doing to WBC. As a Kansan, I hate that the WBC has messed with the reputation of this state. Honestly, I swear, we aren’t all bigots here.

  11. anonymous does not war with trolls.
    anonymous likes free speech.
    anonymous blah blah blah anonnews blah.
    blah blah blah blah wudoin?

    we have more pressing matters in the middle east- so taking down their site was just to shut them up since they wouldnt shut up about denying them a war. and COS just loves denying freedom of speech, the very basic thought process, and taking money from the weak minded….so anon resonds in the way we know how. In the end- yes things are done for lulz but also because the freedom of speech and right to knowledge are the focus.

    We are Anonymous
    We are Legion.
    We do not forgive.
    We do not forget.
    Expect us.

  12. Pingback: World Spinner

  13. “The Westboro Baptist Church, as I’m sure you’re aware, were sent here by God to reveal the truth of the scriptures to America which more or less amounts to ‘God Hates Fags.'”

    Hehe.. a little gem there

Comments are closed.