Agreement on Anoka-Hennepin Lawsuit Ends “Neutrality Policy,” Gives Hope

After nine students killed themselves in relatively short succession in the school district of Anoka-Hennepin, MN, six students worked with the Southern Poverty Law Center and the National Center for Lesbian Rights to bring the school district to court.  Today, an announcement revealed that there’s been an agreement made on behalf of the students who filed the two federal gender and sexual-orientation harassment lawsuits.

The agreement dictates that the school district, the federal government, and the students in question have entered into a “consent decree” — that resolves the current legal dispute as well as drawing to a close an investigation of harassment in the district that was undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Department of Education. Specifically, the decree calls for “significant new protections” when it comes to harassment of LGBT students, with a “comprehensive, systemic plan to counter and prevent future harassment in district education programs and activities.” 

Anoka-Hennepin’s position since 2009 has been one of “neutrality” — an official policy that required teachers and school administrators to “remain neutral on matters regarding sexual orientation including but not limited to student-led discussions.” If you’re reminded by that of the sentiment, attributed to Dante, that “the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality,” you’re not alone. The agreement that’s resulted from this lawsuit specifically provides that “teachers may affirm the dignity and self-worth of students and any protected characteristics of students, such as being LGBT, without running afoul of any district policy.

Other provisions of the agreement call for the school district to:

  • Retain the Great Lakes Equity Center, an equity assistance center based at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis to provide a comprehensive, systemic review and recommend revisions to district policies and practices related to sex and sexual-orientation related harassment.
  • Fully investigate reports of harassment; escalate remedial efforts through additional measures when students are harassed on a repeated basis; and mitigate the effects of harassment that occurs.
  • Take proactive measures to address the hostile environment.
  • Develop procedures for parental notification while maintaining sensitivity to a student’s right of privacy relating to their real or perceived orientation or gender identity.
  • Hire a district-level, harassment-prevention official who will help lead the district’s efforts to “eliminate and prevent future instances of harassment in its education programs and activities.”  This official will be referred to as a Title IX/Equity Coordinator who will ensure the district complies with its legal obligations to protect students from harassment; implement district policies and procedures relating to sex and sexual-orientation based harassment; monitor all complaints of such discrimination and harassment; identify trends or common areas of concern related to compliance; and coordinate between and among school and district staff, students, and parents related to addressing and preventing harassment.
  • Work with the Equity Center, Title IX /Equity Coordinator to develop improved and effective trainings, consistent with best practices, on harassment for all students and employees who interact with students.
  • Ensure that a counselor or other qualified mental health professional to be available during school hours for students in need.
  • Hire a mental health consultant to review and assess current practices in the district relating to assisting students who are subject to harassment.
  • Strengthen its annual anti-bullying survey.
  • Enhance a recently formed harassment-prevention task force to advise the district regarding how to best foster a positive educational climate.
  • Work with the Equity Center to identify hot spots in district schools where harassment is most problematic, including outdoor locations and on school buses, and work with the equity consultant to develop corrective actions.
Some of these provisions are actually fairly remarkable in their insight; while it may sound obvious, it’s not at all safe to assume that any given school has “procedures for parental notification while maintaining a student’s right of privacy relating to their real or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity” (as this case in Utah clearly demonstrates). Some things, like “fully investigate reports of harassment,” are absolutely outrageous things to have to actively demand of any institution which claims to be supportive of and caring for children and teens.

It would be wonderful if Anoka-Hennepin became a much safer and more welcoming place for all teens, and perhaps especially queer and trans ones, as a result of this lawsuit. But it won’t change the fact that this lawsuit — a lawsuit spearheaded by six teens, who have watched the shocking deaths of friends and classmates, and have watched the adults in their community wash their hands of any responsibility in addressing them.

It’s shameful that not only did school officials and adults watch this situation develop, but that the ones who had to take it into their own hands were essentially children. That indicates that not just one person, but a whole host of adults have failed the children of that community to a degree that’s honestly incredible. As the entire narrative of the ‘bullying epidemic’ has shown, there are a chilling number of adults who are more interested in “protecting” kids from the idea of bad things (or in the case of Anoka-Hennepin, maybe protecting themselves) than doing what’s necessary to keep them safe in the real world. So far, there do not seem to be any consent decrees to address that.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!


Originally from Boston, MA, Rachel now lives in the Midwest. Topics dear to her heart include bisexuality, The X-Files and tacos. Her favorite Ciara video is probably "Ride," but if you're only going to watch one, she recommends "Like A Boy." You can follow her on twitter and instagram.

Rachel has written 1142 articles for us.


  1. It’s hard to say whether this or Penn State is the better example of the utter lack of adult leadership in our schools/universities/institutions. Abused and bullied children possess more courage than most of our elected officials, teachers, and sports “heroes,” while the latter’s CYA behavior is justified as “only human.” God forbid we let it besmirch his pristine legacy.

    Admittedly, my high school did *not* have a neutrality policy, but that just meant that my geometry teacher felt no qualms in telling us that, while she had many gay friends, she did believe they would burn in hell. But she said it really nicely! It wasn’t so much a statement of personal homophobia as it was just recitation of accepted opinion at that time and place — the place being Kentucky, the time being, like, 1998? Queers! Doomed to burn! No need to be mean about it! Let the Lord sort it out! Schools have to declare “neutrality” now because there’s actually debate about the dignity and worth of gay people. Back then it wasn’t even really discussed, at least in my high school.

  2. These young people give me hope for the future. They showed incredible strength in the face of unimaginable difficulty.

Comments are closed.