Actually a Good Thing: England Delays Decision on Female Bishops

feature image via The Telegraph

Despite Scotland’s branch of the Anglican Church deeming it legal to ordain female bishops in 2003, it’s taken a while for this news to leak south of the border to England. This week has seen the General Synod debating the ordination of female bishops within England, and on July 9th, they decided – in a nutshell – that they were going to put off deciding. Ridiculously though, it was the best possible result for women. “But HOW can that be?” I hear you wail, while silently cursing the patriarchy. To be fair, I suggest we blame our second-favourite cause of female oppression this time: the Evangelicals.

via the telegraph

The Anglican Church has a complicated decision-making process that involves drafting legislation years in advance of voting on it; this legislation on female bishops has been in the works since February 2009. At the Synod at the beginning of July, the three houses – Bishops, Clergy and Laity – decided to vote on it. Would it be permissible for England to allow female bishops? 42 out of 44 of the diocesan synods support the measure, so it should have been a clear-cut case… except it wasn’t.

The right-leaning members of the Church – comprising mainly of Anglo-Catholics and Evangelical Anglicans – were firmly “theologically opposed” to the measure. No doubt they cracked open the Bible, and pointed to choice bits of rhetoric. Saint Paul is a particular favourite:

A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent –1 Timothy 2.11-12

Biblical teaching like this seems not to have affected the Anglican Church in other countries. The Church of England’s ordination of female bishops is not a New Thing. The first female bishop was Li Tim-Oi, ordained in the Anglican Diocese of Hong Kong and Macao, in 1944. 1944, you guys. That’s… a long time before I was born. That’s ten years before my dad was even born. Barbara Harris was ordained as an Episcopal bishop in Massachusetts in 1989, and female bishops became legal in Ireland (and Northern Ireland) in 1990, though none have yet been consecrated. My girlfriend was born in Belfast that year. It’s mad to think that the entirety of her life, female Anglican bishops have been legal in her country, but not in mine. So seriously, what gives?

It turns out the right-wing presence in the House of Laity was large enough to cause significant problems for the proposed legislation, and in May a late amendment to the legislation was tabled. This resulted in Clause 5.1 being hastily added in an attempt to appease them: in essence, it states that any parish that doesn’t want a female bishop can opt to have a male bishop installed who shares their views on women in the church. Not just “a male bishop”, but a male bishop who agrees that women are incapable of ordering and ordaining male clergy within the church.

This created a difficult situation for supporters of the bill. Do they vote for the long-awaited piece of legislation that aims to finally give female priests the chance for promotion they deserve in England? Or do they flush it, on the basis that it would “enshrine discrimination in law”? The Archdeacon of Hackney, Rachel Treweek, described the problem to The Guardian:

It would be very easy to say, ‘Oh, let’s all just vote in favour and get this through.’… I want to get it right now. I don’t want to get something in legislation which means we’re having to come back to this.

In the end, they took a third option – the three houses voted to postpone the bill until a “special” Synod in November. The purpose of this was to ramp up pressure on the House of Bishops – led by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams – to get rid of the offending clause.

via David Walker

Williams has conceded that the amendment is “a corner into which the Church has backed itself and out of which we are trying to get”, but also implied that senior Bishops might not be able to come up with a better legislative compromise. It seems that the supporters in the house of Clergy and house of Laity will have to fight hard to get the bishops thinking of solutions. “Never in my experience has the church been so out of step with the good news and of the people of this country,” laments Celia Thomson, Canon Pastor of Gloucester cathedral.

In reality, this delay of the bill was the best possible result for female clergy, but that’s not the key issue here: it’s that the people who still believe in theologically-sanctioned sexism are being taken seriously, even pandered to, and thus impede actual progress. Evangelicals have threatened to leave the Church if the legislation passes; coincidentally, this mirrors the threat of the Anglican Church as a whole to break with the UK as the state religion if gay marriage law passes.

On a world scale, 18 provinces of the Church of England have no legal bars to ordaining female bishops, with female bishops serving in 5; so far the world has not ended, and God has not struck them down as heathens. How can we say the Church of England supports female bishops in Cuba if it does not support them in England? It’s time the home of Anglicanism caught up with the rest of the world, before it gets any more embarrassing.

I like raspberry lip balm and can't speak French. I also enjoy music, writing and trawling the internet when I should be doing something useful. Aspiring writer and expert music junkie.

Sawyer has written 6 articles for us.

8 Comments

  1. This seems like one of those things that will eventually happen (the question is just when, & it could be a long time yet). A family friend who is a vicar said that then she was ordained, two thirds of the others being ordained were female. Obviously that’s just anecdotal evidence, but looking it up it seems that it’s virtually 50/50 now in terms of male/female ordinations each year, so with time it seems like it really should happen… (Though this article made me sad/angry: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/even-outstanding-women-struggle-to-rise-in-the-cofe-7440944.html.)

    Anyway, great to see more UK/English stuff on AS!

  2. I actually know Canon Celia from my days as a babygay in the Youth Choir at Gloucester Cathedral. She’s such a lovely, intelligent, sensitive woman but not naturally transgressive. Kudos to her for standing up for what she believes in and not letting the stupid men in charge shut her up.
    Incidentally, I once watched an episode of Never Mind the Buzzcocks with her, which was a uniquely awkward experience for all involved!

    On another note, in my experience the Church of England is stuffed full of gay people. I’m not religious myself, but there were gay (though usually closeted) clergy and openly gay people in the choirs and congregation. On a local level nobody bats an eyelid. But those at the top of the Church of England are not just out of step with the wider public, but with their own community.

  3. Yes it does seem bizarre that ‘not deciding’ was the best outcome. Increasingly the outspoken leadership of the C of E seems out of step with the churches on the ground. It seems like the policy to avoid controversy is to move at a far slower rate than anyone else.
    Giles Fraser wrote some interesting pieces in the Guardian this week in response to the women bishops debate but his article from yesterday sums up my views quite nicely:
    “The parish church is typically a more inclusive place than the church’s leadership understand. Here there is neither rich nor poor, black nor white, gay nor straight. The archbishops are out of touch.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2012/jul/13/inclusive-church-gospel-imperative

  4. The Church needs to get over 1500 years of culture ie the patriarchy calling the shots and actually look at what the Bible not the institute disguised as ‘tradition’ is saying.

  5. I would like to say that I just got Jailbreak the Patriarchy, which made this article much less depressing and frequently hilarious. Here are some choice selections:

    “A man should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a man to teach or to have authority over a woman; he must be silent –1 Timothy 2.11-12”

    “male priestesses”

    “…Goddess has not struck them down as heathens.”

    Also may I just say that the state of male clergy in the Church of England is shameful. Curse the matriarchy!

  6. I’m beginning to think you’ve taken it as a personal challenge to work me in to these articles.

    It sucks to consider that the Anglican church is consistently trying to enforce inequality across the board with threats. It reeks of immaturity, “Do what we want or we’re taking our toys and going home.”
    Having said that, the Catholic Church is still way behind them. The only way a woman can be involved in the Church is as a nun, we can’t even have female priests (as an athiest I say we only in the context of coming from a catholic background). Something to do with ‘priests acting in the place of Christ’ which obviously only a man can do, cause all these child abuse scandals lately are SO Christ-like.

Contribute to the conversation...

You must be logged in to post a comment.