New York Works for GENDA and Gender Identity Workplace Protection

Many people have at least a passing familiarity with ENDA, the legislation which would protect Americans from workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and, in the inclusive version of the bill, gender identity. The gender-identity-inclusive version of ENDA has proved apparently nearly impossible to pass at the federal level; although it’s been at different levels in Congress since 1994, there’s still no word on when the inclusive bill might be a reality.


There are also moves being made for ENDA protections on the state level, however, and the question of how to secure protections for gender expression and identity is still present for local activists and legislators. In New York state, the discussion is about GENDA, which would specifically protect trans* individuals from workplace discrimination based upon their gender identity. The Empire State Pride Agenda seems as if it will specifically focus on GENDA, and has hired a “high-profile… lobbying and PR team” to do so. There have been divisions within the activist community regarding the organization’s expenditure of effort and resources on marriage equality as opposed to issues like trans rights, and the team that Empire State Pride has hired is in fact the same one that helped secure marriage equality for NY in 2011.

There have been some major changes in both Empire State Pride Agenda and the New York gay activist community since marriage equality was won in New York; Empire State’s executive director, Ross Levi, was fired, although the circumstances of his leaving are unclear. GENDA has already been attempted and failed in New York several times before, and it doesn’t necessarily have the level of support from the gay community that an issue like gay marriage did in 2011. Melissa Sklarz, leader of the Stonewall Democratic Community, describes the process of trying to push GENDA as advocating for a “mostly faceless invisible community.” It’s an ambitious plan for what’s already been difficult legislation to pass; Republicans are already criticizing it with the same “bathroom bill” language they’ve used in the past. If the team that made marriage equality a reality in New York can make progress on an issue that’s been stalled in Congress since 1994, however, then this could be a hugely instructional campaign for other groups that care about trans rights and protections. New York’s progress with marriage equality has already impacted the momentum of movements in other states; we can only hope that their work with trans* rights will have a chance to do the same.

Before you go! Did you like what you just read? We keep Autostraddle majority free-to-read, but it isn't free to create! And yet most readers don't support this indie queer site. Will you be one of the people who do? A+ membership starts at just $4/month or $30/year and they literally keep us from closing. Will you join? Cancel anytime.

Join A+


Originally from Boston, MA, Rachel now lives in the Midwest. Topics dear to her heart include bisexuality, The X-Files and tacos. Her favorite Ciara video is probably "Ride," but if you're only going to watch one, she recommends "Like A Boy." You can follow her on twitter and instagram.

Rachel has written 1142 articles for us.


  1. “advocating for a ‘mostly faceless invisible community.'” <- this is the biggest hurdle for GENDA I think. without more visibility, those opposed to the bill won't change their minds, and even many of those who would support it won't be the passionate advocates needed to get more support.

    • Who’d be visible while knowing their boss could quite legally fire them for it? One role for allies here is to stand in as placeholders for the many people who don’t dare risk everything.

Contribute to the conversation...

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated by the guidelines laid out in our comment policy. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation and thanks for stopping by!