Ugh, More Roy Moore
+ Roy Moore, Alabama Chief Justice and consistently unlikable person, is telling Alabama judges they can’t issue marriage licenses to gay couples. He claims that he has the right to “take affirmative and appropriate action to correct or alleviate any condition or situation adversely affecting the administration of justice within the state.”
Roy Moore
This isn’t new territory for Moore; he did the same thing in March of last year, when Alabama was a legal battleground for same-sex marriage before the landmark SCOTUS ruling that would occur later in the year. Given that the SCOTUS ruling did occur, it seems very bold for Roy Moore to try the exact same move; his argument, it seems is that the SCOTUS ruling should only apply to the states that were directly involved in the plaintiffs’ suit.
Alabama has been, it seems, a bit hectic today as all this shakes out; probate judges were warned that they could be held in contempt of court if they followed Moore’s orders, since they contradict laws on the books. As of earlier today, Mobile County had stopped issuing all marriage licenses to stay “neutral” on the issue. The ACLU has issued a statement reminding everyone that the SCOTUS decision does actually apply to all Alabama counties, especially after a federal court order from the summer that district judge Callie Granade delivered for essentially just this reason.
Roy Moore will almost certainly not be vindicated in the long run, but it seems very possible that he could make life difficult and frustrating for Alabama’s same-sex couples in the meantime, following the example of Kim Davis.
Police/Violence
+ County district attorney Robert James is recommending that a criminal grand jury indict the Georgia police officer who killed Anthony Hill, a mentally ill veteran of Afghanistan.
+ Brian Encinia, the Texas state trooper who pulled over and arrested Sandra Bland before she died in police custody, has been indicted on a charge of perjury regarding his statements about Bland’s arrest, which the prosecutor didn’t feel were “truthful.”
+ Katie Baker at Buzzfeed has reporting on a woman who was raped by an on-duty police officer, and everything the department did to try to cover it up.
They asked Lindsay about her sexual history: Had she ever had HPV? They deposed her friends: What had Lindsay been wearing the night Sanchez pulled her over? They even went as far as to hire a gynecology medical expert witness to testify that Lindsay’s vagina had not shown significant signs of trauma. In the meantime, Lindsay’s life was put on hold for half a decade, she said, because the process was so retraumatizing.
Law & Order
+ A Chinese court has taken the country’s first same-sex marriage case, a man who is suing a civil affairs bureau for his right to marry.
Sun Wenlin, 26, told Reuters a court in Changsha, the capital of Hunan province, had accepted his lawsuit on Tuesday. “I think from a legal point of view, we should be successful,” Sun said. “Our marriage law says there is the freedom to marry and gender equality. These words can be applied to same-sex marriage.” Sun said he had filed the lawsuit in December because he wanted to form a family unit with his 36-year-old partner.
+ Gay Star News has a rundown on the US states that still ban discussion of homosexuality in school.
[Law student Ryan Matthews] called No Promo Homo laws ‘the most discriminatory laws you have never heard of. Hidden in education laws, they restrict the promotion of homosexuality in public school classrooms by prohibiting the teaching of homosexuality or requiring its condemnation,’ he wrote. Matthews said that it worried him that many of his fellow law students couldn’t believe that laws like these were even followed in 2015 when some lawmakers were even trying to strengthen them. ‘These laws are not outdated; indeed they have only been around since the 1980s,’ Matthews wrote.
+ In a proposed bill that is something of a zinger aimed at lawmakers in bed with lobbyists, Missouri is proposing a bill that would require lawmakers to disclose any lobbyists they have sex with. Not meant to be taken particularly seriously, the proposed bill is nonetheless a sick burn on lawmakers who are dining out and living large on lobbyists’ dimes.
+ Ten women have charged Bill Gothard, founder of religious institute Institute of Basic Life Principles, with “sexual abuse, harassment and cover-up.” The Duggars have famously been staunch proponents of IBLP’s homeschool curriculum.
Bill Gothard
+ A private boarding school in Rhode Island is being investigated as over 40 former students claim to have been victims of sexual abuse there, many saying that they reported their abuse to administration only to be disbelieved. Several of the alleged perpetrators have since passed away, but some victims are asking for the resignation of the current headmaster, saying “Eric Peterson has been covering this up since 2004.”
+ Vermont senator Norm McAllister was arrested in May for sexual assault; he plead not guilty, and while he was stripped of his committee assignments he refused to resign. Now, in a Vermont first, the chamber has voted to suspend him.
+ A series of raids are reportedly set to begin, aimed at deporting families and especially targeting children who arrived in the US in the last two years. The plan was first reported on Christmas Eve, and could begin anytime in the next few weeks. “The raids would target children who arrived with a family member—referred to as “family units” in technical lingo—“wherever they can be found,” and sent for immediate deportation, The Washington Post reported.” Immigrant rights groups and Democratic presidential candidates have all expressed outrage.
+ President Obama has released a series of executive actions aimed at reducing gun violence, which update the efficacy of background checks, loop in local law enforcement if unauthorized people attempt to buy guns, add new investigators and agents to enforce gun laws, and proposed increased funding for mental health care.
All reporting on Roy Moore from this point on should lead of with “Ugh, More Roy Moore”. Indeed.
I am soooo bored of individual people who think they are above the law of the Supreme Court when it comes to marriage laws.
You know what would be less boring? A judge who refused to give a mandatory long sentence to a nonviolent drug offender. A state official who tried to lift mandatory wait times on access to abortion. A county clerk who…well, I have no idea what county clerks do other than issue marriage licenses, but one who did something good and illegal, in the name of what’s right or their own god’s law. If going against the law is something people in power can do because god tells them to, why isn’t anyone doing anything on the social justice side? Why is it always the religious right? They break the rules all the time. Let’s break them too!
Probably because people on our side are intelligent and rational enough to understand the legal process and refuse to waste taxpayer money like this buffoon :/
GOOD FOR HIIM>I of the gaagenda
Are we sure that Moore is a lawyer? Maybe we need to check that with the University of Alabama? Because I think knowing how judicial precedent and jurisprudence works should be basic knowledge for a lawyer, or even for a first-year law student.
BTW, this motherfucker was kicked out of the Alabama Supreme Court by the COJ on 2003(“Chief Justice Moore has violated the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics”), how the hell was he elected for the same freaking position once again?
It was such a glorious moment down here in Bama when they removed him and his obnoxious rock back in 2003. Unfortunately, some people here just vote straight party tickets and do not actually look at candidates (of course, the argument could be made–and probably should have been made– that he should not have been qualified to run again for that position).
Maybe we should go a little deeper. Are we sure that SC Justices should be elected officials? I mean, just considering how every political campaign works, kinda like a little silly popularity contest.
Oh I absolutely agree! And down here in Bama, it is horrendous!! The fact that he was even allowed to run again for a position he was previously removed from (for not followed a federal court order) showed how messed up elections for State SC positions really are. Of course, the rest of our state governing body is not much better (Speaker of House under indictment for 23 ethics violations, etc), so I dont know how appointments would go either.
Jeez, 23 indictments? Was Mike Hubbard participating in some weird contest? If he was, he won, hands down.
it is always cringe-worthy when AS writes about my home state, because it’s always something cringe-worthy going on there.
There’s been speculation that Moore issued this order (again) to take away the spotlight from his son’s indictment on drug charges. His son is also a complete d-bag, by the way.
Yeah Roy Moore shows one of the many reasons I’m glad I moved away. Born and raised in Alabama but will never understand some of the crap that continually goes on there.
Thankfully some counties plan on ignoring him because they’re tired of his hissy fits.
All of a sudden, one day after his son is indicted, he “happens” to issue the “order”….yeah, not a coincidence at all. Loving the Probate Judge for Montgomery County, Steven Reed….he called Moore out for his antics.
As a proud-but-eternally-frustrated-Alabamian, one aspect of marriage rights in Alabama that I feel like is important to point out but is often not (at least in non-local news outlets) is that multiple counties in Alabama have either not been issuing marriage licences to same-sex couples or not issuing licenses to any couples since March when Roy Moore first started making statements. So, this has been a *thing* for a while.
Also, for the more conspiracy inclined, this week is also the week that the latest news regarding Mr. Moore’s son’s drug charges are to come down….
A little good news: 113 attorneys (including from the Transgender Law Center and Lambda Legal) contributed their stories about getting abortions to an amicus brief to the supreme court. Although the fundamental argument is that access to abortion is necessary for women’s equal participation in the Nation and that sort of says ‘people deserve abortion access so they can do what men let each other do,” it’s still important and inspiring that with just 2-3 weeks notice, these people put their professional identities on the line for other abortion-needing people who may or may not take up historically male roles in the patriarchy when they get a safe and available abortion: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2016/01/amicus_brief_by_113_female_attorneys_supports_abortion.html
Wow! Thanks for sharing!