Dutch Filmmakers Face the First Backlash Against Foreigners from Russia’s Anti-Gay Law

Despite the decriminalization of homosexuality in Russia in 1993, the past few weeks have seen a rush of anti-gay legislation, including the new ban on the adopting of children by any same sex couples. This weekend, four Dutch immigrants became the first people found in contempt of the anti-gay propaganda law, and were arrested. They were released Sunday without being charged.

Cara introduced the specifics of this bill in her article last month, explaining the fines and penalties for citizens who engage in the “dissemination of information aimed at developing in minors non-traditional sexual facilities.” This includes any printed propaganda, use of the media and internet to spread pro-gay messages, speaking about homosexuality in the presence of children and the assembly of LGBT groups, protests or rallies. Monetary fines range from 4,000 rubles for individuals up to 1 million rubles for organizations. Foreigners can face deportation, organization can see temporary closure, and some individuals can serve jail time.

According to a report from BBC, the four Dutch citizens were filming a documentary about gay rights in Murmansk when police burst in during an interview, detained the film crew, and questioned them for several hours. The police later reviewed their footage. One of the documentary participants turned out to be 17 years old, though the Dutch lawyer countered that the participant told the film crew he was 18 before they included them in filiming. One member of the Dutch group, Kris van der Veen, wrote on his twitter account that since their release, no further action has been taken against them. It is now assumed there won’t be a full case brought against them. (Van der Veen is the head of LGBT-Groningen, a group that campaigns for gay rights). Each of the four were fined 3,000 rubles, ($93), and cited for violating their visas which stated they were visiting the area to learn local culture.

As the homophobic legislation in Russia escalates, there seems to be little mainstream news coverage or reaction to these harsh political changes, despite the international attention you would assume Russia would receive as Russia is readying to host the 2014 Winter Olympic games. In a New York Times op/ed piece last weekend, Harvey Fierstein, an actor and playwright, voiced his frustrations about the situation in Russia, calling out the world’s silence and questioning Putin’s political motives. Fierstein concludes that “Mr. Putin’s campaign against lesbian, gay and bisexual people is one of distraction” from other political failings. He also challenges the world leaders to speak out against these practices that are breeding hate and violence.

As mentioned above, at least two new bills regarding LGBT rights have passed since the anti-gay propaganda bill in June. On July 3rd, Putin signed the ban on adoptions by same sex couples, both domestic and foreign, which had been brewing for some time. Single parents who lived in same sex permitting areas are included in this ban. The Huffington Post quoted the Kremlin as saying “the measure is aimed at guaranteeing a harmonious and full upbringing for children in adoptive families.” Just a few days earlier, Putin extended the previous anti-propaganda bill to include foreign tourists. This new provision is especially worrisome in light of the Olympics – and whether any LGBT athletes could be subjected to consequences of this law, which includes up to 15 days of jail time, for speaking publicly about their sexual orientation.

The time is ripe for international pressure to be put on Russia, but any real action is yet to be seen. The International Olympic Community and Human Rights Watch have already released statements vowing to stand by any LGBT athletes, but the protection of just one group isn’t a good meter for change. While stories of questioned foreigners and fears about traveling swirl on smaller news outlets, the internal violence continues without much coverage, and Russia’s silenced LGBT community waits for collective support.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!


Jamie has written 7 articles for us.



    Also she just said v. smart things about Russia and I can only think OMG JAMIE HI JAMIE. This is my shortcoming, not hers.

  2. This really sucks. I basically live for Olympic figure skating and I’m going to feel very torn about my decision to watch it. I get the feeling that if this were about race, other countries would be making a much bigger deal about it and would be more seriously considering a boycott.

  3. Tbh, I almost hope they arrest all foreigner who go to Russia to get famous for saving the gays. I’m so tired of especially straight celebs / public figures doing this – and it’s what made Putin pass the law in the first place. Nobody cares how this will affect Russians, although they have not been silent on this issue – their voices are silenced by all the western tourists concerned about whether they’ll still be able to take an expensive holiday, but Russians are not silent passive victims.

    I guess this proves that the answer is YES, nothing seriously bad will happen to you if you’re a tourist, especially nothing will happen to athletes? Do you think that if this were a group of Russian queer film-makers they would have gotten away without the police finding some excuse to rough then up at least a bit? because I don’t.

    • also now I am cranky and want to read or write or I dunno something titled, A Brief History of Americans’ Many Failed Attempts to Save the Eastern European Gays in Order to Maintain the Illusion that the US Is a Safe Haven of Freedom and Justice, Unlike All Those Repressive Communist Countries

      because y’know that is what is happening, the main reason this is in the news is because it’s happening in Russia – and the US as a matter of official foreign policy has supported progressive legislation / measure etc it would never support at home in Eastern Europe for a very long time, even during the Bush administration – because in backward countries the US has to be made to stand for liberty etc just like it did during the Cold War, never mind that a good chunk of actual Americans don’t stand by those values

Comments are closed.