Google Cares More About Your Gay Family Than America Does, Has Money For You

So have you heard the many exotic myths surrounding the Google offices and the experience of working for them? The five different floors of the cafeteria, all serving gourmet cuisine which you can have delivered to your office by a trained monkey? The electromagnetic levitation moonboots you are provided with to transport you to the meetings which have imported Italian espresso instead of coffee? The free skydiving? Well anyways,  add one more item to the list of Reasons Why Google Is the Perfect Employer: they’re going to start compensating gay and lesbian employees for the extra taxes they pay because they can’t legally marry their partners. (@nytimes)

According to Laszlo Bock, vice president of HR for Google, a gay employee personally pointed out the discrepancy in experience between GLBT and straight employees – employees with domestic partners will pay an average of $1,069 more per year than their straight married counterparts. (Boy howdy would it be nice if a court ruling overturned the law that prohibits gay people from marrying and thus getting equal tax treatment! Just saying!) And according to Google, they just kind of thought about it, and… decided this was unfair and someone should fix it. What a novel idea! So starting today, Google will compensate gay and lesbian employees the amount of money that the law is denying them in benefits, retroactively to Jan. 1 of this year.

Aside from being objectively awesome in and of itself, this story highlights a few things.

First of all, it gets down to what is for a lot of us the real experience of being queer in the US – although social issues and the general perception of our community in the mainstream media are certainly important, for many the real day-to-day reality of being part of a marginalized group is economic. We make less money. We’re hired for fewer jobs. We’re often the first to be fired or laid off from the jobs we do get. And then we’re forced to pay higher taxes because of the way our government regulates our families. The moral and ethical ramifications of discrimination are clear, but speaking as professional writers and journalists who still eat like college freshmen because it’s all we can afford, we’d almost be willing to put up with the social degradation and feeling of being second-class if we could at least make enough money to feed our rent. Google’s move addresses a real need of the queer community – to be treated as a first-class citizen by their employers, and have someone take the wage gap seriously.

And speaking of taking things seriously, let’s look at the big picture here. There are about 700 gay or lesbian employees at Google according to the New York Times – in a literal sense, they’re the only one who’s going to be impacted by this policy. Queer women working as Walgreens cashiers in Michigan won’t directly benefit. Nor will the lesbians who are still out of work, as addressed in Curve Magazine’s The Silent Majority: Lesbians and Poverty, in which Victoria A. Brownworth writes:

The recession has meant more people are living on the edge financially and for women, that means poverty looms. For lesbians who are already marginalized by society, that edge is exceedingly sharp and disallows for anything to go wrong. Lesbians often have few support systems, or, like Nelson, their supports aren’t a buffer because those people too are experiencing the same dire circumstances.

But I would say the example that Google is setting here is enormously important in a time and place when “change” is simultaneously the buzzword of the decade and the biggest political boogeyman of the year.

It’s maybe put best by the HRC, actually:

Google “has decided it’s in their best interest to treat employees with same-sex partners fairly,” said Daryl Herrschaft, who oversees the Workplace Project of the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, “and that includes picking up the slack when federal law doesn’t recognize the diversity of today’s work force.”

Do you see what happened here? It was so mindblowing to me I almost couldn’t process it. Google looked at the situation, decided it was unfair, and just up and did something about it. In the middle of a seemingly interminable DADT repeal, in the middle of a series of endless incremental decisions to maybe sort of kind of one day decide on the constitutionality of DOMA, in the middle of a dozen petty legal battles across a dozen states to make sure queers can’t marry or adopt or work or use the bathroom they need to, someone just realized something was wrong, and since it was in their power to fix it, they did. It’s such a simple, beautiful thing it brings tears to your eyes. Google’s example is an incredible one, and one that we should all drop to our knees and pray that others will follow: they used their money and social capital to help a group that didn’t have the power to help itself, they chose to correct a wrong that the government is too clumsy and backwards to do for itself.

And most important of all, they did it because they knew it was “in their best interest to treat employees with same-sex partners fairly.” That’s what will end up being the key to all of this, to the future that’s to bright we’ll all need sunglasses: making the people in charge realize that they should give us equal rights not just because it’s fair or because we deserve them, but because it’s best of all of us; the best thing for America is for all of its citizens to be treated like full citizens, even the gay ones. The health and benefits department of the consulting firm Mercer has said that “It could have a ripple effect, prompting other employers, and particularly employers in the same industry, to take a look at their own benefits package and see whether it would be appropriate to extend those benefits;” I think we should all be crossing our fingers that they’re right.

[It’s possible also that Google is Big Brother and possibly harvesting our thoughts for future world takeover. But maybe that’s the only way to get our freakin’ money.]

Before you go! It takes funding to keep this publication by and for queer women and trans people of all genders running every day. And A+ members keep the majority of our site free for everyone. Still, 99.9% of our readers are not members. A+ membership starts at just $4/month. If you're able to, will you join A+ and keep Autostraddle here and working for everyone?
Related:

Originally from Boston, MA, Rachel now lives in the Midwest. Topics dear to her heart include bisexuality, The X-Files and tacos. Her favorite Ciara video is probably "Ride," but if you're only going to watch one, she recommends "Like A Boy." You can follow her on twitter and instagram.

Rachel has written 1142 articles for us.

19 Comments

  1. this is really cool and all, but i get nervous whenever companies adopting fair practices by choice is presented as a solution to problems that need to be addressed at a higher level. the socialist in me (and it’s substantial) doesn’t trust corps to be any sort of agents of social change, and worries that this model takes away impetus for change to happen in the places it needs to, where it is not presented as a choice. that said, it’s still awesome of google.

    • I don’t think it’s being presented as a solution per se – perhaps more like a temporary thing until the government stops acting like a bunch of idiots. Or a company taking a stand on a social justice issue, which is something companies like Google and MS, for all their evilness, do all the time.

    • Well, the tax breaks are only for legally married couples, so I’m guessing if they have LGBTQ employees that have civil unions or domestic partnerships, those couples will be able to file something with Google to get the extra cash. Since single people, of any orientation, don’t get those tax breaks, Google won’t have to find out if a (future) employee is gay unless they have a CU/DP and volunteer the info. Obvs I don’t work for Google, so this is speculation.

      • Oh, I see, so legally married folk(including LGBTQ) shouldn’t get the extra cash. I can’t hlep but think people might take advantage of it though. (if that’s even possible)

        • I think legally married LGBTQ folk will qualify too, since the tax break is a federal one, and no same-sex marriages are recognized federally.
          But otherwise, I think Elizabeth is prob right (and I don’t work for Google either, so…grain of salt) – the extra cash is only to compensate Google employees who put their partner on their insurance plan and wind up paying more in taxes since partner benefits aren’t tax-deductible like (opposite-sex) spousal benefits are.

    • D:

      i want to live in the magical land of california. my friend in sf told me they served them beers after lunch, and let them sit on beach balls, and danced at 2pm every day.

      i can really get behind the idea of what google’s doing, because it’s just “the right thing to do”. i just hope that it doesn’t end up being that some douchebags start pretending to be gay because they want more money, or that google decides in 3 years that this was only temporary/a test to see what would happen.

  2. Google should pay extra for all the gays so they can seek help to understand that they are not the norm. And by not being the norm, they attract the bad offerings of the rest of society that thinks of themselves as the norm. There is no right to marriage in the US confered on anyone. If these gay partners are financially disadvantaged by the tax laws, then, the normal majority has decided against their idea of marriage. To think otherwise opens the door to each person being a minority of somme kind for some reason as we are all unique. The civil rights laws do nothing for the average citizen. His rights are reduced by these laws. If all the hardship you ever endure is the loss of $1050 a year between two of you, you are doing good. If you have to endure the sneers and lears of normal folk, that is your fate. I would hire one of you but would have to fire you when you start that idiotic protesting and parade mode you fall into in SF. All pay is based on worth of the individual to the company in the society in which the company is operating. Sorry, a real prissy fag or bull dike is just as odd and disengaging as an serial killer to most people outside SF. I hate it for yah, but you do not rate the extra pay. If google is on a campaigne to rid the world of injustice, google will spend out over night.
    First, google needs to explain what the July 6, 2010 logo above the search form is all about. Looks like a SF fag to me.

Contribute to the conversation...

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated by the guidelines laid out in our comment policy. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation and thanks for stopping by!