Extra! Extra!: Why We Can’t Look Away from HB 1217 and Other Legislative Attacks Targeting Trans Youth

This week’s Extra! Extra! looks at the wave of anti-trans legislation making its way around state houses, new research findings that treating people humanely is (in fact) good policy, the state of technology and a whole host of international news.

LGBTQ+ News

Political Dispute Over Transgender Rights Focuses On Youth Sports

The New Wave of Anti-Trans Legislation Sure Looks a Lot Like Eugenics

Anti-LGBTQ+ orgs are drafting anti-trans bills for policymakers with an online form

Himani: South Dakota is poised to become the second state (after Idaho) to bar trans youth from athletics. HB 1217 passed in the state legislature and is awaiting signature from Governor Kristi Noem, who already said on Twitter that she will sign it. In response, over 500 student athletes have asked the NCAA to not host athletic events in South Dakota.

One of the arguments against HB 1217 that has circulated is that it’ll hurt the state’s economy as organizations boycott the state in solidarity with the trans community. It’s sad, though unsurprising, that economic rather than humane considerations are what can tip the balance in these situations. And yet South Dakota Republicans and Noem are plowing forward anyway, which is particularly rich given that this is the same state that has had one of the worst outbreaks of COVID-19 because the governor refused to enforce a mask mandate, much less close the state due to… economic considerations and concerns about individual liberty.

As always, the slew of anti-trans legislation is about sending a clear signal about who is and is not welcome in society, about whose life does and does not carry value, about who can and cannot access basic human rights. Even as many acknowledge that the actual question of trans girls playing in sports hasn’t even come up in the states that are considering anti-trans legislation (because of how small the population is in the first place), the point is the message it sends to the entire trans community about the place they are being afforded in society. The whole thing is incredibly shameful from start to finish.

Rachel: This is part of a pattern trans organizers and activists have pointed out for years – when any step forward is made in terms of access, power or visibility for trans people, we’ll also see a vicious backlash in response to it, both in terms of interpersonal violence against trans people and in terms of policy. These onslaughts of anti-trans legislation, aimed often at young trans people and using language that implies predation and threats to cis kids, will continue — and I’m concerned that in a post-Trump era and when there are so many overwhelming news stories on our minds with the pandemic, these attempts to harm trans kids won’t get the pushback they should.

Ghana’s LGBTQ Community is Under Siege – And Politicians Are Leading the Attacks

Himani: Reading this incredibly disheartening news out of Ghana, it’s hard not to see parallels to what is happening with anti-trans legislation in the U.S. that we discussed above. Again, the point is about sending a message to the LGBTQ+ community in Ghana, letting them know that they are not welcome. The context may be different, the actions may be different, the consequences for individuals directly involved may be different. But in terms of how all this affects the community as a whole — I don’t mean to diminish either situation when I say that it feels like they both result in a similar, unsettling sense of unwantedness and displacement.

COVID-19 Update

What’s in Congress’s $1.9 trillion covid bill: Checks, unemployment insurance and more

Himani: After a lot of drama, the COVID relief bill has finally passed in Congress and been signed by Biden. This article is a helpful explainer of what made the final cut of the stimulus package.

How Chile built one of the world’s most successful vaccination campaigns

Himani: This was a really interesting article, particularly against the backdrop of many lower income countries struggling to access COVID vaccines and also the backdrop of Chile’s constitutional referendum. This is one of those situations where I don’t have a lot of insight to offer, but I think this is an important and valuable read.

Brazil’s Covid outbreak is global threat that opens door to lethal variants – scientist

Himani: As the global vaccine roll out continues on its lopsided path, this is honestly one of my greatest concerns. I’m known for catastrophizing situations, but… the scientific community has been right so far about the consequences of allowing COVID to spread rampantly. I hope, for all of our sakes, that I’m wrong.

Those fever scanners that everyone is using to fight covid can be wildly inaccurate, researchers find

When Evidence Finally Catches Up With What We Knew Was the Right Thing To Do All Along

Science-Based Policy Means Decriminalizing Sex Work, Say Hundreds of Researchers

California Program Giving $500 No-Strings-Attached Stipends Pays Off, Study Finds

Rachel: I love the header Himani chose for this section, and also these two stories could easily be grouped under the heading ‘policy directions that won’t be invested in no matter how much science supports them, because despite critics’ claims, the opposition to them has always been based in moral panic, not lack of information or evidence.” There’s never been any evidence-based reason to criminalize sex work, and as several folks on social media have noted wryly, there’s a new study that proves definitively that variations on UBI are hugely effective every year or so. If concerns about evidence were really the roadblock here, these things would be huge gamechangers! But unfortunately until we do something to really uproot our deeply held cultural (and carceral) beliefs that sex work is morally impure and should be punished and that poverty is the result of moral failing and should also be punished, our policy is going to continue to reflect those values.

Himani: Honestly, reading about the results from the Stockton study has been incredibly frustrating. As Rachel said, the underlying beliefs about how people will behave when they’re given “free money” are grounded in moral assumptions rather than any kind of actual reality. And so to see it “confirmed” that oh, I guess people do spend money on food and bills or having a little bit of money on hand does make it possible for people to work more or start new businesses — these really feel like no brainers to me. But what’s even more frustrating is that there actually has been a fairly substantial body of research on UBI in other countries for years now. As Rachel observes, these new findings aren’t going to result in policy change because, as we know from all the challenges with combating misinformation and conspiracy theories, no amount of “reasoning” will change deeply held beliefs.

The Work on the Ground: A Mix of Progress and Setbacks

Amid massive security presence, Minneapolis is turning to grassroots to keep the peace

Rachel: It’s an intense and challenging time for Minneapolis right now — the city is living through the trial of the police officer who killed George Floyd, likely to stretch on for months — the increased police presence and state discourse is broadly re-traumatizing a community just as it also undergoes a trauma anniversary of the pandemic. There’s a lot of distrust and anxiety, as is pretty reasonable — I really recommend this community roundtable from the local Sahan Journal, which is dedicating its coverage during the trial to the community, not the courtroom. A sentiment many of these folks echo (and which I tend to share): “The way the city is preparing right now as if they already know the verdict is scaring a lot of people. I’ve talked to a lot of my friends. A lot of people in my neighborhood that I meet mentioned, Hey, you know, we saw the barbed fences. You know, the wires, all the blockades. They’re scared because they’re like, Hey, does the city know something we don’t? Does the city believe he’s not going to be convicted?

The MN Reformer piece linked above talks about the ways MN is trying to address those trust issues, including “paid partnerships with “trusted messengers” with a large social media presence to share “city-generated and approved messages” and dispel misinformation” and “cultural radio programs — on KMOJ, WIXK, KALY and La Raza, which reach the African American/Black, Hmong, Somali and Latino/a/x communities” and “using ‘trusted community messengers’ to translate trial-related information.” It’s not that those are bad ideas, but it does sort of reify the idea that the state’s main concern here isn’t justice, but managing the reaction of the population — which both begs the question of what the outcome will be, if they’re assuming a negative reaction, and the question of why these resources can’t be mobilized in other situations that benefit the community, not the state — why is the trusted messenger campaign being mobilized around the trial, but not COVID testing availability and locations, vaccine misinformation or elections?

Also notable, and outlined in the article, is that while “Minneapolis Police Chief Medaria Arradondo said during the first one last week that the city has been planning its response for eight months, and he has been talking to people around the city for several months,” but “a spokesperson for a coalition of 17 activist and community groups said Thursday they haven’t heard from city officials at all” — presumably because that kind of dialogue would put the city in the position of having to answer questions about accountability and systemic change they aren’t prepared to answer. It feels tense and draining to live here right now, and I imagine 100x more so for many residents of Mpls who were impacted by last summer’s state violence more than I was, and feels very much like the city learned to be afraid of its people, but not that the lesson from that is that they have to actually listen to us.

The USA Needs a Reckoning. Does “Truth and Reconciliation” Actually Work?

Himani: I found this to be a fascinating read. The main takeaway seems to be this:

“If there’s a productive way forward for TRCs, it’s probably simply as ‘truth commissions.’ Facts can serve as building blocks for awareness, evidence in criminal trials, or talking points in debates about reparations. We can’t know when, if ever, the citizens of Durham or Evanston or Asheville, North Carolina, or Providence, Rhode Island, will undergo the kind of transformation that will remake their communities. But at least they’ll have a better understanding of how the past shapes their present.”

Personally, I think being honest about what happened is far more important than the “reconciliation” part. Or, as Breq put it in Ann Leckie’s Ancillary Sword, “For my part, I find forgiveness overrated.” The article covers this as well, but there seems something so incredibly Western and American to me about this emphasis on forgiveness, and it often comes at the expense of paying proper due to those who have been harmed. It’s also incredibly lopsided: the same group of people always gets to take and take and take and demand the most punitive forms of “justice” for the smallest infractions while another group — also always the same — is expected to forgive even in the face of extreme brutality.

A Texas city had a bold new climate plan – until a gas company got involved

Himani: All I can say to this is — of course they did.

Chicago hunger strike against recycling plant grows: ‘We’re starving ourselves to save people’s lives

Extremism, Hate Crimes and Technology

US far-right extremists making millions via social media and cryptocurrency

The most engaging political news on Facebook? Far-right misinformation.

How Facebook got addicted to spreading misinformation

Himani: There’s something incredibly disheartening to me that this is the direction of the latest, most cutting-edge technology advancements. I can’t say I’m entirely surprised: as Wan Shi Tong says in Avatar: The Last Airbender, “Humans only bother learning things to get the edge on other humans.” (Side note: Apparently my brain is in sci fi/fantasy media today.) But it’s disheartening nonetheless.

Reports of Anti-Asian hate crimes rose nearly 150% in major U.S. cities last year

Foreign Policy and International News

Joe Biden Inherited the Forever War. Will He Give it Away?

Himani: Two weeks ago, Biden authorized an airstrike in Syria and a lot of Democratic politicians were unhappy about it. Last week, he purportedly pulled back on a second airstrike after civilians were spotted in the area the U.S. was planning to target. After 9/11, politicians across the spectrum were all too eager to start war in Afghanistan, and no one has seemed to figure a way out of it. Last year, Trump promised fully withdrawing troops on by May 1 of this year and the Biden administration is debating how to proceed. From what I can tell, there are real drawbacks of exiting at this point, which isn’t to say I’m a proponent of continuing the war. It’s truly an impossible situation. What I struggled to find as I was looking for more information and perspectives on this was perspectives from Afghani people, either living in Afghanistan or abroad, on what the U.S.’s role has been and should be. If anyone reads anything along those lines, please drop that in the comments and I will greatly appreciate it.

The Budapest-Warsaw Express

Switzerland to ban wearing of burqa and niqab in public places

Windows of Palestinian Homes, Cars Shattered in Suspected West Bank Hate Crime

‘A Huge Opportunity’: Venezuelan Migrants Welcome Colombia’s New Open-Door Policy

Argentina and Bolivia Are Done With the ‘Looting’ IMF

9 Things To Know About The Unfolding Crisis In Ethiopia’s Tigray Region

Himani: This is a massive human rights crisis unfolding. In addition to this explainer, to understand the extent of the violations that have been committed, I recommend reading about the massacres in Axum and Dengelat last November.

Nigerian Authorities Searching For 317 Schoolgirls Kidnapped By ‘Armed Bandits’


Support Independent Queer Media

We’re raising funds to make it through the end of July. 99% of the people who read this site don’t support. Will you be one of the ones who do? Joining A+ is one of the best ways to support Autostraddle — plus you get access to bonus content while keeping the site 99% free for everyone. Will you join today?

Support Autostraddle

Join A+

auto has written 594 articles for us.

11 Comments

  1. I’m not giving up, but I’m having a hard time being optimistic that there will be ways of fixing this coming wave of anti-trans legislation, outside of intervention on a federal level. And that, well, doesn’t feel like it will happen in at least a decade or more given the Supreme Court makeup and Dems unwillingness to do what must be done.

    • I understand where you’re coming from. I think it is hard to be optimistic that what needs to happen will happen at the federal level. They are already waffling on the Equality Act largely because Sinema and Manchin refuse to let go of the filibuster. And then last night, Natalie shared this news from Collins. Basically, Collins’ going to hold the Equality Act hostage to allow organizations (including DV shelters, homeless shelters and schools) to discriminate against and misgender trans individuals they are serving and to allow for a blanket exemption for religious organizations. Given that Manchin also co-signed the failed attempt by Republicans to throw a clause into the recently passed COVID relief to block funds for orgs that allow trans youth to participate in sports and SCOTUS is hearing the case about the Catholic adoption org in Philly… it’s not looking great…

  2. I feel like a direct timeline can be traced from JK Rowling turning terf in front of her massive audience, to first the UK and now the US digging in hard to this current wave of anti-trans legislation. I know that’s of course not the only factor, but I think it’s such a stunningly dire example of how simply “expressing an opinion” doesn’t exempt a person from responsibility for fueling real-world harm.

    Also, I’d like to know where all of these “hormone blockers cause harm to children” concern trolls were when I was prescribed birth control – you know, actual hormones – at age 14 to manage dysmenorrhea.

    • I completely agree with you re: the responsibility that celebrities have for their “opinions” (let’s be real, it’s bias and bigotry). There are real consequences for the things they say, and while I think that plenty of these Republican politicians harbored their fucked up anti-trans views long before Rowling said anything, she certainly normalized these extremist views.

      And I hear you about the hypocrisy of their complaints. These are also the same people that don’t want health insurance to pay for contraceptive care (and got an exemption from religious employers — thanks SCOTUS!) and think abortions should be banned… Basically what it really comes down to is power, control and patriarchy.

  3. “From what I can tell, there are real drawbacks of exiting at this point, which isn’t to say I’m a proponent of continuing the war. It’s truly an impossible situation”

    I don’t have ressources to share that are perspectives of Afghani people on hand, and I’m no expert, but honestly I found it staggering that this CNN article was shared like it was any kind of a pertinent source. It’s basically part of this endless re-spinning of the US-as-savior narrative.

    “Since 9/11, the United States has poured $864 billion and 2,400 lives into Afghanistan in pursuit of a noble idea: turning one of the poorest, most dangerous countries in the world into a self-sufficient democratic state led by a strong, stable Afghan government that cannot be used as a staging ground to plan and launch terrorist attacks against other states.”

    Wow, what a (terrifying) a load of bullshit.

    • I read at least half a dozen articles about pulling troops out of Afghanistan and they all basically read this way which is why I specifically called out that the perspectives being reported are really one sided. The reason why I linked this particular article, though, was because it provides the greatest context on what’s going on (again from an American perspective), including some logistical considerations I hadn’t seen discussed elsewhere about what withdrawing troops entails (for example, destroying weapons facilities as well).

      Also, you missed quoting this part of the CNN article (immediately after the section you pulled out):

      “But those goals have seldom been more out of reach”

      The article isn’t claiming that those ideals were accomplished through 20 years of war, but that was the “justification” given for the war in Afghanistan after 9/11.

      • Also, I just have to add — since you did pull out that particular line from the CNN article. The thing I personally find the most frustrating when the American news media reports on American wars is that they only ever report American casualties. So the U.S. “has poured $864 billion and 2,400 lives into Afghanistan” — yes, and exactly how many Afghan lives have been lost over the last 20 years? They never, EVER share that detail.

Contribute to the conversation...

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated by the guidelines laid out in our comment policy. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation and thanks for stopping by!