Back when I was a mini-Malaika who wasn’t yet allowed to make my own decisions, I had to go to bed early without watching Buffy. Even though all the other kids in my elementary school were talking about it, my dad deemed it off limits. He didn’t approve of the vampires and the violence.
Did I miss out on what researchers are calling the buffy effect? Researchers at Texas A&M University have found that women have less anxiety and both men and women have a more positive attitude towards women after watching violence on television if the female characters are strong. In other words, watching feminism in action is good for you, calms you down and makes you see gay unicorns. I’m getting ahead of myself though. The studies about gay unicorns haven’t been released yet.
However, I am able to fill you in on the details of the buffy effect study. 150 men and women at Texas A&M University were shown three different types of television shows: those with strong leading female characters and sexual violence (Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Law & Order: SVU); those with subservient female characters and sexual violence (The Tudors and Masters of Horror); and those that were deemed neutral (The Gilmore Girls and 7th Heaven). Although I don’t think The Gilmore Girls and 7th Heaven can be so easily relegated to the neutral category — personally, I find The Gilmore Girls far from neutral because it has Rory Gilmore, one of my many tv crushes. As for 7th Heaven, well, at best it works as a fantastic sleeping pill and at worst is a rage-inducing portrayal of gender roles.
But I digress. After they watched the shows, the students were asked to reply to what I would think would be no-brainer questions such as “A woman should not expect to go to exactly the same places or to have quite the same freedom of action of a man,” and, “The intellectual leadership of a community should be largely in the hands of men.”
Men who had just finished watching The Tudors and Masters of Horror would be more likely to express doubt about a woman’s “freedom of action” and men who had watched Buffy did not give sexist answers but reported higher levels of anxiety. Women reported higher levels of anxiety while watching shows with sexual violence combined with subordinate female characters.
The study is interesting and raises the very obvious point that it’s good to have strong female characters on TV. Still, the research leaves me with a lot of questions and frown lines. The first interruption of my otherwise baby-smooth forehead is cause by the sample size: 150 people is not a lot of people. More importantly, the majority of the students came from the same ethnic background — Latino — and the television shows all featured portray mainly white men and women. I’m not sure how race affects reactions to gender roles on television, but that’s the thing: I would’ve liked to have found out. A more thorough study would’ve maybe included more than 150 participants from various backgrounds and they would’ve watched shows with a more diverse cast of leading ladies. Unfortunately it’s hard to find positive depictions of women of colour on television.
As a little girl, I don’t feel I suffered very much from not watching Buffy, but I think that’s because I didn’t really discern between boy and girl, black and white. I could imagine myself as all the awesome characters kicking ass even when they often didn’t share my gender and ethnicity. Just because I was a girl, it didn’t mean I couldn’t be like Ash from Pokemon. It also didn’t stop me from having a crush on Alex from The Secret World of Alex Mack. I was more than a blank canvas onto which a television stereotype could be projected; but I shouldn’t have had to rely on my imagination to make shows over just to better fit me.
While the researchers at Texas A&M University have demonstrated portrayals that of men and women on television affect our anxiety levels and our understanding of gender equality, shows like The Tudors don’t exist in a vacuum. The men who didn’t think women were capable of intellectual leadership didn’t catch their sexism from a casual viewing of a TV show. Locating the origin of misogyny is not an easy task; for that, you’d have to look beyond media to class, race and cultural attitudes. Though this study is an important clue, it’s still only a piece of the puzzle.
This article was brought to you by the hardworking people of Autostraddle, the world’s leading independently owned queer-lady website! If you loved it, you should donate to our bitchin’ fundraiser and be part of the revolution! We’ve got until September 7th to reach our new fundraising goal and you can read more about what’s in it for you here. Every little bit counts. Thank you!
Whenever I’m in a shitty mood my go-to is either Buffy or Alias. It’s oddly comforting to have some science back me up on how these shows are actually a good use of my time. However, after that picture of Alexis Bledel, most of this article became words and shit because my brain could no longer process the English language.
i was about to say i wasn’t ready for that picture of alexis bledel but actually i was. thank you malaika.
Would you call the Gilmore Girls neutral? I think Lorelai Gilmore is pretty badass — she built her life from the ground up, and she gets shit done. I always feel better about life after a GG session.
I wouldn’t consider Gilmore Girls neutral, but apparently because they weren’t beating people up they don’t count as strong female characters
Alex Mack! that is all.
This gives me *FEELINGS*! And a curious stirring I can’t quite put my finger on…
The feeling of reading about your favourite slayer (sorry Faith, Kendra) after a longLONGGGGG day. Off to do some watching..
Studies regarding media psychology are absolutely fascinating.
I have just one thing to add to this and that is…
mmm, eliza dushku can slay me any day.
I accidentally just got sucked into the Eliza Dushku Google Image Search vortex. Whoops.
bless this thread
I named my bike after Missy Pantone – I love Bring It On and I can’t even hide it
Thank you for that.
I mentally add that to every conversation I ever have, pretty much.
Mmmmmmmmmmm, Fuffy.
Wow. I actually just came here to read something whilst waiting for Buffy to buffer cause I’m currently trying to catch up on the feminist badassness that I missed when I was a kid too.
Watching Melissa Harris-Perry makes me feel *very* happy and powerful with righteous rage.
Its nice to see the social sciences backing me up! I was the nerd who did her womens & gender studies thesis on Buffy…
i would honestly like to read that thesis. in my dream world people pay me to write academic papers on buffy all day every day.
“Rage-inducing portrayal of gender roles” was perfect. I gave me computer screen a bit of a “really?” look when I saw what the study deemed “neutral” for almost the same reasons. I mean, Gilmore Girls really empowered me as a tween/teenager and now as a young adult in my early 20s. Lorelai was a badass who raised Rory on her own in Stars Hollow with little help from her parents (yes, she did get some and especially more later as Rory entered college, but digression). Plus, Rory= smart, gorgeous, and a total bookworm nerd like me. As for 7th Heaven, I’m in complete agreement.
As far as I can tell, Gilmore Girls and 7th Heaven are both “neutral” because neither contain sexual violence, which is what the study was about.
Makes sense. I’m regularly reminded of how thankful I am that I watched Buffy growing up, especially with some of the crap I willingly subject myself to now. I think I’d be a different person if I never saw that show.
I grew up with Buffy, like through elementary school into high school, and when I watch an episode now I can reflect back on to my youth and what I was doing that day or year, I just think Buffy brought power and self-esteem into my life, psychological studies aside I believe through the show I felt proud to be a female. TV just hasn’t been the same. I can’t relate to any show, maybe Heroes but that didn’t last as long as Buffy!
I’d love to see an article on the whole ‘waif fu’ aspect of things I see floating round tumblr. On the one hand, maybe they’re right in that yeah a girl who looks like she has muscles etc makes more sense as a super hero/fighter person. On the other hand, I don’t look like that at all because I’m petite and really skinny. I spend an enormous percentage of my time in the world feeling very small and vulnerable and I’m not sure how I feel about people who look like me being written off as weak and powerless.
I love this article. My folks never liked me watching Buffy but I did catch reruns…then later got hooked and watched the series a few times! It was such a good show and got me hooked on pretty much everything Whedon :)
Larissa Olenik and Eliza Dushku are two of the reasons I’m a lesbian. That is all.