Holy Shit, Mississippi, HB1523 is Terrifying
+ Mississippi has joined the ranks of states that now have terrifying bills codifying discrimination against LGBT people with the “Protecting Freedom of Conscience From Government Discrimination Act.” The bill, which passed 31-17, says that “businesses, social workers and public employees cannot be punished for denying services based on the belief that marriage is between a man and a woman or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” It also protects individuals who believe gender is determined at birth.” Good Lord!
Now-infamously, the bill is being derided as even applying to women wearing pants in the workplace and heterosexual people having sex outside of marriage. Yes, that is very bad, but also the more obvious and intended consequences of this bill are extremely bad! Protect Thy Neighbor has compiled a list of hypothetical situations that are now terrifyingly possible, including “a counselor could refuse to help an LGBT person who called a suicide hotline.” Some are saying it’s the most sweeping anti-LGBT legislation in the US.
Although obviously laws aimed at chipping away legal protections for LGBT people are popping up all over the US, most of the others we’ve seen are in practical terms trying to do a small fraction of what we see in the Mississippi law. Bills like more common RFRAs or “Pastor Protection” laws are usually limited to religious institutions or private businesses, although many may have the eventual goal of being gradually bulked up to look like Mississippi’s law. It’s not clear yet what the limits of this law could be, as we haven’t really seen anything like it before — could doctors refuse to treat LGBT patients? Could universities refuse to accept them as students? Unclear! Although the bill is supposed to protect “people” and their religious beliefs, the definition of a person within this bill includes a “sole proprietorship, or closely held company, partnership, association, organization, firm, corporation, cooperative, trust, society or other closely held entity.” What is clear is that Mississippi just got much less safe for many, many people — and that other states may be taking note.
HB2 and its Aftermath
+ North Carolina’s governor Pat McCrory claims he’s not aware of how HB2 interacts with local anti-discrimination ordinances… because he’s been traveling a lot? (This is also patently and obviously untrue, as the reason HB2 gained impetus was because Charlotte had passed a local ordinance, and there was desire to cancel it out.) In what seems to be a truly astonishing interview, he claims that coverage of the bill, which is itself a malicious attack on what transmisogynists like to call “political correctness run amok,” is also political correctness run amok. In case you were worried: no, he does not manage to make it through the interview without asking the reporter “wonder if your daughter or son was showering and all of a sudden a man walks into the locker room and says, ‘This is what I am.’ Would you want that for your child?” PHEW.
+ North Carolina’s attorney general has said he will refuse to defend HB2, because it’s unconstitutional.
“Over the last 15 years our office has defended state officials and agencies when [they] have been sued,” the Democratic attorney general said. “We will continue to do this, but we will not defend the constitutionality of this bill.”
He said his office would “have nothing to do with this.” Cooper explained that on top of the prior reasons listed for not supporting the bill, it also went directly against a nondiscrimination policy that was instated in his office in 2001. “I made a promise,” Cooper said about the policy, “that any employee who gets the job done here should be welcome without fear of discrimination. House Bill 2 is in direct conflict with our policy.”
+ NY’s Governor Cuomo has banned all non-essential state travel to NC in the wake of HB2.
+ On the legal fight against HB2 in North Carolina.
Lead plaintiff Joaquin Carcaño, 27, of Greensboro is a transgender man who works at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill at the school’s Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases and claims the new law will interfere with his ability to do his job. He performs HIV testing and provides medical education to the Latino population, and if he wasn’t able to use the men’s bathroom at work, he would have to set off on a search for a bathroom off campus. The lawsuit says that “preventing him from using the multiple occupancy restroom that other men are able to use is stigmatizing and marks him as different and lesser than other men. It also interferes with his ability to perform his job duties by requiring him to leave his building each time he needs to use the restroom throughout the work day.”
Law & Order
+ The latest in Zubik v. Burwell, the major contraception/religious freedom SCOTUS case you’re probably not hearing much about: rather than handing down a decision, the SCOTUS has asked for additional briefs on the case, specifically regarding “whether and how contraceptive coverage may be obtained by petitioners’ employees through petitioners’ insurance companies, but in a way that does not require any involvement of petitioners beyond their own decision to provide health insurance without contraceptive coverage to their employees.”
+ Park Cannon, Georgia’s newest queer elected official, spoke in the GA House of Representatives for the first time on the subject of its proposed “religious freedom” bill.
+ Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe has vetoed a bill that would have “prohibit the state from punishing religious groups that refuse services related to gay marriages,” saying that to pass it would have been legalizing discrimination.
+ Evangelicals are very sad that Georgia governor Nathan Deal caved to corporations and vetoed a “pastor protection” bill.
“This is a prime example of why Republicans across the nation are concerned and upset,” said Don Hattaway, 51, senior pastor of Tabernacle Baptist Church in Cartersville in north Georgia. “We vote for politicians according to what they say, and then when they get in office they do the contrary. It’s come to the point in Georgia that we don’t know who to trust.”
+ People who lost their licenses because of drug crimes in Massachusetts can now get them back.
+ Loreal Tsingine, a Navajo woman, was killed by police this week in Winslow, Arizona. Officers say they were responding to a report of shoplifting, and that they felt threatened by scissors they report Tsingine had on her person. She was shot five times on a sidewalk.
+ On the horrific abuse of trans women in detention in the US.
“Do you think anyone deserves to be punished like this? Sometimes I get anxious. I thought about killing myself once, but then I regretted it and told myself I wasn’t going to do it. I said, ‘Lord, you gave me my life, why am I going to take it away?’ It’s not His fault they have me suffering here like this.”
+ Police have released surveillance video and photos of the man who raped a trans woman in the Stonewall Inn bathroom, describing him as a “Hispanic man 35 to 45 years old, standing 5’9’’ to 5’11” and weighing about 250 pounds, with a goatee.”
+ There will be no criminal charges filed against the police officers who killed Jamar Clark in Minneapolis. The officers claimed that Clark had tried to grab one of their guns; other witnesses say Clark was handcuffed, and couldn’t have done so. The Hennepin County attorney says that forensic evidence supports the officers’ story. Buzzfeed has a narrative account of the night of Clark’s death and the various accounts of what occurred.
+ The DOJ has revealed its plan to drastically revamp the Newark Police Department, which it found using excessive force and racially discriminatory practices two years ago.
+ Well this is just out of control. What life is like after police ransack your house and take every belonging, then the charges are dropped. Because the medical marijuana laws are confusing in Michigan, all this family’s property is destroyed and their kids are traumatized by a guns-out raid — and this is a white family in a state where marijuana is legal in some situations! Not, of course, that they are less deserving of police violence than other families, but you can imagine how much worse this is and how much more often it happens to other people.
Under asset forfeiture laws, police are allowed to seize and keep property suspected of involvement in a crime, regardless of whether the property’s owners are ever convicted — or even charged, in many cases. Michigan’s laws are particularly skewed against property owners, according a 2015 report from the Institute for Justice. The nonprofit civil liberties law firm gave Michigan a D- on its forfeiture laws, citing “poor protections for innocent property owners” and policies that allow police to keep up to 100 percent of the proceeds from forfeited property, creating a profit motive for seizing belongings. Annette Shattuck says that since the charges have been dismissed, the Drug Task Force has returned some of her property. But much of it is damaged. Electronic items are missing power cords and remotes. Her and her husband’s phones were smashed. They returned her husband’s guns and the safe he stored it in, but they didn’t return the key. Two of the kids’ insurance cards are missing. Shattuck says her marriage and birth certificates haven’t been returned, and since the Task Force does not itemize seized documents in its paperwork, it has no record of taking them in the first place.
+ Obama has now commuted the sentences of 248 incarcerated people over his two terms, most recently 61 people incarcerated for drug offenses.
+ Alarmingly, the US Border Patrol union has endorsed Donald Trump, the candidate who has suggested essentially deporting any group he doesn’t feel like a fan of on a whim.
+ Welp, Donald Trump visited Wisconsin! It was protested before he even arrived in the state, with six people handcuffing themselves together inside the hotel scheduled to host him. During a protest outside his event in Janesville, a 15-year-old girl was pepper sprayed at close range in the face after defending herself from being groped. He also did a bunch of radio interviews, with mixed success.
+ An interview with Angela Davis on the “fascist appeal” of Trump and why she’s not endorsing anybody.
Endorsing? I don’t endorse. But let me say that, well, to be frank, I’ve actually never voted for one of the two-party—two major parties in a presidential election before Barack Obama. I believe in independent politics. I still think that we need a new party, a party that is grounded in labor, a party that can speak to all of the issues around racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, what is happening in the world. We don’t yet have that party. And even as we participate in this electoral process, as it exists today, I think we need to be looking ahead toward a very different kind of political process. At the same time, we put pressure on whoever is running. So I’m actually more interested in helping to develop mass movements that can create the kind of pressure that will force whoever is elected or whoever becomes the candidate to move in more progressive directions.
+ A new study looks at the US’s ten largest school districts, which happen to count students of color in the majority, and found that several have more school police officers than guidance counselors.
+ New York’s Cooper Union will remove gender markers from its bathrooms.
“I cannot change the outside world and how it treats transgender and gender non-conforming people,” he continued. “But I can change the Cooper Union environment to help everyone feel safe when they are inside our buildings.”
+ New updates to guidelines for Mifeprex, a pill that can terminate a pregnancy early on in its progress, say that pregnant people can take it within a longer time period than previously recommended, ten weeks instead of seven, and that it can be taken at home rather than needing to be taken in the presence of a physician.
+ Karen Ocamb has been writing and reporting on LGBT news for years, having joined LGBT print publication Frontiers Magazine in 2002. As of this week, she’s not anymore — because Frontiers called her in out of vacation to tell her that they were letting her go because they were “moving toward a digital and millennial audience, and we wanted to give the generation of millennials a real shot at creating our content.”
+ This just in: MetroWeekly found a Maryland Republican who is a homophobe with a lesbian daughter, and also appears to love saying nonsense things. “I have a lesbian daughter. I love my daughter, I want no harm to come to her, but our traditions matter and tolerance is a two-way street.”
+ The governor of Utah has signed a bill requiring anesthesia for abortions occurring after 20 weeks, based on the patently false idea that 20-week-old fetuses can feel pain. (They cannot.)
+ A new report shows that the Affordable Care Act did help the most vulnerable Americans access health insurance.
+ On how increased awareness of government surveillance of citizens is inhibiting those in marginalized groups who feel targeted by surveillance to share their thoughts and opinions.
Researchers presented 255 participants with a fictitious Facebook post discussing a hypothetical U.S. airstrike targeting ISIS. They were then asked whether the airstrike was a good or a bad decision. Additionally, about half of those participants were also shown a post that alluded to the government’s online surveillance programs. The study found that politically active participants were more likely to express an opinion if they felt that a terrorist attack was imminent. Overall, people who perceived themselves as having an unpopular opinion were less likely to comment, share, like, or post, in response to news of a U.S. airstrike campaign. The most startling finding, however, was that people who believed the government was collecting their online data refused to share their feelings even if the majority of comments supported their opinions. “When individuals think they are being monitored and disapprove of such surveillance practices, they are equally as unlikely to voice opinions in friendly opinion climates as they are in hostile ones,” researchers concluded.
+ In a poll of a sample of registered voters, 50% said they supported a temporary ban on Muslims traveling to the US, and that number included one third of Democrats. For those wondering how Trump’s popularity could be possible, well, there’s a piece of the puzzle!