Well, I have good news and bad news about Apple TV+’s new show, Murderbot. The good news is, everyone is gay!! The titular Murderbot (Alexander Skarsgård) is assigned to a group of humans he calls “hippie scientists” from a planetary commune and every last one of them is queer. We have nonbinary Pin-Lee (played by nonbinary actor Sabrina Wu), their wife Arada (Tattiawna Jones), another point in their triangle Ratthi (Akshay Khanna), and the rest of their crew who are also revealed to be queer (or at least non-traditional by our Earthly human standards) along the way: Bharadwaj (Tamara Podemski), Gurathin (David Dastmalchian), and their fearless leader Mensah (Noma Dumezweni). This diverse group of misfits is the perfect example of a found family, for all its friendship, support, in-fighting, messy relationship drama, and unconditional love for one another.
The bad news is that I didn’t like this show as much as I wanted to. The trailer looked fun and the cast is great — Noma Dumezweni specifically was phenomenal — but it didn’t quite hit for me. I felt like it couldn’t decide if it wanted to be a comedy or a drama; it wasn’t consistently funny enough to be comedic or deep enough to be dramatic. It wobbled on a line that kept taking me out of the show. When you have actors like Tamara Podemski and Noma Dumezweni (yeah I’m mentioning her again, she’s that great) acting their asses off, but then Anna Konkle popping in like she’s doing an SNL sketch, it feels disjointed. The early episodes felt like they were going to lean more into the comedy; they kept cutting to Murderbot’s favorite show, The Rise and Fall of Sanctuary Moon, which has Clark Gregg, John Cho, DeWanda Wise, and Jack McBrayer looking and acting ridiculous in a Star Trek-esque parody soap opera, and if they had kept that tone throughout, it might have worked. OR if they had skipped the slapstick and kept only the light humor sprinkled in over deeper and darker material like the last few episodes, that might have worked, too. The combination didn’t quite do it for me. There was something about the writing that was juuuuust out of my reach, and I think it can be explained, at least partially, by the fact that the show is written, directed, and produced exclusively by men, despite its source material The Murderbot Diaries being written by a woman. (I’d be really curious to know how it compares in tone to Martha Wells’ book series.)
That said, there’s still plenty to like about this series besides the acting and the guest stars. For one thing, Murderbot — despite being a security unit who hacked his own self to be sentient — is very relatable. He hates making eye contact, thinks humans are weird and/or assholes, and prefers to spend his time watching his favorite television shows than interacting with others. He seems to have some aspects of depression and anxiety (though I think this could have been explored further), despite supposedly not being programmed to have feelings at all. One could argue he’s asexual and aromantic, because he says he skips over the romantic parts of his shows and shows contempt for the humans when they get frisky, but considering he is technically programmed to have no emotions and has Ken doll parts, I’m not sure I would classify him as aro/ace representation. Not only do I not think that was the show’s intention, I think it could venture too close to harmful and dehumanizing stereotypes to compare aro/ace humans to a literal robot. I’ll leave that to each individual aro/ace person to decide if they feel represented by him. That said, as a neurodivergent person who does see similarities in him to me (e.g. being unable to figure out small talk to save our lives), there’s something to be said for the metaphor of being literally built different. And again, if I thought the show was genuinely trying to go there, I would be more willing to engage with this potential interpretation further. Alas.
As for the LGBTQ+ aspects that WERE explored, the humans’ queerness is approached very matter-of-factly. It is space in the distant future, of course humans have evolved past stressing about the binaries of gender and sexuality most of our country currently believes exist. Every character’s queerness is revealed in subtle ways throughout the first few episodes with no fanfare, just as part of their lore drops as Murderbot learns about them. There’s even a (brief and largely unexplored) depiction of a healthy polyamorous relationship! (Well, attempts were made. The choices they made before entering into it were healthy, whether or not the relationship is, that’s up for debate.)
While it wasn’t exactly to my taste, had a bit of a predictable throughline, and didn’t quite match the quality of other shows Apple TV+ has been giving us recently, it’s only ten episodes at about 30 minutes each, so it’s not a very big time commitment. I think part of the issue I personally have is that my bar for realistic-looking humanoid AIs gaining sentience is the TV show Humans, and nothing will ever reach that standard. (Not even Westworld. There I said it. Though it admittedly came close.)
So, give Murderbot a shot and come back and let me know what you think! I’d love for you to tell me I must have been in a weird mood this week and actually it’s the best show ever. Or better yet, go watch it and come back and tell me all the ways you agree with me.
Murderbot is now streaming on Apple TV+.
BTW Murderbot usees it/its pronouns, not he/him :)
Echoing Lulu’s comment above that Murderbot’s pronouns (self-chosen) are it/its and that is what’s used in the show as well as the book. Very jarring to see he/him!
I agree Valerie Anne that the tone is off. It feels like they are trying to make it more comedic than the book is (not that the book isn’t funny, it is, but in a darker way than some of the silly comedy that’s in the first two episodes of the show). It didn’t land the balance of comedy and drama that the books do so well.
I love the books and this adaptation didn’t live up to them for me. The characterization of the group from Preservation as silly hippies did not feel right, both tonally with the story or with the characters as they are in the books. I’m still going to keep watching though!
Thanks Casey, I was waiting to see a viewpoint from someone that loves the books, while I continue to deliberate about watching the show!
One of my concerns was how Murderbot’s gender (or rejection of) would be handled, and it’s clear that it can’t really have been handled at all if it came off as a he!!!
Also Valerie Anne I totally agree that Humans is the high bar. Niska forever!!
Maybe the show will get better if it sorts out the tone??
I do highly recommend the audiobooks of Murderbot if you read those Sally, instead of the show. The voice actor Kevin R. Free does an incredible job!
In the show, the other characters refer to Murderbot using it, not he, but I definitely think the character reads masculine because it’s played by a male actor.
That’s honestly my biggest problem with the adaptation. I loved the books and I’m planning to keep watching the show, at least for the moment. But yeah, not happy with how they handled Murderbot’s (lack of) gender.
It’s funny. I agree with most of this comment Casey, but the portrayal of the Preservation group humans doesn’t bother me at all. Maybe because I don’t care that much about them in the books – I know Dr Mensa but the rest kind of blend together for me. I care much more about SecUnit (and ART in later books).
Sadly the off tone arises from the books. They’re always describing the disconnects from which humor could potentially arise from Murderbot’s unique perspective, rather than crafting scenarios where humor actually arises.
I also wanted to like this more than I did, but I’m going to keep watching it.
I love the books and have read all 7 of them (with more to come, I hope). My biggest disappointment is the casting of Alexander Skarsgård – he’s too masculine and too human looking. In the books Murderbot is agender and is very clear that it doesn’t identify as human. I do think Skarsgård‘s acting is pretty impressive, but he reads too masculine.
And also – I relate So Hard to book Murderbot – it achieves sentience and can do anything it wants and what it wants is to be left alone to do its job and watch its shows. And I’m not getting that connection to tv show Murderbot yet.
About the tone – I thought the books were less comedic/ slapstick, although there is humor from Murderbot’s sarcastic narration. And I deliberately didn’t reread book 1 (the books this season is based on), so I could be misremembering the tone.
I think the choice to include parts of Sanctuary Moon and to make it “campy Star Trek” makes it more comedic. Sanctuary Moon is definitely an important part of the books but we just get Murderbot’s descriptions of watching it, not full on scenes.
There’s a Murderbot thread on Smart Bitches, Trashy Books and a lot of the commenters (all fans of the books) love the show so far. I’m still on the fence – I love the books so much that I want to love the series (and I want everyone else to read it and watch it). But so far, I like it but don’t love it.