“Mrs. America” Is a Feminist Triumph and a Cautionary Tale

At the beginning of every episode of the FX/Hulu mini-series Mrs. America, a disclaimer lets viewers know some of what’s coming has been “invented for creative and storyline purposes,” but with the exception of a few composite characters and scenes, the history is solid. And why wouldn’t it be? Second-wave feminism boasts enough real life charismatic women and drama to fill out more than one mini-series, and that’s before you add in feminism’s arch-nemesis, Phyllis Schlafly. (Don’t worry, even Cate Blanchett won’t compel you to be attracted to Schlafly.) But what makes Mrs. America great isn’t just its no-pulled-punches accuracy, or its award-winning performances — in addition to Blanchett, there’s Rose Byrne as Gloria Steinem, Uzo Aduba as Shirley Chisholm, Tracey Ullman as Betty Friedan, Elizabeth Banks as Jill Ruckelshaus, and Sarah Paulson as a mash-up of Schlafly’s anti-feminist pals — but its commitment to being just really good television.

Of course, it’s impossible to watch Mrs. America and not make connections to today’s political nightmare in the United States, which makes sense because so much of the “family values” and “coastal elite” rhetoric that shaped the modern day Republican Party and its conservative punditry herd came directly out of Phyllis Schlafly’s mouth. In the first episode, when she says feminists are “a small elitist group of northeastern establishment liberals putting down the homemakers,” you can see the twisted game of telephone that ultimately spawned Megyn Kelly that then spawned Sarah Palin that then spawned Donald Trump. In fact, one of the last things Schlafly did before she died was endorse Trump.

Mrs. America covers a lot of ground over nine episodes, the first three of which have already dropped on Hulu and will continue to roll out weekly on Fridays, and it does so with a structure that pays off in punch: each character gets her own episode.

It starts with Phyllis Schlafly, which would seem like an odd choice, but it’s Cate Blanchett and while the writing and her performance don’t conjure up any sympathy for Schlafly, it certainly colors in her motivation and her ambition. While the series’ feminists all have their myriad ideas for how they should get the Equal Rights Amendment passed, how they should force Democrats to champion abortion, how they should shape the messaging and structure of the National Women’s Political Caucus, Schlafly mostly just wants to be heard and make decisions for other people. After two failed attempts at getting elected to Congress, her husband (John Slattery) is over paying for her political aspirations and entertaining the idea that she’ll be away in Washington D.C. and not home to cook his dinner and serve up sex whenever he wants it. She acquiesces, but immediately plays it to get more of what she wants, including going to D.C. to lobby Congress on not agreeing to SALT (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks).

Once she gets there, she realizes they’re not going to take her seriously, despite the fact that she’s been presenting herself as a defense strategist for years. Instead, they ask her what she thinks of the ERA. “I’ve never been discriminated against,” she says, as they refuse to listen to her and also ask her to take minutes for the meeting. As she’s fetching a notepad, she hears less of the noise of the men inside the office and more of the noise of the women protesting outside. She goes back in and makes her move. She becomes the ERA’s worst nightmare.

Schlafly’s bravado, charisma, and rage are all written so plainly on Blanchett’s face, conveyed through even the slightest movements of her body. She is a woman who’s going to get what she wants, and what she wants is influence and to maintain her privilege. (She literally protests with that slogan! “STOP! Stop Taking Our Privilege!”)

Gloria Steinem is the focus of the second episode, as she struggles to balance all the demands and attention of her position in the feminist movement. There’s Schlafly to contend with, and Steinem confesses that she’s right about at least one thing: feminists do have the power to strip the fun out of things. There’s the in-fighting of the NWPC, and especially her contentious relationship with Friedan, who because of her outdated views, especially around race, finds herself being pushed out of a movement that wouldn’t exist without her. Steinem is especially preoccupied with the fact that she’s become the face of the movement because of, well, her face. She’s beautiful in a hip, modern, nonchalant way that women all over the country can imprint on. And there’s Shirley Chisholm’s run for president. Steinem both thinks Chisholm deserves the nomination and believes it when the Democratic Party tells her Chisholm can’t get elected and she’s got to throw her weight behind George McGovern (especially if she wants to see abortion in the Democratic National Campaign platform).

Which is right where “Shirley” picks up, with a performance by Uzo Aduba that frankly deserves an Emmy and its own mini-series. (Notable: Two black women, Tanya Barfield and Amma Asante, wrote and directed episode. Asante is only the second black director Aduba’s worked with.) “Shirley” is bookended by two scenes that don’t include Chisholm, even though she’s in the climax of her historic run for president. In the first, Schlafly surveys the atomic bunker her husband’s wealth has afforded her. In the last, Schlafly gives away outdated canned goods from the bunker to her black housekeeper because she’s not going to eat them. In between that scathing cultural indictment, Chisholm tries to salvage her campaign while everyone around her begs her to give in to McGovern. “I didn’t get anywhere in my life waiting on somebody’s permission,” she says, when she’s willing herself to stay in. She eventually does and joins him on stage at the DNC. Steinem cheers. Chisholm smiles. But there’s no joy in it.

In “Gloria,” Steinem gives in to her publisher on the first issue of Ms. magazine, and while she ends up with the most iconic feminist magazine imagery of all-time — Wonder Woman batting down a Vietnamese fighter plane with one hand, carrying a city to safety wrapped in her golden lasso in the other, a hope for “Peace and Justice in ’72,” and a plea of “Wonder Woman for President” — she also sells out Chisholm, who’d been promised the cover.

Mrs. America doesn’t get into it, of course, but the Ms. magazine Wonder Woman was a departure from the Wonder Woman of the late ’60s and early ’70s, a fashion-obsessed mod Diana who’d been stricken of her powers and forced to work as a regular human private detective. In the cover story, editor Joanne Edgar wrote about growing up trading comic books with the boys on her street. One Superman book was worth three Wonder Woman books. By putting her on the cover and reprinting some of the original Golden Age panels inside, Steinem and her co-editors forced DC Comics to return Wonder Woman to her roots and her superpowers.

When DC gave Wonder Woman back her bulletproof bracelets, her invisible airplane, her magical lasso, they also gave her an Amazonian sister named Nubia. DC’s editors told the Ms. magazine editors a black sidekick was enough, to leave them alone.

Schlafly’s crusade against feminists and the “liberal elite” was prophetic. But so was the feminist movement’s treatment of Chisholm. When she was forced to drop out of the presidential race, Chisholm famously said to Gloria Steinem, “Power concedes nothing.”

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Heather Hogan

Heather Hogan is an Autostraddle senior editor who lives in New York City with her wife, Stacy, and their cackle of rescued pets. She's a member of the Television Critics Association, GALECA: The Society of LGBTQ Entertainment Critics, and a Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer critic. You can also find her on Twitter and Instagram.

Heather has written 1718 articles for us.


  1. Phyllis Schlafly’s description of feminists as “a small elitist group of northeastern establishment liberals putting down the homemakers” wasn’t totally off the mark. The same dismissive attitude toward women who choose a life as wife and mother over a career outside the home is what bit us in the ass again in 2016. Homemakers were offended by Hillary Clinton’s “I’m not some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette” comment, and that’s no small part of the reason there’s currently an orange imbecile in the White House “leading” us to our doom.

    Women are used to being disrespected and underestimated by men, but when they are treated that way by other women, it just hits different.

    That being said, Mrs. America is a great show with an incredible cast and (sorry, Heather) I am, in fact, wildly attracted to Cate Blanchett’s Phyllis Schlafly.

    • This is such an interesting thing to me. I have heard about this cleave for years. It was a huge part of my own mom’s narrative about how other mothers viewed her. I’ve heard SAHMs and working mothers both griping about the other group judging them, while I have NEVER in my life heard the actual judgement pass the lips of the other type of parent. It’s the weirdest dynamic, and in my mind it feels totally manufactured. It sounds like this is a part of it.

      • I was in 9th grade in 2000/2001 the first time I remeber hearing an adult woman who I liked and respected insult working moms. I was watching a movie with friends, but evesdropping on adult conversations was always more interesting than some shitty 90s thriller. My friend’s mom was talking to my mother in a neighboring room and said some dumb shit about how working moms are too busy advancing their careers to care about their kids.
        And because my mom is a badass feminist who also chose to be a stay at home mom, she shut that shit down.
        I also remember being super proud of my mom and yet sad that this woman I respected said dumb shit about other women.

        • I’m so glad your mom did that! It’s such a tough thing, with no winners but the patriarchy. My mom HATED Hillary, because of the above comments and because she *let* her husband cheat/“rolled over” and forgave him. My sisters ended up inheriting the same bad taste, probably after hearing years of vitriol, and refused to vote for her. I still have this feeling that a lot of the conflict between working and SAHMs is manufactured, and this is part of it. (Im usually careful to talk about parents and not just moms but this is definitely focuses on the experience of mothers in a hetero nuclear family).

          • My mom is an awesome woman and both my parents made a point of taking about how sexism fucks over everyone.

            The tension between SAHM & working mom & women who don’t have children is real and also total bullshit. No one wins, including stay at home dads & working dads & men who don’t have children. It assumes that women cannot adequately take care of “the children!” and have a career BUT ALSO if you child is in some form of childcare you are a straight up monster for outsourcing your child’s care BUT ALSO how can the daycare workers be competent at child care if they don’t have their own family? And HOLY SHIT don’t get me started about how AMAZING it is that your husband SACRIFICED HIS CAREER to be a stay at home dad! What a hero!
            (All of these things I have heard from women while working in childcare. Some of the parents would say dumb shit, and others would vent to me because I was openly gay and they knew I would also find these statement abhorrent.)

            That shit though, about Hillary, runs rampant through the suburbs. I have heard grown ass college educated women tell me that they don’t follow politics so they just vote for whoever their husbands tell them to vote for and usually their husbands hate Hillary ’cause she’s a huge bitch. I’ve heard them say she was a pushover for staying with Bill at the same time I’ve heard women say they would never vote for a divorced woman. And then! there are the women who were SO ABOUT HILLARY and VOTE FOR HILLARY and WOMEN SOLIDARITY and also know they verbally abuse their step kids so that’s a fun dynamic.

            Sorry this turned into a novel. I have a lot of feelings.

    • I think that it’s a stretch to say that homemakers being offended by Clinton’s comment was a big factor in her losing the 2016 election. Privileged White women readily selling out minorities (and white women who are not so privileged) in order to clutch to the vestiges of power is a tale as as old as Phyllis Schlafly.

    • *white* women, maybe. It’s funny, women of color didn’t seem to have that issue when it came to voting for Hilary no matter how we felt about her. We knew the alternative would have a much worse outcome for us. Hmm. I guess “The 53%” felt different.

Contribute to the conversation...

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated by the guidelines laid out in our comment policy. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation and thanks for stopping by!