New Guidelines Make Binational Gay Couple Deportation “Low Priority,” But Not “Non-Priority”

The Department of Homeland Security has now drafted up written guidelines for binational and immigrant same-sex couples and families to now be considered “low-priority” in deportation cases. In June 2011, the Department of Homeland Security “spelled out factors Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers should consider when deciding which immigration cases are classified as ‘low priority’ for removal.” One of the major factors includes family ties to a U.S. citizen. However, because the Defense of Marriage Act prohibits same-sex couples from being federally recognized as equal to married heterosexual couples, no one was completely sure if these new rules included same-sex partners. Hence the new guidelines and the good news.

“In an effort to make clear the definition of the phrase ‘family relationships,’ I have directed ICE to disseminate written guidance to the field that the interpretation of the phrase ‘family relationships’ includes long-term, same-sex partners,” Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano wrote.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Jerrold Nadler, as well as 80 other members in Congress requested the written guidelines in an effort to make the “families of U.S. citizens” clause clearer.

Nancy Pelosi with binational couple Bradford Wells and Anthony John Makk
via {The Advocate}

A national organization for gay, lesbian, and transgender immigration rights, Immigration Equality, is praising this change as a step in the right direction. They’re absolutely right, this is a great step, but it’s a small step. This “low-priority” status is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to binational same-sex couple immigration.

Binational same-sex couples cannot be considered married for immigration purposes because of DOMA. U.S. citizens and permanent residents with same-sex partners or in same-sex marriages cannot sponsor their spouses for a partner visa, nor can same-sex partners accompany their spouses into the U.S. on the basis of a family or employment-based visa.

So, you can’t legally get into the United States based on the fact that your partner or spouse lives or works here. This new written Department of Homeland Security law doesn’t help with that. The new guidelines also don’t help if you leave the country and would like to return or if you’re interested in getting a job. This new guideline only protects you as an undocumented immigrant living with your partner or spouse in America, and it doesn’t give you rights. It just means Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers won’t come banging on your door. I suppose we could call that a small success, but there’s more to be done.

via {Jezabel}

Currently, there has been a bill introduced called the Uniting American Families Act. The Uniting American Families Act would allow U.S. citizens to sponsor their long-term same-sex partners or spouses just as heterosexual couples do. UAFA refers to same-sex couples as “permanent partners” which is pretty adorable, and outlines that permanent partners would have to be financially interdependent, neither party can be legally married to another person, and they must be unable to enter into a marriage under the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act — the one that gives heterosexual couples the rights to sponsor their partners for a green card or visa into the United States.

The United States lags behind 19 countries that recognize same-sex couples for immigration purposes: Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Israel, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. None of these countries has reported fraud problems associated with its decision to allow immigration equality for its citizens.

When I was previously engaged to an Australian woman, this inequality of immigration rights took a huge toll on our relationship. There was only the option of living abroad with her or living in the United States without her. I’m not alone in this frustration. When speaking to a friend about her relationship with a South African woman, she said, “The research basically turns out to be ‘hope that her country likes you better!'” It’s great if your partner’s home country does allow same-sex couples to immigrate, but what about all of the countries that don’t? What happens then?

It’s easy to be pessimistic when it comes to small steps, but the only remedy is to continue to be involved and push for change, especially with the Uniting American Families Act. The bill has a large number of co-sponsors and may have a pretty good chance of getting passed. The best way to ensure this is to contact your local Congress members, a feat that Immigration Equality’s Action Fund makes quite easy.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!


Hansen is the former DIY & Food Editor of and likes to spend most days making and cooking and writing. She teaches creative writing at Colorado State University and is pursuing a Masters of Fine Arts in her free time.

Hansen has written 189 articles for us.


  1. As the foreign half of a binational same-sex couple I am actually more hopeful that the Supreme Ccourt will strike down section 3 of DOMA than I am of UAFA passing.

    • I’ve been following this story for the similar reasons. I definitely think it’s a huge deal but agree that it can’t change much long as sec 3 of DOMA exists. Best case scenario it’ll at least delay the deportation of foreign partners in committed same sex relationships long enough for DOMA to be repealed.

  2. Yes I’m waiting for the preme court decision on DOMA cases. My spouse got granted with politic asylum two months ago, we got married before that but he still can’t ask for me. We live together very happy in new York, but worried about my legal status. I hope the court desicion coming soon to enjoy 100% of this beautiful country

  3. I’m so honored that our skype conversations are worthy of being quoted in an article.

    But also thank you for the realistic look on this. The “low-priority” deportation status is a good start, but there needs to be much, much more done to keep these kinds of families together.

  4. I’m half of bi-national same-sex couple also. I was lucky enough to score a 1 year work visa for the states, but once that’s done, my girlfriend has to move to NZ.
    I feel for her. She has more reason to stay in the USA than I do to stay in NZ. It really is absolutely ridiculous.
    And what’s crazy is most people we talk to about it actually have no idea that I am not able to “just marry her and stay”. How many Americans actually know that this is a real issue for a lot of people???

  5. I was able to move to Australia because they allowed my now-wife to sponsor me. She’s a dual citizen so it wasn’t a matter of that being the only way we could be together… I don’t even like to think about that.

    Everyone should have the right to go through the annoyingness that is dealing with all that paperwork, dammit.

  6. Oh, this is the story of my life right now. US citizen. Japanese fiancee. Been engaged for 2 years. Can’t get married because then there is no hope of her ever coming here. Instead she’s coming here for university. Gotta pretend we never knew each other. Worried that after she gets her degree we may never be able to live in the same country again. Living with that pressure and worry every single day. Want kids, but afraid that our situation would make having kids a disaster. Can’t move forward with life worrying about long-term immigration status.

    This news, while a step in the right direction, does not take away the specter of deportation or provide a glimmer of security.

Comments are closed.