I Just Wish I Had a Little More Money For Myself
Q
We both have full-time jobs but my wife makes extremely more money than I do, and she’s really generous about how she spends it, covering most of our rent and bills and so forth. But this also means she can make all the decisions about what we do, where we travel, what we get for the house, all of it. After putting my (much smaller) share of money towards our shared expenses, I have very little left over for just myself (maybe $150 or so a month), and sometimes I do wish I was able to make more decisions about things I might want to do for myself, not have to save up for things that are just for me, or ask her for money when there’s an emergency, like a car repair. (i don’t have any savings, she mananges the savings for the family!) I do sometimes get jealous that she is able to do stuff like buy clothes or get her nails done on a whim whereas I have to plan really carefully for expenses like that. Or wait for her to invite me to go with her and offer to pay for whatever it is she is about to spend money on that I would also like. I think this is normal for couples where one person is the breadwinner? But I’m not really sure…. so I guess I am asking you all if this is normal. I am really afraid that asking her directly about it will make me seem ungrateful for everything she pays for, and everything I’m able to do because of her, like live in this beautiful house and go on nice vacations.
A:
Summer: Hey lovely! My previous relationship was a bit like yours at times, but I was the higher earner. My girlfriend at the time even jokingly referred to herself as the ‘breadloser’ in contrast to me being a breadwinner. To actually address the question, what you’re going through is pretty normal in relationships where A. There’s an income disparity; B. The finances are largely kept separate. When partners choose to not intertwine finances, it’s a little bit more ‘pull your own weight’. There’s more self-reliance since there’s no expectation that the higher earner must cover the majority.
One downside to that is the higher earner tends to have more decision-making power because they simply have more leeway to do things. However, one could argue that if the high earner extended their influence to cover the low earner, they’d still have more power. It just looks different. It’s also normal to feel a little uncomfortable if your mindset prizes resource application and ‘fairness’. Money is a critical resource in this wretched world we’ve built, so it’s understandable if you feel like you’re contributing less of a critical resource. However, relationships are about much more than money. Your time shared, personal connection, mutual support, are all meaningful contributions. I mean, the 50s housewife dynamic was built on the idea that one person brings in wealth and the other provides value in other ways: household and financial management, childcare, and emotional support. That system isn’t bad because it’s inherently immoral. It went sour when the woman’s work was devalued next to income, and being a housewife didn’t grant access to public life.
It sounds like you have a fairly good relationship. Finances are a serious topic worthy of discussion, so please talk to your wife about your feelings and whether she feels your contribution to the relationship is fair. In her view, you may already be giving plenty, or there might be room to provide things that aren’t cashflow.
Nico: Like Summer said, when finances are somewhat separate in a household, things can be tricky if there is an income disparity. However, you also mention that your wife “manages the savings” for both of you and that you “don’t have savings,” and it feels like both can’t be true at the same time! Is there a way you can talk to your wife and ask if you can take on a bigger role in managing the household finances with her? It may just be that she’s taken on that decisionmaking by default or because she feels she has to. You put all your money toward shared expenses and have just $150 leftover for discretionary spending that seems to include car maintenance, among other things that don’t feel like discretionary spending items, but rather like household expenses.
I think you just need to be honest. You expressed yourself pretty well here. It’s hard on you emotionally to have to ask for money in emergencies and it’s also hard for you to save money after contributing to the household expenses. You feel unsure about asking your wife to pay for things like nails for the both of you when you know she is already shouldering most of the household expenses and that you are enjoying things like your house and vacations because of her. You can say these things to her, and hopefully, she’ll be understanding and open to working on ways for you to feel less stressed and awkward and yucky! This might include being brought in on decisionmaking in a different way, or finding other ways to contribute to the household, or her reassuring you about things. I would definitely prepare for the conversation ahead of time, ask her to have it at a time where you can both be relaxed, and avoid hitting her with it out of the blue. Money can be an emotional topic so you want to make sure you’re taking care to have this talk when you both feel emotionally safe.
Is a Dirty Apartment a Fair Dealbreaker?
Q
i was seeing someone and it was going super well. we clicked immediately and shared many interests. but i took a step back after my first visit to her apartment. i’m a very clean person, and this place was a mess, even though she knew i was coming over. clothes everywhere, dirty dishes, cat hair on everything, a refrigerator full of stuff that needed to be thrown out. i was immediately honest with her, and she wasn’t insulted, or it didn’t seem that way. she said cleaning just isn’t a priority to her and that she was fundamentally opposed to changing just to make a partner happy (she had been in an abusive situation before this where she changed for someone else and had vowed to never do that again). my apartment is spotless and i really like to keep it that way. i said we’d probably be better as friends and she was okay with that, again at least on the surface. we have kept texting and seen each other in group situations, and i’m still drawn to her. still, I just can’t imagine it working. am i being stupid?
A
Valerie: I don’t think it’s wrong for you to consider a dirty apartment a dealbreaker if a clean space is important to you. It’s a fundamental lifestyle difference. You have to imagine living together: would you be okay with always taking on all of the cleaning tasks and never asking her to pitch in? Because she has made it clear she probably won’t, so that’s not something you can count on. If you like cleaning enough that you’re willing to take that on, then it’s something to consider. If not, if you think you’d come to resent her for not pitching in or for leaving messes behind, then it’s not worth starting something. That said, if the attraction is there and you both would be down for something more casual, explicitly stated going into it, there’s no harm in that.
Summer: As I get older, I’m starting to realize that a person’s default approach to cleanliness is reflective of their well-being. That’s not to say that tidy and fastidious people have ‘better’ mental health, or that messy homes are a sign of moral failings. Instead, I now believe that when a person’s housekeeping will match their state of contentment. A happy person in a messy house is happy living there, and imposing tidiness would probably push them out of their comfort zone and into unhappiness. A happy person in a clean house probably won’t revert to mess unless something really goes wrong. I’m firmly on the clean-and-ordered side and I would not be happy in a relationship with someone whose preferred state is messy. But I’ve come to see that not everyone is happiest in an environment that’s completely tidy and ordered.
Based on that? Yeah, I’m with Valerie. If your happy state involves cleanliness, then it’s fair to not wanna change or adapt to someone else whose living environment would be bad for your well-being. The person you’re seeing appears content with their space and also has their reasons, so I also don’t think it’ll be productive to push them into change.
Nico: It sounds like your date/friend knows herself and her priorities well enough to be able to articulate them to you and to stand her ground on what she is and is not going to compromise on. The thing about dealbreakers early on in dating is that literally anything that will bother you later in the relationship to an extent that will compromise the relationship can be a dealbreaker and that is totally okay. Early dating is the discovery stage, when you’re trying to determine whether or not to move forward, and it can take a lot of dates with a lot of different people to find someone who is compatible enough to pursue deepening the relationship. If you cannot date someone who is a higher level of messy, then you can’t do that. It sounds like she took it relatively well. If you do decide to change your mind, then I do want to caution you that if her messiness becomes an issue for you later in the relationship, then that will probably be pretty hurtful to her because by changing your mind, you’re saying that you are going to overlook the messiness that originally gave you pause.
Submit your own advice questions right here!
AF members get the benefit of having your advice questions answered by the team. We do our best to answer every question, which is like, 99% of them — very rarely do they stump us. Questions remain anonymous!
Comments
I am really concerned for the first letter writer. I would say that what she describes is a common challenge when people start dating, or sometimes even when living together, but if you’re married then it’s a serious concern. Because this is the kind of split that can be okay if it’s a temporary thing, but if you’re married that means you’re presumably committing to being together long-term, ideally for the rest of your lives.
The logistics of exactly how you split your money will vary from couple to couple, but just because your wife makes more does not mean she should have control over all big decisions and discretionary spending. And I say that as someone who works in higher education with a spouse who is a manager in tech. My husband has always made more money than I do, and at this point the taxes we pay on his income are more than my net income. When I was in grad school the difference was even more extreme. We each have chunks of money we spend separately, but it isn’t proportional to our income difference. And we definitely make all big decisions together. Even for my parents, where my dad worked and my mom was a stay-at-home parent for my whole childhood they have always had equal say in big decisions. I mean, unless you signed an extreme prenup (and to an extent depending on where you live) when you get married your money and property default to being joint. That’s part of the legal joining that is a marriage.
Hopefully this just sort of happened by accident/inertia and can be fixed with conversations as Nico says.
I honestly have to wonder how much the responses here would be different if the letter writer was writing about a husband in the same position. Summer mentions 50s housewives, and I know trad wives are back in fashion, but I hope we can all agree that that kind of inequitable financial dependence is not good for anyone. And just because patriarchy can exaggerate the consequences of financial inequity in a hetero relationship doesn’t mean that it’s fine just because both people are the same gender. Really both people need savings that they can access independently as well as joint savings. And the only reason to cede all decision making about dinners, vacations, nails, etc. is if you have a conversation and it turns out that is what you both want, which does not sound like the case here.
The first letter raised a lot of alarm bells for me, and I was surprised by both of the responses essentially telling them that all of this is normal and okay. Marriage is a commitment to build a life together and to take care of each other. An arrangement where the higher earner makes all major financial decisions alone, spends money on clothes and nice things only for herself, and leaves her spouse to cover all of their own discretionary expenses on $150 a month sounds like borderline financial abuse. Not to play this card, but if a husband was treating his wife this way, the responses would probably have both been up in arms. I question the character of the wife if she’s allowing her spouse to experience this much totally unnecessary stress over money — for basic things like nice clothes! — while also controlling the shape of their lives through her income. My hope is that she’s just being thoughtless, but a conversation is definitely in order, maybe with a therapist or other third party there to keep the lower-income spouse from being steamrolled.
Financial/income/class disparity in relationships is an issue AS doesn’t do well with, despite its many other strengths. This isn’t the first time I’ve see a question like this receive answers that gave the wealthier partner way too much benefit of the doubt. It’s also telling that this question was first answered by someone with experience as the higher earner; these questions should be answered from the perspective of the more marginalized partner. Wealthier partners tend to be judged for intention rather than impact, even with little evidence of good intention.
If LW1 was married to a man and sent this letter to a non-conservative women’s magazine, they would be telling her that her husband is exploiting the power that comes with a higher income and failing to treat her equitably.
This is a big problem with queer people of all genders/sexualities; income disparity and the power it creates are swept under the rug even as people rightfully take partners to task over other forms of power imbalance.
While many straight men are the worst, they’re at least raised to expect some sense of financial responsibility in marriage for wives who don’t make as much money. I am embarrassed to admit that of all the income gap relationships I have witnessed/experienced, the higher earning sapphics have done far worse than straight men at fostering equity.
Speaking as the person who makes more money than my partner (we’re married). No that’s not normal for one person to make all the decisions and I really hope the OP can have a conversation and move towards a more equitable situation with her finances. To give an example: we have a joint account which we both contribute into and we can both spend from. That way my partner has comfortable spending money as well without feeling like they have to ask me for each thing.
It seems like the first answer to the first question is maybe applying personal experience in the early months/years of dating to long-term financial planning and decision-making in a marriage and I’d like to politely suggest that is deeply unwise. I think the point in the second answer that “I don’t have any savings, she manages the savings for the family!” doesn’t add up is key. I have to agree with the other commenters, unless you are a mob wife in a movie, nope, this is not normal and is pretty concerning!
LW, please ask yourself things like: if nothing changes, will I be OK in retirement regardless of someone else’s mood? If we divorce at 50, will I wish I had done anything differently? Does this decision-making reflect my values? What am I holding back on saying because I am performing gratitude? Does this impact division of household labor? What level of spending and saving would I be aiming for if I were unpartnered? Do I know the full financial picture or perhaps am I indeed a mob wife? (kidding) How does this dynamic influence the big picture conversations about goals? Are there other conversations that are overdue?
It’s goofy but a starting point could be to look up lists of pre-marital topics to cover. Think alone and together about the life you want to build and how you want to imagine it into existence together! It could be fun to get to know each other again and you may discover you’re each making faulty assumptions about the other person’s thoughts. But however you approach it, please don’t stay in this extremely precarious position indefinitely.