Q:
So I (20F) have been identifying as bi since I was 18, but I’m really confused about attraction and the types and what it means for my sexuality. Here are the things I’ve heard that confuse me, especially when put together:
–A woman can have sexual fantasies about women without being gay/bi (from psychology websites about the meaning of fantasies)
–Thinking a woman is pretty is aesthetic attraction, and does not mean that you are gay/bi (frequently in online queer discourse)
So what tf actually makes you gay/bi?!
I think that being in a relationship with a woman sounds amazing, and I really want to date a woman, hold hands with a woman, kiss a woman, marry a woman etc, and I could see myself doing the same thing with guys too. I really crave a romantic relationship, especially with a woman. Does that make me bi? What if I just want it because I want to belong in the queer community? I think I want it because I really do want to date a woman, but what if its just wanting to belong?
Here’s the big issue- I don’t have a specific woman I want these things with. According to definitions of aesthetic attraction, all of the things I thought were crushes might be aesthetic attraction instead. I feel an “ooh” or a “whoa” feeling, but I don’t necessarily want to have sex with that specific person yet. If aesthetic attraction doesn’t mean you’re queer/into them and romantic attraction needs to know and fall in love with the person, how does anyone find a date, especially on a dating app? Does everybody want to have sex with the people they ask out (sexual attraction)? Do people just go off the aesthetic and see if the romantic clicks?
The girl I thought was my bi awakening- I thought I was bi because I thought she was really pretty and I got nervous around her, I was scared to talk to her but I also really wanted her to notice me, and I wished I was brave enough to do something about it (our proximity ended before I could work up the courage to do more than compliment her headband, and in retrospect I don’t actually know if I wanted to ask her out or not or what- I was really confused about very new feelings).
But I barely spoke to her, I didn’t know anything about her, so it can’t have been romantic attraction, right? Was it just aesthetic and meaningless? Was it sexual? Was I projecting a general desire to be queer onto her, somehow? Especially since the idea that I could be bi came because I read something that said it didn’t have to be 50/50 and I was like huh, what about that girl I thought was really really beautiful and wanted to tell her she was beautiful, and then I saw her again while questioning if I had been attracted to her and I felt the things I said above? And then I started noticing women everywhere and feeling attracted to women celebrities, attraction I now think might have been just aesthetic, although maybe sometimes sexual.
And my attraction to guys is like this too- what I had been considering crushes before is pretty much “ooh he has nice eyes, maybe I should talk to him, perhaps this could go somewhere”. What does that mean? Aesthetic? Romantic? Sexual? I’m so confused.
And the one thing that made me sure I was bi, even with that romantic v aesthetic confusion, was that I have sexual fantasies about women, and that I can feel turned on looking at music videos with sexy women. I also sometimes think I’m feeling sexual attraction for fictional/sexually depicted/revealingly dressed men and women. But if you can have fantasies about women and not be bi/gay then that doesn’t help. Also since my fantasies are a bit bdsm, what if its the loss of power that I find sexy and not the woman? I’m also scared to try fantasies with men because I’m worried they will be stronger and it’ll prove I’m not bi. Also I don’t really love the idea of feeling powerless with a guy, even in a fantasy because it reminds me of my real powerlessness should a guy actually want to harm me. I’m more dominant in my fantasies about guys, when I do explore them, which is rarely.
I’m a virgin btw, if this post didn’t make that painfully obvious. I’ve never even kissed anyone. I also went to online high school and I don’t have a lot of social experience. But I don’t want to date a woman until I’m sure I won’t be the bisexual stereotype who leaves for a man and breaks a lesbian’s heart. And I don’t want to just hook up with someone to see if the sex works because I really value an emotional/romantic connection first- what I crave isn’t the sex its the romance. I want to buy a girl flowers, take her out on a date, have the storybook love but gay. But I can’t do that until I know I’m not wrong about my sexuality.
I really want to be bi. I want to end up with a woman, but do I just want that to be queer? Also if I’m not bi I’d have to come out all over again and stop displaying all of my amazing bi stuff and stop going to pride wearing my bi colors and that makes me really sad.
A:
I always know it’s going to be a fun one when the initial letter I’m working with is about the length of my response to it.
Hi OP. Firstly, I’d like to formally welcome you to the disreputable club that we all inhabit: the Gays. If you want a different induction, then I can diagnose you with Gay. You don’t get a sick note, but you can start telling people you have it.
Now that I’ve handled the conclusion, I’ll show my working.
I can’t address all of your points like I normally would because there are just so many. I think that the amount of thought you’ve put into the topic and how many insightful angles you’re taking are evidence that you’re queer-leaning. A fully heterosexual person wouldn’t have this many questions. As I was told when I began heavily questioning my assigned gender, cis people don’t think this hard about this stuff. They exist without having to care about it.
Aesthetic attraction and fantasy
While I do believe that it’s possible to be attracted to someone’s pleasing appearance without your sexual orientation being affected, human attraction doesn’t conform to literary definitions. Attraction is infamously fickle and inconsistent. There are women who only make out with other women after a few drinks. There are men who have sex with men and maintain their heterosexual self-identification because they’re the penetrating partner.
If you only had occasional daydreams or thought other women were hot and left it there, I might call it an experimental thread. Something for you to tug on or leave as you wish. But it’s not just that. That whole list of things you want with a woman: dating, holding hands, kissing, marriage? That is categorically un-heterosexual. Equally telling is that your interest in those experiences is shared with men. It doesn’t have to be to the same intensity but uh, willing to consider marriage with a gender is usually considered an attraction to that gender.
Fantasies and aesthetic attraction are a point of first contact for your brain that nudges you to action. For most allosexuals (those who experience significant sexual attraction), it’s an aesthetic attraction, fantasy formation, or some other invisible ‘pull’. People can also be drawn to other aspects they see in someone. Sapiosexuals are drawn to mental stimulation and perceived intelligence. Gynosexuality describes an attraction to feminine expression irrespective of other characteristics like gender identity or anatomy. What gynosexual, sapiosexual, and ooh-they’re-hot attraction all have in common is that they’re the primary criterion that causes initial attraction. None of them are better or worse. They catch our interest and may be necessary to keep our interest.
I can’t peer into your brain to know how your romantic fantasies and attraction pair with the way attraction forms. What you’ve described just sounds… ordinary. Being into people you find attractive and daydreaming about them is just completely fine. I just think it means you’re attracted to those people. And if you can find the specific characteristics that tie all of your attractions together, it’ll make it easier to label yourself. Speaking of which…
Label panic
You’re far from the first person to ask us about your labels and self-identification. Since people are presumed cisgender and heterosexual until they change course, almost every queer person has had to contend with their self-identification. Given the diversity of queer experience and our individually colourful responses to introspection… yeah. Everyone reacts differently to the prospect of changing labels. Most people are nervous about getting it ‘right’. Some people just throw their hands in the air and say gay. Some people make lists and interview their friends about it. I love labels and definitions, so I went through all of the variants I just listed. There are countless others.
But the thing about self-identification is that it’s only worth doing if it benefits you. Otherwise it’s stress.
If the re-labelling endeavor destabilizes you while providing zero answers, there’s nothing wrong with not having a clear label for a while. Unless that is more stressful than just going through the re-labelling. I empathize with that.
The differences and interlinks between sex and gender also complicate the process. As an example, once I began thinking that I might be trans, I developed certainty in it very quickly. It took me weeks to be dead set on that idea that I’m transgender and I have not deviated once. Other trans people question their trans-ness and whether they’re a good fit for it for their whole lives. People can question their trans-ness while being the most trans bitch ever.
But where I don’t have certainty is sexuality. I was assigned heterosexual (and male [ew.]) at birth. That was congruent with my life until I transitioned and since the English sexuality labels are tied to the speaker’s gender, I had to change my sexuality label to lesbian/sapphic, because I changed my gender label and that had a domino effect. This happened even though the way I experience attraction to women didn’t change one bit.
But I experimented with men when I still lived as a man? But I was exclusively the receiving partner in sex with men. So like you, there’s a gender dynamic at play that opens more questions. Post-transition, I love women and everything about us. I’m also sexually attracted to men. I’d just never form a committed relationship with one. I use the bisexual label because I’m sexually attracted to two+ genders, but I tack on a little homoromantic label to signal that I’m only interested in forming committed relationships with women.
But I also like hot queer people of various kinds? In various contexts? And how do I reconcile all of this with the fact that in bed, I’m exclusively submissive to men, switchy with women, and everyone else is just vibes based? How do I handle any of this?
Easy.
Life got much easier when I learned I could keep a bunch of labels/self-identities in my pocket and swap them out as necessary.
I tell queer people I’m trans and capital-G Gay. My fellow queers know what it’s like to eventually just throw your hands in the air and call yourself gay so you can move on with life.
When I’m interviewing for a job, they get my name and face. They can figure the rest out themselves.
The people I encounter in my daily life who I presume are cis-het? They get the name and appearance. If it’s relevant, I might call myself bi. I’m known as an ardent lesbian among close friends and not interested to any man who tries to talk to me.
My dating profiles make it clear that I’m trans, and if I swiped on you or messaged, I’m into you.
Honourable mentions for sapphic and bisexual-homoromantic. Reserved only for people who know what they mean.
Is that a lot of labels for one person? Yeah. Aren’t some of them a little contradictory? Also yeah. But I’m a hot, traditionally feminine woman with erectile dysfunction. If I can live my labels but they’re contradictory, that just sounds like my existence exposes the shortcomings of the language we use to label ourselves. I’m too cool to be consistent. Consistency is for porridge.
Coda
I think I’ve covered the essentials. I can contribute a few things that’ll help or ease your process. That stuff about only labelling if it’s important and beneficial to you. And how attraction is just as much a marker of, well, attraction as it can exist independently of intense interest. Here are a few other remarks from my reading of your words.
- It’s completely fine to have gender and power dynamics in your sexual fantasies and how you experience attraction. Very, very few people can truly treat everyone ‘equally’. It’s far more useful to recognise where your differences and inequalities are and work with them.
- You’re still new to this exploration and there’s a lifetime of chances ahead to rework your expectations. Given time, you may find that some of these questions become trivial or irrelevant while new ones show up. What matters is that you pursue your needs with care for yourself and others.
- It’s very, very, very gay to want a ‘storybook’ romance with women. And if you also have that feeling toward men too, you’re at least bi.
- It’s also very gay to worry about breaking a hypothetical lesbian’s heart because you left her for a hypothetical man. Heterosexual people don’t worry about stuff like that because the prospect of being with a same-sex partner isn’t even on their radar.
- It’s super gay or bi (in your case) to be this attracted to women. If you were fully heterosexual, your attraction to women would be about on par with your attraction to white hair in front of a green screen. Or a desk chair. Not repulsed by the thought. Not romantically interested in it either. Just… nonexistent.
I wrote this recently for another person, but I’ll also write it for you too:
If introspection about your identity ever feels overwhelming, please remember that being ‘gay’ or ‘bisexual’ or anything isn’t some prestigious club. No club that would have me could possibly be that great. The entry requirement is basically to have a pulse and plenty of people enter through the revolving door, get one look at the room and leave.
hi lw!! I want to point out that the distinction between different types of attraction, especially separating sexual & romantic attraction from aesthetic & sensual, originated from (as far as I know) and is mostly useful to aromantic- and asexual-spectrum folks, who often need or at least find it useful to parse out what’s going on with their relationships in a LOT more detail, and using a LOT more boxes, than everyone else. outside the aspec experience of trying to articulate (and, often, defend) what we do and don’t want, I’m not sure that the hyperspecific differentiation between different kinds of attraction is doing more good than harm. Yes, fantasies don’t inherently reflect real-life desires, and yes, it is possible to appreciate how a person looks and not want to actually have sex with them, but both of those ideas are fundamentally “defensive,” for lack of a better word. Lots of people DO fantasize about things they want to do in real life (and it’s hard to tell the difference without trying), and those people don’t need to get their real-life desires from somewhere else for them to count as Legitimate Desires. Lots of people DO appreciate how a person looks And Also want to have sex with them, and for those people there’s no point trying to differentiate the two. these are ace&arospec ideas!
Said with absolutely nothing but warmth this letter has a very similar vibe to taking an ‘am I gay quiz’ with the shtick being that only queer people genuinely take the ‘am I gay quiz’! On account of your lack of experience (and at risk of telling you something you already know) regardless of the gender of the person you first kiss, if you kiss someone and aren’t immediately feeling butterflies or whatever that could be because you aren’t attracted to them specifically or it could be that you’re not yet comfortable with them as an individual- this is to say, try not to extrapolate your greater feelings about an entire gender from an encounter with a single person? Figuring yourself out takes time! Also, it’s ok to go on a date with a person even if you’re not 100% sure you’re attracted to their entire class of gender- so long as you’re going on a date with them because you want to go on a date with them and not because you view them as an experiment it’s no different then going on a first date with anyone! You can know for sure that you’re attracted to a gender and still go on a date with a person of that gender and find that you’re not attracted to them as an individual. Be kind to yourself, try not to put too much pressure on individual experiences, and have fun! (Or try to)
Just going to drop in the possibility of sexual orientation OCD – I would suggest reading about it and see if it resonates!
Agreed! OCD is not always about germs or contamination. It can have lots of different themes!
Yes to everything Summer said, as well as what Mo said above (especially about individual attraction. I have dated and kissed many people of many genders who, it turns out, I’m not attracted to. Doesn’t mean I’m not bi.)
I also want to add (as A Bisexual) that what I’m hearing from you sounds a like you may have unconsciously absorbed a lot of what a biphobic society will tell us about ourselves. Biphobia can come from without or within the queer community and often centers on ideas that we’re “confused” or “faking it for attention” or “leading people on.” None of that is true about bisexuality as an identity (although of course any of it can be true about an individual), and it is SO common for bi/pan spectrum folks to go through a lot of the same questions and self-doubts that you’re describing here. So please cut yourself some slack and give yourself some grace while you work through this, because the influence of biphobia (or transphobia or homophobia or whatever phobia pertains to someone’s identity) on our sense of self can be a lot to unpack.
But also, as A Bisexual, everything you’re describing sounds bi as hell, from wanting to marry a woman to being very attached to our flag.
Love and agree with 99% of this but I want to respectfully push back on one point: “everything you’re describing sounds bi as hell, [including] being very attached to our flag.” Just want to throw this out there for the letter writer and similar: I think a big part of what’s caused the extreme confusion and extensive identity and label exploration that has become more popular in a post-masterdoc, post-tiktok world is conflation of sexual orientations with subcultures, aesthetics, and other shallow, image-based things that just aren’t relevant to sexuality, and people get lost in all the chaff when all it really comes down to is if you’re attracted to both men and women (bisexual) or only women (lesbian).
There are a lot of questions in the letter that I think are totally reasonable things for a young and virginal woman to grapple with, such as “does everyone instantly wanna fuck anyone they ask out?” (no, you can date someone to get to know them better) and “could I still be attracted to women even if I haven’t had a crush yet?” (yes, everyone has to have their first crush at some point in their lives, and it can be hard to find a woman you vibe with enough to crush on because most people are straight and straight women are extremely unattractive–at least to me, with the lack of sexual chemistry and all). But there’s one question that kind of disturbs me and I’ve seen a huge uptick in this type of logic in the past couple of years that I never saw in the ‘questioning’ livejournal and xanga posts my high school classmates used to make when I was a teenager years ago:
“What if I just want it because I want to belong in the queer community? I think I want it because I really do want to date a woman, but what if its just wanting to belong?”
Well, I mean… if you were pretending to like women because you wanted to belong to the queer community, then you’d know you were pretending, because you’d be experiencing those emotions and desires in your heart and mind. People usually know when they’re lying about something! People tell lies consciously, on purpose! And people usually know when they want something! They might have a hard time admitting it, or acting on it, but you know you want something (or someone) when you feel a desire for that something (or someone)!
I feel like that stupid, evil, cursed “lesbian/comphet masterdoc” has done immeasurable damage to queer women’s sense of competence and agency and capacity for self-knowledge because it’s completely normalized the notion that you can’t trust your own thoughts, feelings, or desires, which, to be frank, feels like a complete fabrication about human psychology on par with the concept of suppressed childhood memories of participation in satanic rituals. You should not be so alienated from your own thoughts and desires that you can’t eat a slice of cake without wondering “well, I think that I think that I think this tastes good, but maybe I secretly hate cake and I just don’t know it yet??” This is the exact opposite of what true self exploration entails, which is learning to trust the signals that your body and mind are sending you about what you want.