Are Columbia’s New Co-Ed Dorm Rooms Good for The Gays?

DORMING: Columbia will implement a gender-neutral housing policy for upperclassmen: To clarify; the dorms are already co-ed, but the rooms themselves are not. This will enable girls and boys to share rooms.88624158 “Gay and lesbian student groups told the paper they support the move. But opponents tell the Post that arguments between young couples living together could be a disaster to other dorm residents.”

[Riese sidenote: True ‘dat … BUT, one must consider that NYC college students remain in on-campus student housing longer than kids at state schools, so therefore are less likely to do what many students already do do sophomore year, which is live with their significant other in their own apartment.

Dr. Ruth points out, “If a coed has a boy friend on campus who ends up practically living in her room, her roommate is forced into the awkward situation of having a second roommate of the opposite sex so by allowing couples to room together, Columbia is acknowledging a reality and protecting single roommates from having to share their rooms with couples.”200395578-001

According to The Post, ‘gay and lesbian student groups support the move’ because gay students don’t always feel comfortable with a same-sex roommate. Columbia is a super gay-friendly campus, and sticking gay students with each other seems a bit ghetto-izing, but perhaps that’s not what they mean — I do like the anecdote about the gay guy + his female straight BFF who are gonna shack up next year. What do you think? Similar rooming policies have been enacted already at over 30 other schools including the University of Chicago. At Wesleyan, “once you actually live in it, it doesn’t actually turn into a big deal.” (This USA Today article actually has a pretty interesting look at the issue).

According to asylum.com, Columbia is already in trouble for having co-ed dorms to begin with because college students assigned to coed dorms drink more, have more sex and watch more pornography than those living in single-sex housing. HOLLER!

What do you think? And since lesbians have been able to room with their girlfriends since the invention of Smith, have any of you made the choice to share a dorm with a girlfriend and lived to tell the tale?

GLAMBERT: ABC has now invited Adam Lambert to perform on The View. Just like your ex-girlfriend, these bitches just cannot make up their minds how they feel.

CONVERSION: We’re including this man’s account of infiltrating the world of Christian gay-conversion therapy in the Sunday Funday fix because we hope you will be able to find it genuinely hilarious that anyone thinks this could ever possibly work. “It starts out with these odd exercises meant to confront how you feel about men. For one exercise, you’re standing just inches away from another man and you’re staring him in the eyes, and someone in the background is telling you to think about what emotions come up. You do this with every man at the camp. It is very uncomfortable.” (@alternet.org)

GLENN BECK: Much in the same vein, we hope you are able to appreciate Slate’s review of Glenn Beck’s new one-man show based on his novel The Christmas Sweater in the same way we were. Here’s a little bit of a spoiler: yes, it does contain the phrase “the true meaning of Christmas.” “Beck briefly seethed at himself in remembering a personal low point defined by doing his Christmas shopping at a chain drugstore. He misted up in explaining that his inspiration for The Christmas Sweater was the last Yuletide of his mother’s life. Beck breathed deeply and introduced complete film footage of the one-man show. Here, throwing himself into the performance Anna Deavere Smith-style, Beck employed a distinct voice for each of the five central characters, reserving his own for narration. Thrusting and leaping around the stage with gusto, he sweated through two layers of T-shirt and made copious use of the kneepads bulging beneath his trousers.” (@slate)

The actual promotional material for this event from Glenn Beck’s website

EPISCOPALIANS: If approved, Rev. Mary Glasspool will become the Episcopal Church’s second openly gay bishop, and its first lesbian one. “She decided to become a candidate for the Los Angeles because she believed it was time “for our wonderful church to move on and be the inclusive church we say we are.” (@advocate)

DISNEY: “Hyped as offering the Walt Disney corporation’s first African-American animated heroine, The Princess and the Frog actually refrains from expanding our social imagination.” Do you have feelings about Disney’s new movie The Princess and the Frog? This guy at the New York Press does! If you like your movie reviews to use words like “post-racial complaisance,” “corporate responsibility,” and “slick evocation of Hurricane Katrina guilt,” you might like to read about it. (@nypress)

RIHANNA: If you’ve thought that “Rihanna wardrobe malfunction while dressed as sexy military Mickey mouse” could only happen in your dreams, you’re not alone. But luckily, we were all wrong! Michelle Collins reports, and also asks the question that was probably meant to be a joke but I am actually curious to know the answer to: “Will ABC now cancel all of Rihanna’s upcoming appearances?” Also, along with photos of Rihanna wearing nothing but a bra made out of bullets and a Mickey helmet, we are given the fabulous graphic below of the sexiest man of 2009. Feel free to make it your desktop while reliving Autostraddle’s response to his AMA performance! (@bestweekever)

DATABASE: What’s your favorite part of this article about how the UK is building a database of sexual identity? Is it the fact that they’re calling it a ‘Lifestyle Database’? Is it that they use scare quotes when asking whether “straight or gay citizens suffer greater ‘inequality’?” Is it that none of the people whose information is being used were informed that they were participating? I can’t decide! (@carnalnation)

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Rachel

Originally from Boston, MA, Rachel now lives in the Midwest. Topics dear to her heart include bisexuality, The X-Files and tacos. Her favorite Ciara video is probably "Ride," but if you're only going to watch one, she recommends "Like A Boy." You can follow her on twitter and instagram.

Rachel has written 1142 articles for us.

16 Comments

  1. “college students assigned to coed dorms drink more, have more sex and watch more pornography than those living in single-sex housing.”
    I think there are many girls at Barnard who would disagree with this statement.
    I personally think gender neutral housing is awesome and I’m glad Columbia is going through with it!

    • Yeah, I had couple of friends who went to Barnard and one of them told me that every time there was a fire alarm/drill in the middle of the night, there would almost always be a lot of dudes standing around in their jammies with all the ladies. Heh heh.

      • Sorry all I ever do is talk about my school, but we’ve had this exact housing policy for a year now and it wasn’t really news like at all. I’m reporting from the future, Columbia, and everything turns out fine!

        • I should note, for the sake of accuracy, that I’m an old lady and this was all about ten years ago.

        • yeah, same with nyu as far as i remember. it was optional and only implemented at some dorms “on campus” i.e. in the financial district

        • I’m glad you gave us this report. I guess this means it’s time for you to go BACK TO THE FUTURE!

  2. Oh man, we quote Dr. Ruth! I once had dinner with her in San Francisco. She’s so feisty. I think she makes a good point though; that happened to a couple friends of mine in the dorms. It was really awkward. So I say yay for this housing policy!

    re: the conversion article, “someone in the background is telling you to think about what emotions come up.” Come up? See what they did there? I wonder if that was intentional.

  3. Completely off topic, but I just saw Lady Gaga on the X Factor dancing in a giant bath-tub dressed as the robot devil….. amazing….

  4. I didn’t know anything about this database thing (thanks for the heads up) so was super angry at first! But after reading the article about it in the Daily Mail I went and had a look at the Equality & Human Rights Commission website to check and I’m less pissed off. I’m pretty sure the scarequotes and calling it a Lifestyle survey is just the Daily Mail (not surprising, as they are conservative bastards) but the EHRC paper I read about it is a lot more intelligent. I still have a lot of feelings about it, but its not as dramatic as I thought and isn’t really that different from the ways which our data about other things is used/collected by the government at the moment, most of which is already available. (Some people have a lot of concerns about the level of privacy in this respect in the UK at the moment). I’m not really convinced of the statistical value of it though, but the govt loves comissioning nationwide surveys! I think the Daily Mail is just scaremongering as per, it makes me sad and mad.

    • Thanks for clarifying some of that! Clearly I didn’t research it very hard. I have a lot of feelings about it as well; like, I am kind of made uncomfortable by the fact that this exists, but I also would love to have more hard statistics/proof about our community. I don’t know! Thank you for sharing!

  5. The Daily Mail has a real nerve putting inequality in quotes when their entire newspaper is dedicated to actively encouraging discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, and social class. Even for such a hate-filled paper it takes some twisting to see the negative in gathering information so it can be used to provide better, more inclusive, healthcare and police services. No-one is being forced to provide any information, and there’s no way of identifying individuals on the database. If you don’t want to tick the box, don’t tick the box.

    (By the way thanks for not linking the original Mail article, looking at it on the website made my blood boil. Sample side link: “Why ladies make truly lousy bosses: We’re moody, indecisive and always trying to behave like a man.” ARGH. So much wrong in so few words)

  6. I think co-ed dorms are a great option, for the gays, for the straights, for the everyone between. And you too asexuals.
    %30 increase in awesome for the win.

    That conversion therapy article gave me the sads, especially when it got to the part about the man re-enacting beating his father with a baseball bat.

    And I think that the sexual identity database would be a great idea if they weren’t using names (especially without real consent.) If they take away names it couldprovide really usefull information without compromising privacy.

  7. I chose to live in a girls’ only dorm my freshman year at college. That should have been my first clue but no – it took me two more years to come out.

  8. I have a Public Service Announcement: freshman year lezzie lovebirds at a women’s college rooming together sophomore year = horrible idea. HORRIBLE. IDEA.

    You’re welcome.

Comments are closed.