The World's Most Popular Independently-Owned Website for Lesbian, Bisexual and Queer Women
Leave a Comment

//

92 Comments

Could Fox News Go Down With the Rest of Rupert Murdoch's Empire?

Rose

Posted by

If you've watched or read news other than Autostraddle lately, you have probably heard at least a little of what is going on with Rupert Murdoch and the News of the World (NoW). The British tabloid published its last issue on July 10th, amidst allegations of phone-hacking and resignations of various important people formerly associated with the paper. The scandal has touched everyone from the Prime Minister (whose communications director, Andy Coulson, is a former NoW reporter associated with the hacking) to Scotland Yard (which also employed a former NoW reporter, Neil Wallis). As the UK branch of Murdoch's media empire collapses, Americans can't help but wonder: what would happen if hacking surfaces over here, too? Could it mean the end of Murdoch's enterprises here -- like, oh, I don't know, FOX News? Well, hang on to your hats, everyone, because we may soon find out!

The hacking scandal -- which in Britain, touched everyone from the royal family to murdered teenager Milly Dowler -- is trickling across the ocean, starting with one of Britain's own: Jude Law. Reports have surfaced alleging that the actor's phone was hacked into while he was at JFK Airport in New York, and the information discovered was used to inform a 2003 News of the World story. Sienna Miller, Law's ex-fiancée, was also impacted by the NoW hackings in the U.K.; the High Court ordered NoW to pay her ₤10,000 in damages. However, because the hacking of Law's phone happened on American shores while he was using an American phone network, it becomes the U.S.A.'s problem, opening up a brand new can of worms. The FBI has contacted Law for more information about the hacking. And it's becoming clearer and clearer that just as in the UK, famous actors are only the beginning of News Corp's victims in the U.S.

via Wikipedia

As the FBI moves forward with its investigation of possible hackings in the U.S. (with the urgings of several members of Congress), more and more appalling information has surfaced: namely, that families of 9-11 victims may have been among those hacked by News Corp journalists. 10 years later, America still hasn't fully recovered from the September 11th attacks, and regardless, its victims and their families remain sacred cows. So if reports of 9-11 victim hackings turn out to be true, it could spark outrage similar to that over the hacking of Milly Dowler's voicemail in Britain -- and could spell death for at least some of Murdoch's media properties in the U.S. Megan Carpentier puts it as bluntly as possible in her Guardian article titled "If News Corp hacked the phones of 9/11 families, Fox News is finished." Obviously, an end to FOX News would be great news for feminists, queers, liberals and other groups regularly demonized by the various FOX talking heads.

But it's not time to break out the champagne glasses yet; many more think reports of News Corp's total death are premature. And even if that was the end result, it's unlikely to happen overnight. That doesn't keep everyone from speculating, though, as to whether News of the World is alone among Murdoch properties in its depravity. Launce Rake of The Nevada View sees NoW as part of a "culture of corruption" in Murdoch's media empire, connected to FOX's horribly skewed reporting. Former FOX News executive Dan Cooper has come forward claiming that the channel had a "black ops" department which "ran counter-intelligence" on their competitors: "Most people thought it was simply the research department of Fox News…I knew it also housed a counter intelligence and black ops office. So accessing phone records was easy as pie…It was staffed by 15 researchers and had a guard at the door. No one working there would engage in conversation." Another anonymous former FOX executive described the conditions for staff there as like "Russia at the height of the Soviet era."

via The Guardian

Perhaps the scariest part of the whole ordeal is the perceived consequences for those brave enough to speak out. Cooper reported in the above article that he has already been threatened for going to the media about the FOX News "black ops." And tragically, News of the World whistleblower Sean Hoare was found dead in his home in Watford, Hertfordshire on July 18, though it's still unknown if his death was related to the investigation and Hertfordshire police have claimed that it is "not thought to be suspicious."

If you want to read more about the News Corp hacking scandal and its possible endgames, BBC News has a timeline of events so far and The Atlantic has a list of possible outcomes of a U.S. investigation. For some particularly interesting takes on the story: Ian Jack at The Guardian compares Murdoch to Citizen Kane, and Michelle Chen at In These Times wonders what this all means for the future of journalism.

Last but certainly not least, MoveOn.org has a petition pushing for a full U.S. investigation of the Murdoch empire's shady dealings; sign it here.

92 responses to “Could Fox News Go Down With the Rest of Rupert Murdoch's Empire?”

  1. e

    oh that would be amaaaazing. especially since fox news seems to be the only channel my gynecologist makes available in the waiting room.

    Thumb up 0
  2. Lex Morgan

    Dear god, I hope this is the death knell of that hellhole they try to pass off as journalism.

    Thumb up 0
  3. lilyv

    rupert murdoch, fox news, and the news of the world have dragged journalism into a dark slimy ally and nearly beat it to a pulp with all the crap they try to pass of as news. it just keeps surprising me how many people they have taken down with them (including the police). someone get marisa over here because this shit is crazy!

    Thumb up 0
    1. allie

      murdoch= deb

      Thumb up 0
  4. vincent

    Wow alot of hatred on Fox News for telling things through the viewpoint of the majority of the American public. Most Americans are center-right leaning by nature. Only 7% of people consider themselves liberal. Thankfully.

    Watch the O’Reilly Factor and you will see he is pretty harsh towards the Tea Party movement. You have MSNBC, CNN and all the prime time news channels that look at things from the left. I would rather be flayed alive than watch that stuff, but I respect their right to opinion. That same respect is not given to Conservatives and to be honest its a shame.

    To sum it up and answer your question….NO, Fox News is not going anywhere. Their prime time ratings are higher than all the other cable news channels combined. You can look it up if you dont believe me. Dont try to silence people just because they disagree with you politically. Variety is a good thing

    Thumb up 0
    1. Paper0Flowers

      It’s a shame your supposed “majority of American public” can’t give the “minority” any respect either, because, face it, the only reason someone of your politics is here on this website is to troll and piss on the opposing point of view.

      Until Fox News starts treating *US* with respect, then, well, maybe neither side will have reason to complain about the animosity. That’s not going to happen though as long as people with your political stance continue boohooing over nothing.

      Thumb up 0
    2. The Almighty

      Lol.

      When you’re ready to face reality, the door is open.

      Thumb up 0
    3. lilyv

      fox news viewers are also the most ill informed viewers (you can actually look that up to). the problem that i have with fox is that they pass opinions and distorted stories off as news. one small example im going to give is the whole death panel thing. are you going to tell me that was real? that wasn’t even an opinion, just a straight up lie.

      where have you been vincent? in damascus?

      Thumb up 0
    4. Evidux

      Thumb up 0
      1. Dani

        win.

        Thumb up 0
      2. allie

        oh lord. gifs can be posted?!!?!?!?!?!?1?1? the world will never be the same

        Thumb up 0
  5. Jill Kennedy

    I am surprised there are so few people standing by Rupert. You would think (outside of the newspapers that he owns that must defend him because they’re paid to) there would be more support from friends in the industry. Perhaps he doesn’t have any friends. If this was Bob Iger or Jeff Bewkes I think people would be crawling out of the woodwork to support them. So far Rupert only has Piers Morgan and Khan Manka, Jr. on his side. Pretty sad.

    http://mankabros.com/blogs/chairman/2011/07/18/in-defense-of-rupert-murdoch/

    Thumb up 0
    1. Sawyer

      Having Piers Morgan on your side seems like a death sentence to me. There’s a reason he hopped across the pond to the USA – I can’t think of a single person over here I know of who likes him (from the right-wing, e.g. my dad and the TV presenter Jeremy Clarkson; to the left-wing, i.e. pretty much everyone else I know).

      Thumb up 0
  6. LibelFreeZone

    To answer the headline question, one can only hope. All media outlets, with few exceptions, need their diapers changed.

    Thumb up 0
    1. Kels

      Totally agree. As much as I hate Fox News and their (sometimes hateful) bias, there’s just as much bias and sensationalism on other, left-leaning channels. I pretty much just stick with the News Hour with Jim Lehrer. My dad has a big fat crush on Rachel Maddow though, so I watch her show sometimes with him.

      Thumb up 0
  7. NewTexan

    Variety is a good thing. I just don’t think Fox news provides any.
    Ratings don’t mean quality, Two and a Half Men is proof enough of that.
    I don’t watch “news” in general, it is mostly all opinion pieces and not objective journalism.
    If you want to watch “news” to parrot the opinions you’ve already formed, be my guest.

    Peace

    Thumb up 0
  8. jifener25

    is there a way to sign that petition without giving them my monies? I am but a poor college student, all of my extra monies goes to autostraddle and the the feeding of my kitten.

    Thumb up 0
  9. Mornyng

    While I hope for the collapse of Rupert Murdoch’s empire, it probably won’t happen. The News Corporation has been monopolizing various media markets for decades. They have destroyed competition unfairly and saturated media outlets with mediocre, sometimes untrue, and unoriginal programming.

    The more justice Rupert Murdoch is forced to deal with, the better the world will be.

    Thumb up 0
    1. Annie D

      Yes. The Murdoch family has owned newspapers in Australia since federation and currently own 70% of the print media. It’s a real problem because the Murdoch papers here also have a distinct conservative bias — the Labour party cannot do anything right and the oddly named Liberal (read conservative) party is God’s gift to the world. Fortunately the phone hacking scandal has motivated an enquiry, but at this stage, I don’t think it will be possible to loosen Murdoch’s control.

      Thumb up 0
  10. lyn avery

    I have a degree in journalism and have worked as a writer all of my life. Fox news leans right however since every other major news station out there leans left I don’t see why everyone is so upset.

    Just because you don’t like some of the conclusions or angle they put on the news(especially if it offends your particular group mentality) does not make it wrong. We all have issues and if we are informed and feel strongly about them we should be able to tolerate opposing viewpoints to be heard.

    If worries me how many out there truly prefer that other voices be silenced, even to the tune of diminishing the first amendment. These days, political correctness, which is lying by omission, is preferred to the market place of ideas. Democracies don’t last long with that mentality.

    Personally I read news sources from all over the world to get news. If you really want the truth, you’d better close down your CNN MSNBC CBS NBC AND ABC with Fox and start looking at some objective papers from Europe, Australia, etc. at least when it comes to domestic affairs in the USA. They are far more honest about issues affecting America than our own news sources.

    Finally, when someone tells me that Fox news watchers are uniformed, and that this has been proven, my first question is how w as it proven and my second question is when were you last tested on your level of information? Grow up, stop living your lives around your personal group mentality. We have far bigger fish to fry than gay marriage, elderly rights or reparations. You cant get reparations or medicare out of a collapsed economy and who cares if you’re same sex married if there is not enough food to eat and your neighbor is coming in your back door with a gun to take what you have? What is around the corner for our nation and the world will make all of these issues look trivial.lyn

    Thumb up 0
    1. Vinny

      Funny how you use the phrase ‘lying by omission’ to deride something you don’t like, then do exactly the same thing later; specifically, the part about the economy. Your insinuation that it’s only the right wing that are trying to do anything about the economy isn’t just dishonest, it’s downright laughable. The fact that you, I assume, disagree with the method that the Democrats have suggested for dealing with the possibility of a default is irrelevant; you’re directly insinuating that they haven’t come up with ANY method whatsoever. And given that the right wing is fanatically against ANY form of tax raise no matter how dire the financial situation is, even if it comes in conjunction with large cuts in spending on the things you already mentioned like medicare (i.e. the deal that Boehnner rejected just the other day), exactly which side is clinging to that group mentality?

      Lastly, if gay marriage is no big issue, then why is the right wing spending so much time and effort to denounce and oppose it at every turn rather than concentrating on the economy?

      Thumb up 0
    2. Krystle

      Slightly inappropriate, but I totally giggled at the neighbor coming in my back door with a gun comment. One part slippery slope fear mongering hypotheticals (the end of days, I tell yah!), one part funny mental image of my neighbors – who can’t even screw in a light bulb without help or breaking the lightbulb- trying to figure out how to get into my house.

      That said, debate is awesome. However, ya gotta let the person you’re debating actually make a point and be able to speak for themselves… something that many tv and radio news organizations – regardless of political bent – do. There’s also an extreme lack of understanding or talk of the socio-economic historical context of, well, every issue. Part of good reporting is to contextualize, and PART of that contextualization is opinion. A GOOD opinion is one with a strong, well-argued, well-thought out, well-presented foundation based on research (academics, scholars, etc.), history, sociology, science, etc. I have come across many GOOD conservative opinions… just very rarely on Fox news *shrug* (mostly from conversing with friends. We agree on what a problem IS, but completely diverge on how to “fix” the problem… even specific ones, local government ones).

      Anyways, as journalists, they (news broadcasters) have a civil duty – and with duty comes ethics – to do their best not to deceive their viewers, much less purposefully distort things that are matters of fact (and there are facts, and if there are facts that are contradictory…well..one has to be right and the other wrong IF THEY ARE LOGICALLY CONTRADICTORY, so present BOTH and let the VIEWER DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES.) to sway opinion. *shrug*

      Thumb up 0
    3. Cat

      Does it actually need to be pointed out the Rupert Murdoch IS Australian? He owns most of our media too… if you’re after ‘some objective papers’ you’re looking at the wrong country sweets.

      Thumb up 0
  11. lyn avery

    P.S. My observation is that the people who cant stand to even hear the opposition speak are people who are often not well informed on the issues and therefore they choose censorship over debate.

    Thumb up 0
  12. lyn avery

    SOROS FUNDED UNIVERSITY POLL SAYS FOX NEWS VIEWERS MOST ‘MISINFORMED’ POLITICALLY

    Anyone who knows who George SDorsos is and how he hates Fox news and this country will not need an explanation of this.

    Hey you are funny too. As I said , if you want to know the truth dont read this kind of propaganda and find out where it comes from. Even looking at how the study was allegedly performed should tell anyone with an average IQ that it is flawed.

    Thumb up 0
    1. lilyv

      you’re right lyn…..i have been so damn missed informed my whole hillbilly life and can never hope to have a higher iq score than a shovel. i’m going to ride my unicorn over to europe and australia and get me some book lernin and i’ll only watch faux news aka the truth channel. how could i have been fooled by that sneaky fox soros damn him and the liberal media. thank you for opening my blind eyes oh great one.

      Thumb up 0
      1. lilyv
        1. allie

          omg the rainbow tears jpeg….i died.

          Thumb up 0
      2. Paper0Flowers

        I love you, Lily.

        Thumb up 0
        1. prolittering

          Why, you three-timing little…

          Thumb up 0
          1. Paper0Flowers

            …shit. =\

            Thumb up 0
            1. prolittering

              Quite.

              Thumb up 0
          2. lilyv

            wait….i thought it was okay…… YOU SAID IT WAS OKAY!!!!

            Thumb up 0
            1. Paper0Flowers

              DAMNIT LILY YOU ARE NOT HELPING.

              Thumb up 0
            2. lilyv

              hey it’s not my fault you can’t control yourself around girls who “sleep” with their eyes closed while they get their picture taken

              Thumb up 0
            3. Evidux

              A+ Would lollerskate again.

              Thumb up 0
            4. Paper0Flowers

              Now you’re making me sound even creepier than I already am.

              Thumb up 0
  13. Emma

    “who cares if you’re same sex married if there is not enough food to eat and your neighbor is coming in your back door with a gun to take what you have?”
    lol alrighty then

    Thumb up 0
  14. lyn

    Vinny You disappoint me, I thought because you were attempting a debate it would be somewhat based on fact not assumptions.Twice you say I insinuated when I did not and you say once that I assumed once something I did not. I said that political correctness is lying by omission.It is because when PC is the controlling issue, so much goes unsaid so as not to offend anyone that the debate is never held. As for me lying by omission regarding the economy, that does not make sense. I dont recall even mentioning either of the two parties. You made that assumption. In fact you made so many assumptions that I lost the connection between what I said and your response. This is why we need to bring High School debate class back.

    as for same sex marriage, I believe consenting adults should be free to do whatever in their own bedrooms. I also believe that adults have the right to teach their children their beliefs about moral issues without being told by the state or gay and lesbians what out kids need to believe.Therefore gays and lesbians need to get their indoctrination classes out of the public schools.Its an fair trade I believe.

    Thumb up 0
    1. Vinny

      Actually, I’m a long-term University debater. And if you didn’t insinuate any such thing, then pray tell, what was this all about?

      “We have far bigger fish to fry than gay marriage, elderly rights or reparations. You cant get reparations or medicare out of a collapsed economy and who cares if you’re same sex married if there is not enough food to eat and your neighbor is coming in your back door with a gun to take what you have? What is around the corner for our nation and the world will make all of these issues look trivial.”

      If you had just stuck to gay marriage, you would be able to say you were responding to the people on this website in particular; bringing in medicare, reparations and elderly rights, when no-one on this page had mentioned those topics up to that point, shows it was a direct statement about left-wing politics, and an insinuation that the left-wing doesn’t care about the economy at all. And no, you didn’t mention the two parties at that point, but you were sure as hell making a statement about left vs right, and by extension the parties themselves given that the elderly rights and medicare topics have been directly involved in the debate around the default.

      And I never said you assumed anything, by the way. If you’ll actually read what I wrote, I said that -I- assumed something about YOUR position; namely that you disagreed with the Democrats method for dealing with the debt problems. An assumption on my part, yes, but one I admitted to up front in the interests of honesty. This is why we need to bring basic literacy back.

      On your last point, gay marriage isn’t ‘whatever in their own bedrooms’, and neither is it ‘indoctrination classes’ in school. And explain EXACTLY which part of these lessons in schools it is that you have a problem with? The part where they teach children that gay people are humans too? That bullying someone or discriminating against them on the basis of their sexuality is wrong? Go on, explain EXACTLY which facts are being taught in schools about gays and lesbians that qualifies as ‘indoctrination classes’. Be explicit, not vague.

      Thumb up 0
  15. lyn

    Rose, wrong again, the majority of my friends are liberal and I get their views all of the time. How many conservative friends do you have? Im not the one who spends my time on a one viewpoint blog that spends their time massaging each others egos. Get out in the real world , talk to people of all persuasions educate yourself just a little.

    Thumb up 0
    1. lilyv

      take your own advice lyn. this isn’t high school we’re not playing the “i have more friends” game. go out into the real world. i think everyone has had enough of your educated self. please stop with the trolling

      Thumb up 0
  16. lyn

    oh rose, your very reasoned arguments just knock me over. It wasnt me that stopped at high school apparently

    Thumb up 0
  17. lilyv

    i think what we proved here today is that you cannot fight ignorance with intelligence. you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink.

    Thumb up 0
  18. lyn

    I am not the one who spends their time blogging with those who think just like me and massaging each others egos. I came here by accident just reading the article. I always think its good to throw a little firecracker into these mutual admiration societies in the hopes that maybe a little objective factual information that hasnt been run by the PC will wake you guys up. You live in a bubble. Someday reality will break in a bite you on the ass (that will be fun). But until then you guys live in you fantasy world. bye

    Thumb up 0
    1. Paper0Flowers

      “It’s cool, I look good. You all look fake and crazy. Bye.”

      Thumb up 0
      1. allie

        like x10000000000

        Thumb up 0
    2. Jay

      You’re taking this all too seriously/hyperbolically right now for anything you say about ~reality~ to seem worth listening to.

      Thumb up 0
    3. JaneMansfield

      oh dude who is this self-hating lesbian?

      Thumb up 0
  19. Dina

    If Fox News goes down, I’m afraid something even more horrific will pop up in its place.

    Thumb up 0

Leave a Reply

Site Meter